| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Will some heads at the NYT roll?
On Dec 23, 6:56*am, Salmonbait wrote:
And yes, some heads should roll at the NYT. But, they should have rolled a few years back. -- John Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year! yes, I feel they should, but do you think they will? |
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Will some heads at the NYT roll?
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 13:18:11 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:
On Dec 23, 6:56*am, Salmonbait wrote: And yes, some heads should roll at the NYT. But, they should have rolled a few years back. -- John Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year! yes, I feel they should, but do you think they will? No. The NYT is a liberal rag. Liberals, from my experience, could care less about the truth. Remember, morals are a religious, not a legal, concept. Therefore integrity is not a trait valued by liberals or secular progressives. Actually, you could figure that out right here in the NG. ;) -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Will some heads at the NYT roll?
Salmonbait wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 13:18:11 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: On Dec 23, 6:56 am, Salmonbait wrote: And yes, some heads should roll at the NYT. But, they should have rolled a few years back. -- John Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year! yes, I feel they should, but do you think they will? No. The NYT is a liberal rag. Liberals, from my experience, could care less about the truth. Remember, morals are a religious, not a legal, concept. Therefore integrity is not a trait valued by liberals or secular progressives. Actually, you could figure that out right here in the NG. ;) -- John snerk |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Will some heads at the NYT roll?
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:36:44 -0500, Salmonbait wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 13:18:11 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: On Dec 23, 6:56*am, Salmonbait wrote: And yes, some heads should roll at the NYT. But, they should have rolled a few years back. -- John Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year! yes, I feel they should, but do you think they will? No. The NYT is a liberal rag. Liberals, from my experience, could care less about the truth. Remember, morals are a religious, not a legal, concept. Therefore integrity is not a trait valued by liberals or secular progressives. Actually, you could figure that out right here in the NG. ;) Some of the most amoral creeps in time have been Popes. It damn sure isn't a religous concept. If you're interested do some homework. |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Will some heads at the NYT roll?
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:04:34 -0500, RLM wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:36:44 -0500, Salmonbait wrote: On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 13:18:11 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: On Dec 23, 6:56*am, Salmonbait wrote: And yes, some heads should roll at the NYT. But, they should have rolled a few years back. -- John Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year! yes, I feel they should, but do you think they will? No. The NYT is a liberal rag. Liberals, from my experience, could care less about the truth. Remember, morals are a religious, not a legal, concept. Therefore integrity is not a trait valued by liberals or secular progressives. Actually, you could figure that out right here in the NG. ;) Some of the most amoral creeps in time have been Popes. It damn sure isn't a religous concept. If you're interested do some homework. A religious concept isn't necessarily followed by 'religious' people. Look at Krause. He claims to be 'religious', but surely his faith doesn't promote lying and name-calling. -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John |
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Will some heads at the NYT roll?
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:14:30 -0500, Salmonbait wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:04:34 -0500, RLM wrote: On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:36:44 -0500, Salmonbait wrote: On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 13:18:11 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: On Dec 23, 6:56*am, Salmonbait wrote: And yes, some heads should roll at the NYT. But, they should have rolled a few years back. -- John Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year! yes, I feel they should, but do you think they will? No. The NYT is a liberal rag. Liberals, from my experience, could care less about the truth. Remember, morals are a religious, not a legal, concept. Therefore integrity is not a trait valued by liberals or secular progressives. Actually, you could figure that out right here in the NG. ;) Some of the most amoral creeps in time have been Popes. It damn sure isn't a religous concept. If you're interested do some homework. A religious concept isn't necessarily followed by 'religious' people. Look at Krause. He claims to be 'religious', but surely his faith doesn't promote lying and name-calling. Why would I care what Harry believes? Amswer, I don't. |
|
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Will some heads at the NYT roll?
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:21:03 -0500, RLM wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:14:30 -0500, Salmonbait wrote: On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:04:34 -0500, RLM wrote: On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:36:44 -0500, Salmonbait wrote: On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 13:18:11 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: On Dec 23, 6:56*am, Salmonbait wrote: And yes, some heads should roll at the NYT. But, they should have rolled a few years back. -- John Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year! yes, I feel they should, but do you think they will? No. The NYT is a liberal rag. Liberals, from my experience, could care less about the truth. Remember, morals are a religious, not a legal, concept. Therefore integrity is not a trait valued by liberals or secular progressives. Actually, you could figure that out right here in the NG. ;) Some of the most amoral creeps in time have been Popes. It damn sure isn't a religous concept. If you're interested do some homework. A religious concept isn't necessarily followed by 'religious' people. Look at Krause. He claims to be 'religious', but surely his faith doesn't promote lying and name-calling. Why would I care what Harry believes? Amswer, I don't. Good. He does make a fitting example however. -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John |
|
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Will some heads at the NYT roll?
Salmonbait wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:04:34 -0500, RLM wrote: On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:36:44 -0500, Salmonbait wrote: On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 13:18:11 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: On Dec 23, 6:56 am, Salmonbait wrote: And yes, some heads should roll at the NYT. But, they should have rolled a few years back. -- John Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year! yes, I feel they should, but do you think they will? No. The NYT is a liberal rag. Liberals, from my experience, could care less about the truth. Remember, morals are a religious, not a legal, concept. Therefore integrity is not a trait valued by liberals or secular progressives. Actually, you could figure that out right here in the NG. ;) Some of the most amoral creeps in time have been Popes. It damn sure isn't a religous concept. If you're interested do some homework. A religious concept isn't necessarily followed by 'religious' people. Look at Krause. He claims to be 'religious', but surely his faith doesn't promote lying and name-calling. Maybe it does. |
|
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Will some heads at the NYT roll?
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:40:21 -0500, BAR wrote:
Salmonbait wrote: On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:04:34 -0500, RLM wrote: On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:36:44 -0500, Salmonbait wrote: On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 13:18:11 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: On Dec 23, 6:56 am, Salmonbait wrote: And yes, some heads should roll at the NYT. But, they should have rolled a few years back. -- John Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year! yes, I feel they should, but do you think they will? No. The NYT is a liberal rag. Liberals, from my experience, could care less about the truth. Remember, morals are a religious, not a legal, concept. Therefore integrity is not a trait valued by liberals or secular progressives. Actually, you could figure that out right here in the NG. ;) Some of the most amoral creeps in time have been Popes. It damn sure isn't a religous concept. If you're interested do some homework. A religious concept isn't necessarily followed by 'religious' people. Look at Krause. He claims to be 'religious', but surely his faith doesn't promote lying and name-calling. Maybe it does. No. Judaism doesn't condone such behavior. -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John |
|
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Will some heads at the NYT roll?
Salmonbait wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:40:21 -0500, BAR wrote: Salmonbait wrote: On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:04:34 -0500, RLM wrote: On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:36:44 -0500, Salmonbait wrote: On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 13:18:11 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: On Dec 23, 6:56 am, Salmonbait wrote: And yes, some heads should roll at the NYT. But, they should have rolled a few years back. -- John Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year! yes, I feel they should, but do you think they will? No. The NYT is a liberal rag. Liberals, from my experience, could care less about the truth. Remember, morals are a religious, not a legal, concept. Therefore integrity is not a trait valued by liberals or secular progressives. Actually, you could figure that out right here in the NG. ;) Some of the most amoral creeps in time have been Popes. It damn sure isn't a religous concept. If you're interested do some homework. A religious concept isn't necessarily followed by 'religious' people. Look at Krause. He claims to be 'religious', but surely his faith doesn't promote lying and name-calling. Maybe it does. No. Judaism doesn't condone such behavior. -- John That's funny. You don't look Jewish. |
| Reply |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Fiberglass Roll | Boat Building | |||
| Fiberglass Roll | Cruising | |||
| Maine Roll-On | General | |||
| Maine Roll-On | Touring | |||
| The Roll Over! | Boat Building | |||
Hybrid Mode
