On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 16:53:20 -0600, wrote:

On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 17:50:08 -0500, JohnH wrote:


Besides, looking for the Maryland Red Barn is not 'stalking'. Driving by
my house and taking pictures is.

What did I miss? I don't remember any pictures of your house being
posted.

****ty picture too.
--
John

Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!

On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 17:57:08 -0500, Boater wrote:

wrote:
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 17:50:08 -0500, JohnH wrote:


Besides, looking for the Maryland Red Barn is not 'stalking'. Driving
by my house and taking pictures is.

What did I miss? I don't remember any pictures of your house being
posted.


*After* Herring posted the info on our house today, I posted a URL of a
photo that shows his house and car. But...it wasn't a photo I took, even
though schitt-for-brains Herring thinks it is.

Whether you took it or not, posting it ain't right. Only John has that
prerogative. You guys seem to love bashing each other. I find that gets
old and boring, but it is harmless. When you take it from the internet
to the real world, you are crossing lines that shouldn't be crossed.
Usenet is supposed to be fun, and harmless.

wrote:
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 17:57:08 -0500, Boater wrote:

wrote:
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 17:50:08 -0500, JohnH wrote:


Besides, looking for the Maryland Red Barn is not 'stalking'. Driving
by my house and taking pictures is.
What did I miss? I don't remember any pictures of your house being
posted.

*After* Herring posted the info on our house today, I posted a URL of a
photo that shows his house and car. But...it wasn't a photo I took, even
though schitt-for-brains Herring thinks it is.

Whether you took it or not, posting it ain't right. Only John has that
prerogative. You guys seem to love bashing each other. I find that gets
old and boring, but it is harmless. When you take it from the internet
to the real world, you are crossing lines that shouldn't be crossed.
Usenet is supposed to be fun, and harmless.


Herring *is* fun *and* harmless *if* you like doddering old fools.

I agree with your point, by the way. But Herring doesn't. I simply gave
him a taste of what he was dishing out.

wrote:
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 17:29:45 -0500, Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:


If Harry did not want the link to his house posted, he never should have
posted his address?

IIRC, he didn't, someone else posted that information from an email.
Regardless, usenet is meant to be harmless fun, not a stalker's
paradise. Some of you need to get out more, you're taking this far, far,
to seriously.

Harry is fun to tweak, because he takes himself so seriously, and he
tells so many lies that he can never keep up with them all. Tweaking
Harry is not stalking him. You sound like JimH when Harry posting a link
to JimH's house and told Jim he thought his house was a tacky cookie
cutter neighborhood. For years JimH talked about Harry stalking him and
making threats to him, his wife and his kids. I never saw Harry make a
threat to JimH. I didn't see anyone make any threats to Harry, I saw
people asking him about his 3/4 mile driveway and 5 acre lawn.

Do you find Harry's posts wishing people would die to be entertaining?

On Dec 9, 4:59*pm, JohnH wrote:
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 16:53:20 -0600, wrote:
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 17:50:08 -0500, JohnH wrote:

Besides, looking for the Maryland Red Barn is not 'stalking'. Driving by
my house and taking pictures is.

What did I miss? *I don't remember any pictures of your house being
posted.

****ty picture too.
--
John


The out house?

On Tue, 9 Dec 2008 15:27:32 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:

On Dec 9, 4:59*pm, JohnH wrote:
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 16:53:20 -0600, wrote:
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 17:50:08 -0500, JohnH wrote:

Besides, looking for the Maryland Red Barn is not 'stalking'. Driving by
my house and taking pictures is.

What did I miss? *I don't remember any pictures of your house being
posted.

****ty picture too.
--
John


The out house?

Well, yeah. You don't think I actually reside in that building that was
shown, do you?


--
John

Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 17:16:37 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 16:46:23 -0500, JohnH
wrote:

That's OK. You're allowed to feel that way about it.

In fact, it's righteous of you.

I'm just surprised at how long it took for these feelings to emerge!

I don't pay attention to every post from every poster. I do miss a
few - well, more than a few really if you want to know the truth. :)

I understand. Completely.
--
John


Good Lord John...quit being a crybaby.
What you did was wrong and you know it. Other posters personal information
should stay personal.
There just may be people crazier than your army ir-regulars in here.

On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 18:18:20 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

wrote:
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 17:29:45 -0500, Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:


If Harry did not want the link to his house posted, he never should have
posted his address?

IIRC, he didn't, someone else posted that information from an email.
Regardless, usenet is meant to be harmless fun, not a stalker's
paradise. Some of you need to get out more, you're taking this far, far,
to seriously.

Harry is fun to tweak, because he takes himself so seriously, and he
tells so many lies that he can never keep up with them all. Tweaking
Harry is not stalking him. You sound like JimH when Harry posting a link
to JimH's house and told Jim he thought his house was a tacky cookie
cutter neighborhood. For years JimH talked about Harry stalking him and
making threats to him, his wife and his kids. I never saw Harry make a
threat to JimH. I didn't see anyone make any threats to Harry, I saw
people asking him about his 3/4 mile driveway and 5 acre lawn.

Do you find Harry's posts wishing people would die to be entertaining?

And, he gets so downright angry every time he gets caught in another lie!
--
John

Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!

On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 18:18:20 -0500, Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:


Do you find Harry's posts wishing people would die to be entertaining?

Entertaining? No. Frankly, I rarely read them. When a thread devolves
into 2 or 3 of the usual suspects, back and forth, I'm on to the next
thread.

However, as I have already said, as long as it stays on usenet, I see no
harm, no foul, just boring. When someone, anyone, brings the real world
here, I think that is out of line.

wrote in message
t...


However, as I have already said, as long as it stays on usenet, I see no
harm, no foul, just boring. When someone, anyone, brings the real world
here, I think that is out of line.


This isn't the real world?

Crap. I must be in a coma. It's all a dream.

Eisboch :-)