On Dec 22, 1:19*pm, Boater wrote:
Salmonbait wrote:
On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 09:59:51 -0500, Boater wrote:

http://tinyurl.com/793lg8

That D700 seems to have a focus problem. Perhaps you should have it
checked.

Other than the focus, the composition and lighting are spectacular. It's
beautiful the way you organized the colors for the complimentary effects.
It almost appears that you used a color wheel to get just the right
spectrum overall.

Perhaps a little more attention to the depth of field would have helped..
Does the D700 have a depth of field preview button? Sometimes it's useful.
--
We say, "THANK YOU, REGGIE"

Salmonbait

It's a snapshot of a couple of housepets napping and sort of napping on
their couch, Herring. That's all it is. Handheld, 1/15th of a second,
f/2.8, lens at 60mm, natural room lights. Not being an alcoholic, I can
handhold a camera at fairly low shutter speeds and get results that are
pleasing enough to the eye.

Your opinion matters naught to me.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Actually, it's NOT very "pleasing to the eye". It's out of focus, and
the depth of field sucks.

wrote:
On Dec 22, 1:19 pm, Boater wrote:
Salmonbait wrote:
On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 09:59:51 -0500, Boater wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/793lg8
That D700 seems to have a focus problem. Perhaps you should have it
checked.
Other than the focus, the composition and lighting are spectacular. It's
beautiful the way you organized the colors for the complimentary effects.
It almost appears that you used a color wheel to get just the right
spectrum overall.
Perhaps a little more attention to the depth of field would have helped..
Does the D700 have a depth of field preview button? Sometimes it's useful.
--
We say, "THANK YOU, REGGIE"
Salmonbait
It's a snapshot of a couple of housepets napping and sort of napping on
their couch, Herring. That's all it is. Handheld, 1/15th of a second,
f/2.8, lens at 60mm, natural room lights. Not being an alcoholic, I can
handhold a camera at fairly low shutter speeds and get results that are
pleasing enough to the eye.

Your opinion matters naught to me.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Actually, it's NOT very "pleasing to the eye". It's out of focus, and
the depth of field sucks.
One of the throw rugs seems to be in pretty decent focus.

On Dec 22, 2:16*pm, wrote:
On Dec 22, 1:19*pm, Boater wrote:





Salmonbait wrote:
On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 09:59:51 -0500, Boater wrote:

http://tinyurl.com/793lg8

That D700 seems to have a focus problem. Perhaps you should have it
checked.

Other than the focus, the composition and lighting are spectacular. It's
beautiful the way you organized the colors for the complimentary effects.
It almost appears that you used a color wheel to get just the right
spectrum overall.

Perhaps a little more attention to the depth of field would have helped.
Does the D700 have a depth of field preview button? Sometimes it's useful.
--
We say, "THANK YOU, REGGIE"

Salmonbait

It's a snapshot of a couple of housepets napping and sort of napping on
their couch, Herring. That's all it is. Handheld, 1/15th of a second,
f/2.8, lens at 60mm, natural room lights. Not being an alcoholic, I can
handhold a camera at fairly low shutter speeds and get results that are
pleasing enough to the eye.

Your opinion matters naught to me.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Actually, it's NOT very "pleasing to the eye". It's out of focus, and
the depth of field sucks.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Kinda like your face, huh?

wrote:
On Dec 22, 2:16 pm, wrote:
On Dec 22, 1:19 pm, Boater wrote:





Salmonbait wrote:
On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 09:59:51 -0500, Boater wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/793lg8
That D700 seems to have a focus problem. Perhaps you should have it
checked.
Other than the focus, the composition and lighting are spectacular. It's
beautiful the way you organized the colors for the complimentary effects.
It almost appears that you used a color wheel to get just the right
spectrum overall.
Perhaps a little more attention to the depth of field would have helped.
Does the D700 have a depth of field preview button? Sometimes it's useful.
--
We say, "THANK YOU, REGGIE"
Salmonbait
It's a snapshot of a couple of housepets napping and sort of napping on
their couch, Herring. That's all it is. Handheld, 1/15th of a second,
f/2.8, lens at 60mm, natural room lights. Not being an alcoholic, I can
handhold a camera at fairly low shutter speeds and get results that are
pleasing enough to the eye.
Your opinion matters naught to me.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Actually, it's NOT very "pleasing to the eye". It's out of focus, and
the depth of field sucks.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Kinda like your face, huh?

Are you twelve, or just a pathetic moron?