On Jan 3, 7:26*pm, GC Boater wrote:
Hey Harry, old Chap, how ‘bout the wager? *Now in my revised wager,
you only have to prove TWO of the three facts that you’ve stated
here. *Just to refresh your recall of the details, the original wager
is reproduced below. *How ‘bout it, Podner. *Or can we safely assume
(as some here have claimed) that you are a yellow-bellied, lying,
craven, whining, discredited, contemptible, foolish, hypocritical
crackpot?

The original offer (revised above):

You have stated on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical
doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman-
like lobster boat.
So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. *We both deposit equal amounts
of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated
escrow agent. *Upon your proof of the three items above to the
“reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to
a $100,000 profit. *If you fail to prove the above items, then I win
the wager.

that your are the yellow-bellied, lying, craven, whining, silly,
foolish crackpot that just a few folks here think you are?

The original offer (revised above):
You have stated on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical
doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman-
like lobster boat.
So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. *We both deposit equal amounts
of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated
escrow agent. *Upon your proof of the three items above to the
“reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to
a $100,000 profit. *If you fail to prove the above items, then I win
the wager.

You dont HAVE 100,000 Herring. And your Homosexual Stalker persona is
showing again.
Thats why they dont let your wife wear short skirts...when she sits,
her balls show.

On Jan 3, 9:07*pm, wrote:
On Jan 3, 7:26*pm, GC Boater wrote:





Hey Harry, old Chap, how ‘bout the wager? *Now in my revised wager,
you only have to prove TWO of the three facts that you’ve stated
here. *Just to refresh your recall of the details, the original wager
is reproduced below. *How ‘bout it, Podner. *Or can we safely assume
(as some here have claimed) that you are a yellow-bellied, lying,
craven, whining, discredited, contemptible, foolish, hypocritical
crackpot?

The original offer (revised above):

You have stated on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical
doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman-
like lobster boat.
So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. *We both deposit equal amounts
of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated
escrow agent. *Upon your proof of the three items above to the
“reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to
a $100,000 profit. *If you fail to prove the above items, then I win
the wager.

that your are the yellow-bellied, lying, craven, whining, silly,
foolish crackpot that just a few folks here think you are?

The original offer (revised above):
You have stated on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical
doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman-
like lobster boat.
So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. *We both deposit equal amounts
of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated
escrow agent. *Upon your proof of the three items above to the
“reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to
a $100,000 profit. *If you fail to prove the above items, then I win
the wager.

You dont HAVE 100,000 Herring. And your Homosexual Stalker persona is
showing again.
Thats why they dont let your wife wear short skirts...when she sits,
her balls show.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Hey SlamBam, this is not Herring. Are you drinking tonight? In any
event, I hear your doubt about me having the $100K. How about this.
Let Harry name the dollar amount, and then prove JUST ONE of the three
referenced claims. Once this is done, we'll both place the dollar
amount Harry has designated with a bonded escrow agent of his
choosing. Once he proves just ONE OTHER (only two total of the three
claims he has made here) then he wins the bet. If not, I win. Fair
enough?

On Jan 3, 10:32 pm, GC Boater wrote:
On Jan 3, 9:07 pm, wrote:



On Jan 3, 7:26 pm, GC Boater wrote:

Hey Harry, old Chap, how ‘bout the wager? Now in my revised wager,
you only have to prove TWO of the three facts that you’ve stated
here. Just to refresh your recall of the details, the original wager
is reproduced below. How ‘bout it, Podner. Or can we safely assume
(as some here have claimed) that you are a yellow-bellied, lying,
craven, whining, discredited, contemptible, foolish, hypocritical
crackpot?

The original offer (revised above):

You have stated on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical
doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman-
like lobster boat.
So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. We both deposit equal amounts
of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated
escrow agent. Upon your proof of the three items above to the
“reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to
a $100,000 profit. If you fail to prove the above items, then I win
the wager.

that your are the yellow-bellied, lying, craven, whining, silly,
foolish crackpot that just a few folks here think you are?

The original offer (revised above):
You have stated on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical
doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman-
like lobster boat.
So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. We both deposit equal amounts
of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated
escrow agent. Upon your proof of the three items above to the
“reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to
a $100,000 profit. If you fail to prove the above items, then I win
the wager.

You dont HAVE 100,000 Herring. And your Homosexual Stalker persona is
showing again.
Thats why they dont let your wife wear short skirts...when she sits,
her balls show.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Hey SlamBam, this is not Herring. Are you drinking tonight? In any
event, I hear your doubt about me having the $100K. How about this.
Let Harry name the dollar amount, and then prove JUST ONE of the three
referenced claims. Once this is done, we'll both place the dollar
amount Harry has designated with a bonded escrow agent of his
choosing. Once he proves just ONE OTHER (only two total of the three
claims he has made here) then he wins the bet. If not, I win. Fair
enough?

Harry has stated that he thinks Caroline Kennedy is smart. That
definitively places him (Harry) on the IQ spectrum somewhere less than
his age. In consideration of this, why worry about ANYTHING he says.
You are more likely to find intelligence in the random jabbering of
chimps. We all need to become adjusted to the concept that some
people are simply not qualified to have opinions. Sorry Harry, but
the truth sometimes hurts, better to find out now than later.

Frogwatch wrote:

Harry has stated that he thinks Caroline Kennedy is smart. That
definitively places him (Harry) on the IQ spectrum somewhere less than
his age. In consideration of this, why worry about ANYTHING he says.
You are more likely to find intelligence in the random jabbering of
chimps. We all need to become adjusted to the concept that some
people are simply not qualified to have opinions. Sorry Harry, but
the truth sometimes hurts, better to find out now than later.



You know, until this post of yours, I thought you were cut from slightly
better cloth than *some* of the slimeballs that frequent this newsgroup.

Do you know Caroline Kennedy? Are you aware of her academic and
foundation accomplishments? Do you have any empathy for that fact that
her father was assassinated in the service of this country when she was
a little girl, and that her uncle was also assassinated, and that her
initial shyness in this quest of hers might be related to a bit of
nervousness? Do you think she thinks she might be murdered, too?

She's smart enough, probably smarter than you are and I am. Why the
over-the-top personal attack on her and on me over this? You're behaving
like Herring, D K, Loogy, and the rest of the slimeballs...and I am
truly sorry to see that.

This newsgroup just keeps sliding farther into the cesspool.

On Jan 4, 9:35*am, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
Harry has stated that he thinks Caroline Kennedy is smart. *That
definitively places him (Harry) on the IQ spectrum somewhere less than
his age. *In consideration of this, why worry about ANYTHING he says.
You are more likely to find intelligence in the random jabbering of
chimps. *We all need to become adjusted to the concept that some
people are simply not qualified to have opinions. *Sorry Harry, but
the truth sometimes hurts, better to find out now than later.

You know, until this post of yours, I thought you were cut from slightly
better cloth than *some* of the slimeballs that frequent this *newsgroup.

Do you know Caroline Kennedy? Are you aware of her academic and
foundation accomplishments? Do you have any empathy for that fact that
her father was assassinated in the service of this country when she was
a little girl, and that her uncle was also assassinated, and that her
initial shyness in this quest of hers might be related to a bit of
nervousness? Do you think she thinks she might be murdered, too?

She's smart enough, probably smarter than you are and I am. Why the
over-the-top personal attack on her and on me over this? You're behaving
like Herring, D K, Loogy, and the rest of the slimeballs...and I am
truly sorry to see that.

This newsgroup just keeps sliding farther into the cesspool.

Then leave. Plain and simple.

HK wrote:

Do you know Caroline Kennedy?

She's smart enough, probably smarter than you are and I am. Why the
over-the-top personal attack on her and on me over this?

I don't know Caroline Kennedy, but I am positive she is smarter than
Harry Krause. I did think it was funny that Harry thinks it is a major
accomplishment to be smarter than he is.

On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 10:10:32 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

HK wrote:

Do you know Caroline Kennedy?

She's smart enough, probably smarter than you are and I am. Why the
over-the-top personal attack on her and on me over this?

I don't know Caroline Kennedy, but I am positive she is smarter than
Harry Krause. I did think it was funny that Harry thinks it is a major
accomplishment to be smarter than he is.


I don't think she's smarter than Harry Krause. I've heard Harry speak, in
person. It was bad, but it wasn't this bad:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YV7uQsUMT9c

"HK" wrote in message
...
Frogwatch wrote:

Harry has stated that he thinks Caroline Kennedy is smart. That
definitively places him (Harry) on the IQ spectrum somewhere less than
his age. In consideration of this, why worry about ANYTHING he says.
You are more likely to find intelligence in the random jabbering of
chimps. We all need to become adjusted to the concept that some
people are simply not qualified to have opinions. Sorry Harry, but
the truth sometimes hurts, better to find out now than later.



You know, until this post of yours, I thought you were cut from slightly
better cloth than *some* of the slimeballs that frequent this newsgroup.

Do you know Caroline Kennedy? Are you aware of her academic and foundation
accomplishments? Do you have any empathy for that fact that her father was
assassinated in the service of this country when she was a little girl,
and that her uncle was also assassinated, and that her initial shyness in
this quest of hers might be related to a bit of nervousness? Do you think
she thinks she might be murdered, too?

She's smart enough, probably smarter than you are and I am. Why the
over-the-top personal attack on her and on me over this? You're behaving
like Herring, D K, Loogy, and the rest of the slimeballs...and I am truly
sorry to see that.

This newsgroup just keeps sliding farther into the cesspool.


This slimeball behaviour is like an epidemic.
Maybe it's time the entire newsgroup was fumigated and started over.

Don White wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
Frogwatch wrote:

Harry has stated that he thinks Caroline Kennedy is smart. That
definitively places him (Harry) on the IQ spectrum somewhere less than
his age. In consideration of this, why worry about ANYTHING he says.
You are more likely to find intelligence in the random jabbering of
chimps. We all need to become adjusted to the concept that some
people are simply not qualified to have opinions. Sorry Harry, but
the truth sometimes hurts, better to find out now than later.


You know, until this post of yours, I thought you were cut from slightly
better cloth than *some* of the slimeballs that frequent this newsgroup.

Do you know Caroline Kennedy? Are you aware of her academic and foundation
accomplishments? Do you have any empathy for that fact that her father was
assassinated in the service of this country when she was a little girl,
and that her uncle was also assassinated, and that her initial shyness in
this quest of hers might be related to a bit of nervousness? Do you think
she thinks she might be murdered, too?

She's smart enough, probably smarter than you are and I am. Why the
over-the-top personal attack on her and on me over this? You're behaving
like Herring, D K, Loogy, and the rest of the slimeballs...and I am truly
sorry to see that.

This newsgroup just keeps sliding farther into the cesspool.


This slimeball behaviour is like an epidemic.
Maybe it's time the entire newsgroup was fumigated and started over.


Excellent idea. I recommend you leave.

Don Whitewash wrote"
"This slimeball behaviour is like an epidemic.
Maybe it's time the entire newsgroup was fumigated and started over."

Ahh, the man of the hour his own self checks in. The president of
S.T.U.P.I.D. (Society to Unite People in Dullness). And apparently
the genes are undiluted in the president’s next generation.