| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Boater wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote: Boater wrote: Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 06:42:18 -0500, Boater wrote: Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:35:28 -0400, "Don White" wrote: When I was downtown visiting Atlantic Photo, the oldest 'real photo store' in this area, the guy told me that the local professionals use either Nikon or Canon cameras. That may be true in North America, but the rest of the world knows better. Where is that, Tom? By the shores of Dongting Lake in Hunan Province? Nikon and Canon are the two leading brands of professional-grade SLR cameras used by professionals all around the world. No other brands even come close in that market segment. Do you have a cite that shows "the rest of the world knows better"? What does that mean, anyway? Gonna take me up on my offer? See your best stuff? How about it? What the hell does an exhibition of my photos on your site have to do with your claim that professional photographers in "the rest of the world know better" than to use Nikon or Canon equipment, or whatever it was you were trying to say there? The camera does not make the photograph. Some really nice photographic art has been captured with a pinhole camera or a Kodak Brownie. The WORST photo of Tom's was far superior to all of the blown out, poorly composed snapshots you have posted. Who could ever forget the mood and emotion your captured in your Stumpy photo. I was supposed to waste more than 10 seconds taking a photo of a tree stump we used for target practice? You apparently have nothing productive to do with your hobby time. I do. You have posted many photos in the past. The only ones that anyone liked you stole from other people's web site, and presented as your work. Why don't you post one photo you are proud of? |
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
Boater wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote: Boater wrote: Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 06:42:18 -0500, Boater wrote: Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:35:28 -0400, "Don White" wrote: When I was downtown visiting Atlantic Photo, the oldest 'real photo store' in this area, the guy told me that the local professionals use either Nikon or Canon cameras. That may be true in North America, but the rest of the world knows better. Where is that, Tom? By the shores of Dongting Lake in Hunan Province? Nikon and Canon are the two leading brands of professional-grade SLR cameras used by professionals all around the world. No other brands even come close in that market segment. Do you have a cite that shows "the rest of the world knows better"? What does that mean, anyway? Gonna take me up on my offer? See your best stuff? How about it? What the hell does an exhibition of my photos on your site have to do with your claim that professional photographers in "the rest of the world know better" than to use Nikon or Canon equipment, or whatever it was you were trying to say there? The camera does not make the photograph. Some really nice photographic art has been captured with a pinhole camera or a Kodak Brownie. The WORST photo of Tom's was far superior to all of the blown out, poorly composed snapshots you have posted. Who could ever forget the mood and emotion your captured in your Stumpy photo. I was supposed to waste more than 10 seconds taking a photo of a tree stump we used for target practice? You apparently have nothing productive to do with your hobby time. I do. You have posted many photos in the past. The only ones that anyone liked you stole from other people's web site, and presented as your work. Why don't you post one photo you are proud of? I guess I have to repeat this daily: I don't give a crap what you think. I don't give a crap about your advice. I don't give a crap about your "suggestions." Go diddle Loogy. He's local. |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Boater wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote: Boater wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote: Boater wrote: Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 06:42:18 -0500, Boater wrote: Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:35:28 -0400, "Don White" wrote: When I was downtown visiting Atlantic Photo, the oldest 'real photo store' in this area, the guy told me that the local professionals use either Nikon or Canon cameras. That may be true in North America, but the rest of the world knows better. Where is that, Tom? By the shores of Dongting Lake in Hunan Province? Nikon and Canon are the two leading brands of professional-grade SLR cameras used by professionals all around the world. No other brands even come close in that market segment. Do you have a cite that shows "the rest of the world knows better"? What does that mean, anyway? Gonna take me up on my offer? See your best stuff? How about it? What the hell does an exhibition of my photos on your site have to do with your claim that professional photographers in "the rest of the world know better" than to use Nikon or Canon equipment, or whatever it was you were trying to say there? The camera does not make the photograph. Some really nice photographic art has been captured with a pinhole camera or a Kodak Brownie. The WORST photo of Tom's was far superior to all of the blown out, poorly composed snapshots you have posted. Who could ever forget the mood and emotion your captured in your Stumpy photo. I was supposed to waste more than 10 seconds taking a photo of a tree stump we used for target practice? You apparently have nothing productive to do with your hobby time. I do. You have posted many photos in the past. The only ones that anyone liked you stole from other people's web site, and presented as your work. Why don't you post one photo you are proud of? I guess I have to repeat this daily: I don't give a crap what you think. I don't give a crap about your advice. I don't give a crap about your "suggestions." Go diddle Loogy. He's local. If you don't give a crap, I suggest you don't respond. Your obsession about my posts are getting old. |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
Boater wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote: Boater wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote: Boater wrote: Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 06:42:18 -0500, Boater wrote: Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:35:28 -0400, "Don White" wrote: When I was downtown visiting Atlantic Photo, the oldest 'real photo store' in this area, the guy told me that the local professionals use either Nikon or Canon cameras. That may be true in North America, but the rest of the world knows better. Where is that, Tom? By the shores of Dongting Lake in Hunan Province? Nikon and Canon are the two leading brands of professional-grade SLR cameras used by professionals all around the world. No other brands even come close in that market segment. Do you have a cite that shows "the rest of the world knows better"? What does that mean, anyway? Gonna take me up on my offer? See your best stuff? How about it? What the hell does an exhibition of my photos on your site have to do with your claim that professional photographers in "the rest of the world know better" than to use Nikon or Canon equipment, or whatever it was you were trying to say there? The camera does not make the photograph. Some really nice photographic art has been captured with a pinhole camera or a Kodak Brownie. The WORST photo of Tom's was far superior to all of the blown out, poorly composed snapshots you have posted. Who could ever forget the mood and emotion your captured in your Stumpy photo. I was supposed to waste more than 10 seconds taking a photo of a tree stump we used for target practice? You apparently have nothing productive to do with your hobby time. I do. You have posted many photos in the past. The only ones that anyone liked you stole from other people's web site, and presented as your work. Why don't you post one photo you are proud of? I guess I have to repeat this daily: I don't give a crap what you think. I don't give a crap about your advice. I don't give a crap about your "suggestions." Go diddle Loogy. He's local. If you don't give a crap, I suggest you don't respond. Your obsession about my posts are getting old. Go diddle Loogy. He's local and I am sure he will bend over for you. |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
Boater wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote: Boater wrote: Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 06:42:18 -0500, Boater wrote: Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:35:28 -0400, "Don White" wrote: When I was downtown visiting Atlantic Photo, the oldest 'real photo store' in this area, the guy told me that the local professionals use either Nikon or Canon cameras. That may be true in North America, but the rest of the world knows better. Where is that, Tom? By the shores of Dongting Lake in Hunan Province? Nikon and Canon are the two leading brands of professional-grade SLR cameras used by professionals all around the world. No other brands even come close in that market segment. Do you have a cite that shows "the rest of the world knows better"? What does that mean, anyway? Gonna take me up on my offer? See your best stuff? How about it? What the hell does an exhibition of my photos on your site have to do with your claim that professional photographers in "the rest of the world know better" than to use Nikon or Canon equipment, or whatever it was you were trying to say there? The camera does not make the photograph. Some really nice photographic art has been captured with a pinhole camera or a Kodak Brownie. The WORST photo of Tom's was far superior to all of the blown out, poorly composed snapshots you have posted. Who could ever forget the mood and emotion your captured in your Stumpy photo. I was supposed to waste more than 10 seconds taking a photo of a tree stump we used for target practice? You apparently have nothing productive to do with your hobby time. I do. You have posted many photos in the past. The only ones that anyone liked you stole from other people's web site, and presented as your work. Why don't you post one photo you are proud of? Well, there was the one of his fat little thumb and a postcard... ![]() ----------------- www.Newsgroup-Binaries.com - *Completion*Retention*Speed* Access your favorite newsgroups from home or on the road ----------------- |
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
SmallBoats.com wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote: Boater wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote: Boater wrote: Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 06:42:18 -0500, Boater wrote: Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:35:28 -0400, "Don White" wrote: When I was downtown visiting Atlantic Photo, the oldest 'real photo store' in this area, the guy told me that the local professionals use either Nikon or Canon cameras. That may be true in North America, but the rest of the world knows better. Where is that, Tom? By the shores of Dongting Lake in Hunan Province? Nikon and Canon are the two leading brands of professional-grade SLR cameras used by professionals all around the world. No other brands even come close in that market segment. Do you have a cite that shows "the rest of the world knows better"? What does that mean, anyway? Gonna take me up on my offer? See your best stuff? How about it? What the hell does an exhibition of my photos on your site have to do with your claim that professional photographers in "the rest of the world know better" than to use Nikon or Canon equipment, or whatever it was you were trying to say there? The camera does not make the photograph. Some really nice photographic art has been captured with a pinhole camera or a Kodak Brownie. The WORST photo of Tom's was far superior to all of the blown out, poorly composed snapshots you have posted. Who could ever forget the mood and emotion your captured in your Stumpy photo. I was supposed to waste more than 10 seconds taking a photo of a tree stump we used for target practice? You apparently have nothing productive to do with your hobby time. I do. You have posted many photos in the past. The only ones that anyone liked you stole from other people's web site, and presented as your work. Why don't you post one photo you are proud of? Well, there was the one of his fat little thumb and a postcard... ![]() ----------------- www.Newsgroup-Binaries.com - *Completion*Retention*Speed* Access your favorite newsgroups from home or on the road ----------------- His prize shot was taken in California. He's holding a room key or something with his name on it. You can see his gnawed off fingernails, fat little fingers, and Pillsbury dough boy like forearm. I wish I'd saved it. It was hilarious. |
|
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Dec 17, 12:20*pm, Jim wrote:
SmallBoats.com wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote: Boater wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote: Boater wrote: Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 06:42:18 -0500, Boater wrote: Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:35:28 -0400, "Don White" wrote: When I was downtown visiting Atlantic Photo, the oldest 'real photo store' in this area, the guy told me that the local professionals use either Nikon or Canon cameras. That may be true in North America, but the rest of the world knows better. Where is that, Tom? By the shores of Dongting Lake in Hunan Province? Nikon and Canon are the two leading brands of professional-grade SLR cameras used by professionals all around the world. No other brands even come close in that market segment. Do you have a cite that shows "the rest of the world knows better"? What does that mean, anyway? Gonna take me up on my offer? *See your best stuff? How about it? What the hell does an exhibition of my photos on your site have to do with your claim that professional photographers in "the rest of the world know better" than to use Nikon or Canon equipment, or whatever it was you were trying to say there? The camera does not make the photograph. *Some really nice photographic art has been captured with a pinhole camera or a Kodak Brownie. *The WORST photo of Tom's was far superior to all of the blown out, poorly composed snapshots you have posted. *Who could ever forget the mood and emotion your captured in your Stumpy photo. I was supposed to waste more than 10 seconds taking a photo of a tree stump we used for target practice? You apparently have nothing productive to do with your hobby time. I do. You have posted many photos in the past. *The only ones that anyone liked you stole from other people's web site, and presented as your work. *Why don't you post one photo you are proud of? Well, there was the one of his fat little thumb and a postcard... ![]() ----------------- www.Newsgroup-Binaries.com- *Completion*Retention*Speed* Access your favorite newsgroups from home or on the road ----------------- His prize shot was taken in California. He's holding a room key or something with his name on it. You can see his gnawed off fingernails, fat little fingers, and Pillsbury dough boy like forearm. I wish I'd saved it. It was hilarious.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Not to mention he is barely able to shoot over the railing on the balcony.. Unless the fence is 6 feet tall, he is not only fat, but short too. |
|
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jim wrote:
wrote: On Dec 17, 12:20 pm, Jim wrote: SmallBoats.com wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote: Boater wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote: Boater wrote: Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 06:42:18 -0500, Boater wrote: Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:35:28 -0400, "Don White" wrote: When I was downtown visiting Atlantic Photo, the oldest 'real photo store' in this area, the guy told me that the local professionals use either Nikon or Canon cameras. That may be true in North America, but the rest of the world knows better. Where is that, Tom? By the shores of Dongting Lake in Hunan Province? Nikon and Canon are the two leading brands of professional-grade SLR cameras used by professionals all around the world. No other brands even come close in that market segment. Do you have a cite that shows "the rest of the world knows better"? What does that mean, anyway? Gonna take me up on my offer? See your best stuff? How about it? What the hell does an exhibition of my photos on your site have to do with your claim that professional photographers in "the rest of the world know better" than to use Nikon or Canon equipment, or whatever it was you were trying to say there? The camera does not make the photograph. Some really nice photographic art has been captured with a pinhole camera or a Kodak Brownie. The WORST photo of Tom's was far superior to all of the blown out, poorly composed snapshots you have posted. Who could ever forget the mood and emotion your captured in your Stumpy photo. I was supposed to waste more than 10 seconds taking a photo of a tree stump we used for target practice? You apparently have nothing productive to do with your hobby time. I do. You have posted many photos in the past. The only ones that anyone liked you stole from other people's web site, and presented as your work. Why don't you post one photo you are proud of? Well, there was the one of his fat little thumb and a postcard... ![]() ----------------- www.Newsgroup-Binaries.com- *Completion*Retention*Speed* Access your favorite newsgroups from home or on the road ----------------- His prize shot was taken in California. He's holding a room key or something with his name on it. You can see his gnawed off fingernails, fat little fingers, and Pillsbury dough boy like forearm. I wish I'd saved it. It was hilarious.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Not to mention he is barely able to shoot over the railing on the balcony.. Unless the fence is 6 feet tall, he is not only fat, but short too. You have better recollection than I do. You didn't save the shot, by any chance, did you? pfffftttt.. no... ----------------- www.Newsgroup-Binaries.com - *Completion*Retention*Speed* Access your favorite newsgroups from home or on the road ----------------- |
|
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote:
On Dec 17, 12:20 pm, Jim wrote: SmallBoats.com wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote: Boater wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote: Boater wrote: Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 06:42:18 -0500, Boater wrote: Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:35:28 -0400, "Don White" wrote: When I was downtown visiting Atlantic Photo, the oldest 'real photo store' in this area, the guy told me that the local professionals use either Nikon or Canon cameras. That may be true in North America, but the rest of the world knows better. Where is that, Tom? By the shores of Dongting Lake in Hunan Province? Nikon and Canon are the two leading brands of professional-grade SLR cameras used by professionals all around the world. No other brands even come close in that market segment. Do you have a cite that shows "the rest of the world knows better"? What does that mean, anyway? Gonna take me up on my offer? See your best stuff? How about it? What the hell does an exhibition of my photos on your site have to do with your claim that professional photographers in "the rest of the world know better" than to use Nikon or Canon equipment, or whatever it was you were trying to say there? The camera does not make the photograph. Some really nice photographic art has been captured with a pinhole camera or a Kodak Brownie. The WORST photo of Tom's was far superior to all of the blown out, poorly composed snapshots you have posted. Who could ever forget the mood and emotion your captured in your Stumpy photo. I was supposed to waste more than 10 seconds taking a photo of a tree stump we used for target practice? You apparently have nothing productive to do with your hobby time. I do. You have posted many photos in the past. The only ones that anyone liked you stole from other people's web site, and presented as your work. Why don't you post one photo you are proud of? Well, there was the one of his fat little thumb and a postcard... ![]() ----------------- www.Newsgroup-Binaries.com- *Completion*Retention*Speed* Access your favorite newsgroups from home or on the road ----------------- His prize shot was taken in California. He's holding a room key or something with his name on it. You can see his gnawed off fingernails, fat little fingers, and Pillsbury dough boy like forearm. I wish I'd saved it. It was hilarious.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Not to mention he is barely able to shoot over the railing on the balcony.. Unless the fence is 6 feet tall, he is not only fat, but short too. Tell you what...you come on down here with a pile of money in your pocket. I will give you $5000 cash for every inch I am shorter than 5'11" and you will give me $5000 for every inch I am taller than 5'11". Bring $10000 to $15000. Put up or shut up, short****. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| More on Four-Thirds Photo Gear | General | |||
| Garmin Micro G-Charts - Is there Another way? | Electronics | |||
| armin Micro G-Charts - Is there another way? | General | |||
| micro g charts | Electronics | |||
| FS: Pyranha Micro 240 in WNC | Whitewater | |||