Is there anyone here...
 

"HK" wrote in message
...
Eisboch wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...
wrote:


Not much in usenet is funnier than an uneducated ignorant ass like you
commenting on the education of some and knowledge of someone far smarter
than you will ever be. I don't know whether she would be a good, bad, or
indifferent U.S. senator, but I do know this: your only qualification
seems to be as the Shove Him Down the Stairs Dummy.


Isn't it ironic that the average IQ elects the "smart" leaders?

Eisboch


If you are referring to Obama as a smart leader, an analysis of voters who
actually voted showed Obama carried every group except white evangelicals.
Every group includes the smartest Americans. That analysis appeared on
many major media outlets.

Just Hate doesn't present to me as "average,' but, rather, below average.


You missed my point, but the hell with it.

Eisboch

Is there anyone here...
 

Eisboch wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...
Eisboch wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...
wrote:


Not much in usenet is funnier than an uneducated ignorant ass like
you commenting on the education of some and knowledge of someone far
smarter than you will ever be. I don't know whether she would be a
good, bad, or indifferent U.S. senator, but I do know this: your
only qualification seems to be as the Shove Him Down the Stairs Dummy.


Isn't it ironic that the average IQ elects the "smart" leaders?

Eisboch


If you are referring to Obama as a smart leader, an analysis of voters
who actually voted showed Obama carried every group except white
evangelicals. Every group includes the smartest Americans. That
analysis appeared on many major media outlets.

Just Hate doesn't present to me as "average,' but, rather, below average.


You missed my point, but the hell with it.

Eisboch



Oh, well.

Is there anyone here...
 

On Jan 4, 1:59*pm, (Richard Casady) wrote:
On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 12:47:02 -0500, HK wrote:
Obama carried every group except white
evangelicals. Every group includes the smartest Americans

As I said, the Alaskan bimbo cost the votes of the top half of the IQ
scale.

Casady

So another one who believes anyone that does not subscribe to his
ideology has a low IQ.. That is the type of anti-democratic elitism
half the country is afraid of...

Is there anyone here...
 

On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 17:32:36 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Sun, 4 Jan 2009 13:08:30 -0700, "Canuck57"
wrote:

Me, I don't believe in aristocracy, just because she is a "Kennedy".

Same here, but as a non-voting Canuckastani terrorist, what difference
does your opinion make ?

All Canadians are our brothers.

Well, except for those who live in Quebec.

Or Nova Scotia.

I mean seriously - Nova Scotia? What the heck kind of name for a
province is Nova Scotia?

Then again, it is Canada.

Which is full of Canadians. :)

Although I have to admit - they do make a great boat.

Right Don? :)
--

Happy Holidays and Merry Whatever It Is
That ****es Liberals Off.

Is there anyone here...
 

Is there anyone here...
 

On Jan 4, 6:41*pm, hk wrote:
wrote:
On Jan 4, 1:59 pm, (Richard Casady) wrote:
On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 12:47:02 -0500, HK wrote:
Obama carried every group except white
evangelicals. Every group includes the smartest Americans
As I said, the Alaskan bimbo cost the votes of the top half of the IQ
scale.

Casady

So another one who believes anyone that does not subscribe to his
ideology has a low IQ.. That is the type of anti-democratic elitism
half the country is afraid of...

My opinion of Palin's IQ has nothing to do with her ideology. There are
plenty of smart conservatives on the national scene.

Ok, as long as you understand that.. I have had my fill over the years
with ones who only get their information from NPR, New York Lies, and
Jon Stewart telling me conservatives are simply "uninformed"... or
refering to half of America as "fly over states". Carry on...;)

She isn't one of them.

The world is not as simple as you would like it to be, Scotty.

Is there anyone here...
 

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 4 Jan 2009 09:16:17 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

On Jan 4, 11:58 am, wrote:
On Jan 4, 10:51 am, John H wrote:

...who can watch all of this video?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YV7uQsUMT9c

I can take about 52 seconds.

Thats all your limited brain can interpret.

We can interpret it just fine.. She is a slack jaw with a silver
spoon. She feels she owes nobody any explanation because of her name.
I can't imagine turning on c-span and seeing this incoherent moron
representing my country.

Harry's calling you names. If you care to send him a card and ask him to
stop, or give him a call, you can do so:

Harry Krause
2015 Rosedale Lane
Huntingtown, Maryland 20639
410 535-1594 (voice)
202 365-0164 (cell)


If anyone would care to write or call and advise John that he's invading
another posters privacy...

John Herring
6024 Mayfair Lane
Alexandria, Virginia 22310
(703) 971-8743

Is there anyone here...
 

"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
message ...
On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 17:32:36 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Sun, 4 Jan 2009 13:08:30 -0700, "Canuck57"
wrote:

Me, I don't believe in aristocracy, just because she is a "Kennedy".

Same here, but as a non-voting Canuckastani terrorist, what difference
does your opinion make ?

All Canadians are our brothers.

Well, except for those who live in Quebec.

Or Nova Scotia.

I mean seriously - Nova Scotia? What the heck kind of name for a
province is Nova Scotia?

Then again, it is Canada.

Which is full of Canadians. :)

Although I have to admit - they do make a great boat.

Right Don? :)
--


They sure do and it's nice to see them appreciated by a man of your refined
taste and exceptional judgement. ;-)

Is there anyone here...
 

On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 15:31:35 -0800, justwaitafrekinminute wrote:



So another one who believes anyone that does not subscribe to his
ideology has a low IQ.. That is the type of anti-democratic elitism half
the country is afraid of...

While I understand, and I'm sympathetic to your point, I just wanted to
point out that "anti-democratic elitism" was built into the Constitution
by our founding fathers. It's why we are a republic, not a true
democracy. It's a tough question really. While I think I would prefer a
more democratic approach. There are dangers, populist rabble-rousers,
fascist movements, etc. The founding fathers may have been right. After
all, we haven't been doing our democratic duty of holding our leader's
feet to the fire.

Is there anyone here...
 

On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 18:37:38 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:


I mean seriously - Nova Scotia? What the heck kind of name for a
province is Nova Scotia?

At least somebody up there knows Latin. ;-)