Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just to be different, I'm leaning towards the Canon lineup of cameras.
After reading my 'bible', the Consumer Report December issue, I had pretty well settled on the PowerShot A650IS but after handling the camera in a store..(felt cheap) and finding out that it is a 2007 model (not in the current lineup), I'm thinking again. I'm leaning towards the G10 top of the line compact rather than the Rebel SXI DSLR. (lower level SLR) Although the price difference between them isn't that much ($250.00 CDN) unless you add a telephoto lens, the convience of the smaller, lighter G10 might make up for the weakness of the much smaller processer to handle dim light conditions and noise at 400 ISO or higher. The G10 is slower also, so not the greatest for fast action sports. Does anyone here own a G10....... or at least seriously tried it out? |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don White wrote:
Just to be different, I'm leaning towards the Canon lineup of cameras. After reading my 'bible', the Consumer Report December issue, I had pretty well settled on the PowerShot A650IS but after handling the camera in a store..(felt cheap) and finding out that it is a 2007 model (not in the current lineup), I'm thinking again. I'm leaning towards the G10 top of the line compact rather than the Rebel SXI DSLR. (lower level SLR) Although the price difference between them isn't that much ($250.00 CDN) unless you add a telephoto lens, the convience of the smaller, lighter G10 might make up for the weakness of the much smaller processer to handle dim light conditions and noise at 400 ISO or higher. The G10 is slower also, so not the greatest for fast action sports. Does anyone here own a G10....... or at least seriously tried it out? My wife has a Canon A710 I got for her as a gift. It has a wide to tele lens, and takes lovely photos. I believe it has been replaced by an A720. The G10 is many steps up from that one. It's got a high megapix sensor, and there's even a waterproof case accessory. How much "fast acton sports" photography do you do, anyway? |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Boater" wrote in message ... Don White wrote: Just to be different, I'm leaning towards the Canon lineup of cameras. After reading my 'bible', the Consumer Report December issue, I had pretty well settled on the PowerShot A650IS but after handling the camera in a store..(felt cheap) and finding out that it is a 2007 model (not in the current lineup), I'm thinking again. I'm leaning towards the G10 top of the line compact rather than the Rebel SXI DSLR. (lower level SLR) Although the price difference between them isn't that much ($250.00 CDN) unless you add a telephoto lens, the convience of the smaller, lighter G10 might make up for the weakness of the much smaller processer to handle dim light conditions and noise at 400 ISO or higher. The G10 is slower also, so not the greatest for fast action sports. Does anyone here own a G10....... or at least seriously tried it out? My wife has a Canon A710 I got for her as a gift. It has a wide to tele lens, and takes lovely photos. I believe it has been replaced by an A720. The G10 is many steps up from that one. It's got a high megapix sensor, and there's even a waterproof case accessory. How much "fast acton sports" photography do you do, anyway? You otta seem me race around in my Princecraft Yukon. ;-) |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:50:22 -0400, "Don White"
wrote: "Boater" wrote in message ... Don White wrote: Just to be different, I'm leaning towards the Canon lineup of cameras. After reading my 'bible', the Consumer Report December issue, I had pretty well settled on the PowerShot A650IS but after handling the camera in a store..(felt cheap) and finding out that it is a 2007 model (not in the current lineup), I'm thinking again. I'm leaning towards the G10 top of the line compact rather than the Rebel SXI DSLR. (lower level SLR) Although the price difference between them isn't that much ($250.00 CDN) unless you add a telephoto lens, the convience of the smaller, lighter G10 might make up for the weakness of the much smaller processer to handle dim light conditions and noise at 400 ISO or higher. The G10 is slower also, so not the greatest for fast action sports. Does anyone here own a G10....... or at least seriously tried it out? My wife has a Canon A710 I got for her as a gift. It has a wide to tele lens, and takes lovely photos. I believe it has been replaced by an A720. The G10 is many steps up from that one. It's got a high megapix sensor, and there's even a waterproof case accessory. How much "fast acton sports" photography do you do, anyway? You otta seem me race around in my Princecraft Yukon. ;-) You own a Yukon? I used to own one of those - great boats. :) |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 15, 11:50*am, "Don White" wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message ... Don White wrote: Just to be different, I'm leaning towards the Canon lineup of cameras. After reading my 'bible', the Consumer Report December issue, I had pretty well settled on the PowerShot A650IS but after handling the camera in a store..(felt cheap) and finding out that it is a 2007 model (not in the current lineup), I'm thinking again. I'm leaning towards the G10 top of the line compact rather than the Rebel SXI DSLR. *(lower level SLR) Although the price difference between them isn't that much ($250.00 CDN) unless you add a telephoto lens, the convience of the smaller, lighter G10 might make up for the weakness of the much smaller processer to handle dim light conditions and noise at 400 ISO or higher. The G10 is slower also, so not the greatest for fast action sports. Does anyone here own a G10....... or at least seriously tried it out? My wife has a Canon A710 I got for her as a gift. It has a wide to tele lens, and takes lovely photos. I believe it has been replaced by an A720. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Harry Krause wrote, interalia:
"It has a wide to telelens, and takes lovely photos." ____________________________________ "Lovely." What kind of queer word is that for a man to be using? |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 20:20:10 -0800 (PST), GC Boater
wrote: Harry Krause wrote, interalia: "It has a wide to telelens, and takes lovely photos." ____________________________________ "Lovely." What kind of queer word is that for a man to be using? The best photos to come from the household were taken by Mrs. Harry, thence the word 'lovely'. -- John |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John wrote:
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 20:20:10 -0800 (PST), GC Boater wrote: Harry Krause wrote, interalia: "It has a wide to telelens, and takes lovely photos." ____________________________________ "Lovely." What kind of queer word is that for a man to be using? The best photos to come from the household were taken by Mrs. Harry, thence the word 'lovely'. You're ever the asshole, eh, Herring? I noticed you posted about 50 times in a row last night...and figured not one of them was worth reading, so...I just skipped 'em. |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:39:02 -0400, "Don White"
wrote: Just to be different, I'm leaning towards the Canon lineup of cameras. After reading my 'bible', the Consumer Report December issue, I had pretty well settled on the PowerShot A650IS but after handling the camera in a store..(felt cheap) and finding out that it is a 2007 model (not in the current lineup), I'm thinking again. I'm leaning towards the G10 top of the line compact rather than the Rebel SXI DSLR. (lower level SLR) Although the price difference between them isn't that much ($250.00 CDN) unless you add a telephoto lens, the convience of the smaller, lighter G10 might make up for the weakness of the much smaller processer to handle dim light conditions and noise at 400 ISO or higher. The G10 is slower also, so not the greatest for fast action sports. Does anyone here own a G10....... or at least seriously tried it out? Well, if price isn't a problem, I would opt for the DSLR over the fixed lens G10. They are pretty much in the same category as far as weight and size go and the DSLR is much more versatile given certain factors - such as shutter speeds, adjustments and lens adaptability. With a decent zoom, you will get a much better image due to the fact that a lot of fixed lens zoom is digital in nature rather than being a function of lens length. However, its really up to you and what you are comfortable with. The new Olympus Stylus SW series is getting great reviews - most notably it's nearly indestructible nature. And it takes some unbelievable pictures. It's not a 4/3rds camera - yet. http://www.getolympus.ca/ |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 15, 11:57*am, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote: On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:39:02 -0400, "Don White" wrote: Just to be different, I'm leaning towards the Canon lineup of cameras. After reading my 'bible', the Consumer Report December issue, I had pretty well settled on the PowerShot A650IS but after handling the camera in a store..(felt cheap) and finding out that it is a 2007 model (not in the current lineup), I'm thinking again. I'm leaning towards the G10 top of the line compact rather than the Rebel SXI DSLR. *(lower level SLR) Although the price difference between them isn't that much ($250.00 CDN) unless you add a telephoto lens, the convience of the smaller, lighter G10 might make up for the weakness of the much smaller processer to handle dim light conditions and noise at 400 ISO or higher. The G10 is slower also, so not the greatest for fast action sports. Does anyone here own a G10....... or at least seriously tried it out? Well, if price isn't a problem, I would opt for the DSLR over the fixed lens G10. *They are pretty much in the same category as far as weight and size go and the DSLR is much more versatile given certain factors - such as shutter speeds, adjustments and lens adaptability. With a decent zoom, you will get a much better image due to the fact that a lot of fixed lens zoom is digital in nature rather than being a function of lens length. However, its really up to you and what you are comfortable with. The new Olympus Stylus SW series is getting great reviews - most notably it's nearly indestructible nature. *And it takes some unbelievable pictures. *It's not a 4/3rds camera - yet. http://www.getolympus.ca/ We hosted our annual neighborhood Christams party last Saturday night, and since my wife and I are looking to get a new camera, I asked one of our guests about it. The guy and his wife own and operate one of the best photography studios around. His recommendation for a point-n-shoot was Canon. Specifically, he said to get no more than an 8MP camera, and make it a Canon. That's what they own and use when appropriate. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Speed cameras | ASA | |||
Real cameras | ASA | |||
Bob knows cameras | ASA | |||
video cameras | General |