Dudes...
 

Boater wrote:
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Mon, 8 Dec 2008 17:33:18 -0400, "Don White"
wrote:

"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
message ...
On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 13:52:35 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

I am not a religious person, but if you think about it, you have this
all backwards. Someone who is religious will KNOW if a supreme being
does exist, yet someone who isn't religious might not know even if a
supreme being does exist.
And that would be me and I do, indeed exist.

Also, keep tabs on your email for the next few days - something will
be enroute shortly.

Moron. :)
What about that 'package' you sent up to me?
Did you lash it to a donkey and point it towards the border?

Ain't mailed it yet.


Are you sending me a "holiday spirit" package, too?

Do you want them sent to Karen's house?

Dudes...
 

Boater wrote:
D.Duck wrote:

Why do you have such disdain for folks that hunt air breathing
creatures but find fishing acceptable?


Because I can. I don't think stalking animals in the woods, and then
shooting them from 200 yards away with a high-powered rifle and scope is
"sport." I'm also disgusted these days by those who fish for sharks and
other mostly inedible pelagics for the "sport" of it.

There's absolutely nothing "manly" about shooting deer or doves or most
other harmless creatures.

Sharks are edible, asshole.

Dudes...
 

Boater wrote:
D.Duck wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message
...
D.Duck wrote:
Why do you have such disdain for folks that hunt air breathing
creatures but find fishing acceptable?

Because I can. I don't think stalking animals in the woods, and then
shooting them from 200 yards away with a high-powered rifle and scope
is "sport." I'm also disgusted these days by those who fish for
sharks and other mostly inedible pelagics for the "sport" of it.

There's absolutely nothing "manly" about shooting deer or doves or
most other harmless creatures.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with *thinning* the herd. It's good
conservation. I don't condone the killing if the meat is wasted.

What isn't *harmless* about the creatures of lakes/sea that are fished
from the end of a line where the creature cannot see his enemy?

Seems a bit hypocritical to me.




My point about hunting and it has been the same for years is that it is
not sport, not in the way I would define sport. It's just semi-organized
slaughter of harmless animals.

The few times I have watched hunting shows on TV I've been astonished by
the "mystique" of the hosts, who think it is something miraculous to
stalk the woods, climb up into a tree, call in a male deer with scent or
sound, and then...shoot it. That's sport? Even worse are the brave white
hunters who stalk sheep. Sheep? Jesus.

Now, hunting with a longbow, that is something that requires lots of
skill and some balls, because you usually have to get close enough to an
animal to risk getting injured.

I've never claimed fishing was "manly," although fishing successfully
where you cannot see your potential catch does seem to require more
skill than looking through a scope and pulling a trigger. Fly fishing
requires a good deal of skill.

I don't fish very seriously these days. Sometimes I don't even bait my
hook.

That's just dumb. Join PETA and get lost, WAFA.

Dudes...
 

Dudes...
 

Don White wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message
...
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
Jim wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
Boater wrote:

I don't give a schitt
about you or your opinions or your cites. Frankly, our visiting
raccoons seem a higher life form than you.
According to the
Once again, I don't give a schitt about you, your opinions or your
cites.
I think something is wrong
Hey. if you want to continue behaving like an asshole, it's your business.
I suppose if I lived in a crappy townhouse in a crappy suburb of crappy
Hot-Lanta, I'd behave as you do.

Townhouse??
The way Waylon talks, I envisioned him as lord & master of a plantation
somewhat like 'Tara'.



Who the hell is Waylon? One of your cartoon friends again, dummy?

Dudes...
 

"D K" wrote in message
...

Who the hell is Waylon? One of your cartoon friends again, dummy?


Not too bright , are you?
http://www.thesimpsons.com/bios/bios...e_smithers.htm

Saw your picture there also...
http://www.thesimpsons.com/bios/bios...ideshowbob.htm

Dudes...
 

"D K" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
message ...
On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 13:52:35 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

I am not a religious person, but if you think about it, you have this
all backwards. Someone who is religious will KNOW if a supreme being
does exist, yet someone who isn't religious might not know even if a
supreme being does exist.
And that would be me and I do, indeed exist.

Also, keep tabs on your email for the next few days - something will
be enroute shortly.

Moron. :)

What about that 'package' you sent up to me?
Did you lash it to a donkey and point it towards the border?

Try email, dummy. It's more appropriate.

Try minding your own business asshole. That would be appropriate.

Dudes...
 

Don White wrote:
"D K" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
message ...
On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 13:52:35 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

I am not a religious person, but if you think about it, you have this
all backwards. Someone who is religious will KNOW if a supreme being
does exist, yet someone who isn't religious might not know even if a
supreme being does exist.
And that would be me and I do, indeed exist.

Also, keep tabs on your email for the next few days - something will
be enroute shortly.

Moron. :)
What about that 'package' you sent up to me?
Did you lash it to a donkey and point it towards the border?
Try email, dummy. It's more appropriate.

Try minding your own business asshole. That would be appropriate.




Shame on you, cavorting with Dickless Krueger... :)

Dudes...
 

On Dec 14, 10:42*pm, "Don White" wrote:


Try minding your own business asshole. That would be appropriate.

You just don't get this open internet group stuff, do you? You
shouldn't really be allowed on line. Do your family members know you
sit around all day making an idiot of yourself? Seems you only open
your mouth to change feet. Dim wit..

Dudes...
 

wrote in message
...
On Dec 14, 10:42 pm, "Don White" wrote:


Try minding your own business asshole. That would be appropriate.

You just don't get this open internet group stuff, do you? You
shouldn't really be allowed on line. Do your family members know you
sit around all day making an idiot of yourself? Seems you only open
your mouth to change feet. Dim wit..

**************************************************
Time for you to light up another Georgia Golden Bud.
Don't worry, your buddy will send another 'care package' when your current
supply runs low.

Dudes...
 

On Dec 14, 11:11*pm, "Don White" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Dec 14, 10:42 pm, "Don White" wrote:



Try minding your own business asshole. That would be appropriate.

You just don't get this open internet group stuff, do you? You
shouldn't really be allowed on line. Do your family members know you
sit around all day making an idiot of yourself? Seems you only open
your mouth to change feet. Dim wit..

**************************************************
Time for you to light up another Georgia Golden Bud.
Don't worry, your buddy will send another 'care package' when your current
supply runs low.

Thanks Don! Now you've accused me of illegal interstate commerce! Be
prepared.

Dudes...
 

On Dec 10, 3:46*pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:
Boater wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
Boater wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
Boater wrote:
John wrote:
On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 09:17:43 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 05:36:55 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

On Dec 9, 5:57 pm, Boater wrote:
wrote:
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 17:50:08 -0500, JohnH wrote:
Besides, looking for the Maryland Red Barn is not 'stalking'.
Driving by
my house and taking pictures is.
What did I miss? *I don't remember any pictures of your house
being
posted.
*After* Herring posted the info on our house today, I posted a
URL of a
photo that shows his house and car. But...it wasn't a photo I
took, even
though schitt-for-brains Herring thinks it is.
Harry, what about that 3/4 mile driveway you claim to have and 5
acre
lawn?
LIAR!

That's the problem. Harry lies so much, he has no chance to keep his
stories straight. But, I see you've noticed that also.

Don't you worry about losing Harry's friendship calling him names
like
that?

3/4 mile driveway? I never said I had a 3/4 mile driveway. Are
loogy and herringbrain sucking on the same soda straw?

Harry,
It is hard for you to keep up with your stories, but when they were
paving the street you lived on, you actually posted photos of the
street taking from the front of your driveway, pointing up towards
the traffic circle. *You took the photo from the street and it was
highlighting the work they were doing on the street in the area of
traffic circle down the block from your driveway. *It definitely
looked like it was 3/4 mile, but a photo can be deceptive.

What you really said was:

* My driveway is approximately 200' long, including the portion
that *attaches to our traffic circle, and is 30' wide in spots. I
suspect *your boat on a trailer and your entire family in a
Winnebago would fit *on it."

The traffic circle is no where close to your driveway and is part of
the public street into your small subdivision. *Your driveway is
definitely is not close to being 200' long and 30 ft. wide.

Uh, Reggie...the photo was taken from our driveway. In fact, if I
recall, I was standing inside my garage because the pavers were out
there with hot asphalt. Nice try, though. No sense responding to the
rest of your nonsense. The traffic circle is the end of the public
street, and abuts our property.

It is as usual fun watching you drool over things you don't know.

I did see the photo of your home and neighborhood. The traffic circle
is no where near your driveway. *Why do you fabricate this and all the
other stories? *Your wife has a good job, you don't need to make her
out to be a Dr. Dr., you live in a nice home, you don't have to
pretend you have 200' driveway with a traffic circle etc. *Enjoy your
life and yourself for what it is. *The stories are just silly, and
trust me, no one believes any of them. *+

D'oh. I didn't say the traffic circle was next to my driveway.

Sometime in 2009, my wife *will* be a doctor. When it happens, I'll be
sure to email you the appropriate notice.

Meantime, please let us know when you find a pair, since you obviously
don't have any.

If your wife really is working on his PhD in social work, she is to be
commended. *As I told you at the time, she has chosen a career where she
hopefully can have a positive impact on many people's lives. *Her career
as a social worker is just as valuable of a career as a medical doctor.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Gee, that's funny. Now she'll be a Dr. sometime in 2009........
Then it WAS nothing short of a lie when he said she was a Dr. Dr.
Another one of Harry's lies busted!

Dudes...
 

On Dec 10, 4:41*pm, Boater wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:





Boater wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
Boater wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
Boater wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
Boater wrote:
John wrote:
On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 09:17:43 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 05:36:55 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

On Dec 9, 5:57 pm, Boater wrote:
wrote:
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 17:50:08 -0500, JohnH wrote:
Besides, looking for the Maryland Red Barn is not
'stalking'. Driving by
my house and taking pictures is.
What did I miss? *I don't remember any pictures of your
house being
posted.
*After* Herring posted the info on our house today, I posted
a URL of a
photo that shows his house and car. But...it wasn't a photo
I took, even
though schitt-for-brains Herring thinks it is.
Harry, what about that 3/4 mile driveway you claim to have
and 5 acre
lawn?
LIAR!

That's the problem. Harry lies so much, he has no chance to
keep his
stories straight. But, I see you've noticed that also.

Don't you worry about losing Harry's friendship calling him
names like
that?

3/4 mile driveway? I never said I had a 3/4 mile driveway. Are
loogy and herringbrain sucking on the same soda straw?

Harry,
It is hard for you to keep up with your stories, but when they
were paving the street you lived on, you actually posted photos
of the street taking from the front of your driveway, pointing up
towards the traffic circle. *You took the photo from the street
and it was highlighting the work they were doing on the street in
the area of traffic circle down the block from your driveway. *It
definitely looked like it was 3/4 mile, but a photo can be
deceptive.

What you really said was:

* My driveway is approximately 200' long, including the portion
that *attaches to our traffic circle, and is 30' wide in spots..
I suspect *your boat on a trailer and your entire family in a
Winnebago would fit *on it."

The traffic circle is no where close to your driveway and is part
of the public street into your small subdivision. *Your driveway
is definitely is not close to being 200' long and 30 ft. wide.

Uh, Reggie...the photo was taken from our driveway. In fact, if I
recall, I was standing inside my garage because the pavers were
out there with hot asphalt. Nice try, though. No sense responding
to the rest of your nonsense. The traffic circle is the end of the
public street, and abuts our property.

It is as usual fun watching you drool over things you don't know.

I did see the photo of your home and neighborhood. The traffic
circle is no where near your driveway. *Why do you fabricate this
and all the other stories? *Your wife has a good job, you don't
need to make her out to be a Dr. Dr., you live in a nice home, you
don't have to pretend you have 200' driveway with a traffic circle
etc. *Enjoy your life and yourself for what it is. *The stories are
just silly, and trust me, no one believes any of them. *+

D'oh. I didn't say the traffic circle was next to my driveway.

Sometime in 2009, my wife *will* be a doctor. When it happens, I'll
be sure to email you the appropriate notice.

Meantime, please let us know when you find a pair, since you
obviously don't have any.

If your wife really is working on his PhD in social work, she is to
be commended. *As I told you at the time, she has chosen a career
where she hopefully can have a positive impact on many people's
lives. *Her career as a social worker is just as valuable of a career
as a medical doctor.

Go **** yourself, Reggie. Better, try to patronize someone dumber than
you are. Herring...Loogy...JustHate...Wally...they come to mind.

I didn't say what sort of doctor my wife would become next year, so
let's not make this post part of your growing mythology.

Thanks.

You don't get it, I am not patronizing you. *I do believe her work as a
social worker can be just as valuable as a medical doctor. * You are the
one who doesn't get it. *But, you are correct, you didn't say what what
her PhD would be in, but it would be a shame for her to change careers
after becoming a successful social worker, with advanced degrees as a
social worker.

But you really do need to keep a list of your lies, in 2007, you told us
you were taking your wife out for very special dinner to celebrate her
completing her PhD program. *Now she will get her PhD in 2009.

Oh what a tangled web we weave,
When first we practice to deceive!

A. I didn't say whether she would or would not be changing careers. *You
are speculating and I am sure it will become part of your urban legend
spreading.

B. Indeed, she completed the academics for her program some time ago. I
doubt I said she had completed the program. You are speculating that
that was all there was to it. You would be wrong. Again.

Again, you need to play with those dumber than you are. I gave you a list..- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Hehehe!!!! Harry's spinning like a top!

Dudes...
 

On Dec 14, 8:02*pm, D K wrote:
Boater wrote:
D.Duck wrote:

Why do you have such disdain for folks that hunt air breathing
creatures but find fishing acceptable?

Because I can. I don't think stalking animals in the woods, and then
shooting them from 200 yards away with a high-powered rifle and scope is
"sport." I'm also disgusted these days by those who fish for sharks and
other mostly inedible pelagics for the "sport" of it.

There's absolutely nothing "manly" about shooting deer or doves or most
other harmless creatures.

Sharks are edible, asshole.

I love shark.

Dudes...
 

On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 11:41:42 -0500, Boater
wrote:

Richard Casady wrote:
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 08:25:23 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

Next year, you will be talking about the beauty and grace
of watching the deer walk through the forest on a foggy morning,
sighting the deer in your sights, and the feel of cold steel against
your cheek, and then slowly pulling the trigger, just so you can enjoy
the sight of blowing Bambi's brains all over the forest.

Bambi is vermin. They got one car of mine. Go for a country drive
around these parts, and you will see more deer than cats, rabbits,
coons, possoms, and skunks, combined. Lots of cars get roadkilled.

Casady


Well, when you intrude upon and destroy animal habitat, they tend to wander.

Man has created most deer habitat, and there are far more deer than
when the white man arrived and started cutting the forest. The second
growth stuff that then grows is what the deer eat. They live at the
edge of the forest, and human activity has created lots of edges and
too many deer.

Casady

Dudes...
 

On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 14:45:09 GMT, (Richard
Casady) wrote:

On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 11:41:42 -0500, Boater
wrote:

Richard Casady wrote:
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 08:25:23 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

Next year, you will be talking about the beauty and grace
of watching the deer walk through the forest on a foggy morning,
sighting the deer in your sights, and the feel of cold steel against
your cheek, and then slowly pulling the trigger, just so you can enjoy
the sight of blowing Bambi's brains all over the forest.

Bambi is vermin. They got one car of mine. Go for a country drive
around these parts, and you will see more deer than cats, rabbits,
coons, possoms, and skunks, combined. Lots of cars get roadkilled.

Well, when you intrude upon and destroy animal habitat, they tend to wander.

Man has created most deer habitat, and there are far more deer than
when the white man arrived and started cutting the forest. The second
growth stuff that then grows is what the deer eat. They live at the
edge of the forest, and human activity has created lots of edges and
too many deer.

That's an excellent point and one that's not often considered.

Plus, as the urban areas expand into surburbia, you are seeing more
and more farmlands intertwined with housing tracts which also creates
problems as the deer forage in fields and backyards.

Dudes...
 

Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 14:45:09 GMT, (Richard
Casady) wrote:

On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 11:41:42 -0500, Boater
wrote:

Richard Casady wrote:
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 08:25:23 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

Next year, you will be talking about the beauty and grace
of watching the deer walk through the forest on a foggy morning,
sighting the deer in your sights, and the feel of cold steel against
your cheek, and then slowly pulling the trigger, just so you can enjoy
the sight of blowing Bambi's brains all over the forest.
Bambi is vermin. They got one car of mine. Go for a country drive
around these parts, and you will see more deer than cats, rabbits,
coons, possoms, and skunks, combined. Lots of cars get roadkilled.
Well, when you intrude upon and destroy animal habitat, they tend to wander.
Man has created most deer habitat, and there are far more deer than
when the white man arrived and started cutting the forest. The second
growth stuff that then grows is what the deer eat. They live at the
edge of the forest, and human activity has created lots of edges and
too many deer.

That's an excellent point and one that's not often considered.

Plus, as the urban areas expand into surburbia, you are seeing more
and more farmlands intertwined with housing tracts which also creates
problems as the deer forage in fields and backyards.


Not that I doubt it (well, maybe a little), but...

....how does anyone really know that there are more deer today in the
United States then when "the white man arrived."

Did the Pilgrims do a scientific deer census in 1620?

Dudes...
 

wrote in message
...
On Dec 14, 11:11 pm, "Don White" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Dec 14, 10:42 pm, "Don White" wrote:



Try minding your own business asshole. That would be appropriate.

You just don't get this open internet group stuff, do you? You
shouldn't really be allowed on line. Do your family members know you
sit around all day making an idiot of yourself? Seems you only open
your mouth to change feet. Dim wit..

**************************************************
Time for you to light up another Georgia Golden Bud.
Don't worry, your buddy will send another 'care package' when your current
supply runs low.

Thanks Don! Now you've accused me of illegal interstate commerce! Be
prepared.

************************************************** **************************

Hee hee...you've implicated yourself.
Did I mention any names? Did I say he's paying for said 'care packages'?

Dudes...
 

Don White wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Dec 14, 11:11 pm, "Don White" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Dec 14, 10:42 pm, "Don White" wrote:



Try minding your own business asshole. That would be appropriate.
You just don't get this open internet group stuff, do you? You
shouldn't really be allowed on line. Do your family members know you
sit around all day making an idiot of yourself? Seems you only open
your mouth to change feet. Dim wit..

**************************************************
Time for you to light up another Georgia Golden Bud.
Don't worry, your buddy will send another 'care package' when your current
supply runs low.

Thanks Don! Now you've accused me of illegal interstate commerce! Be
prepared.

************************************************** **************************

Hee hee...you've implicated yourself.
Did I mention any names? Did I say he's paying for said 'care packages'?



It doesn't matter what you accuse loogy of...if it is stupid and
illegal, he's done it.

Dudes...
 

On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 10:10:55 -0500, Boater
wrote:

Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 14:45:09 GMT, (Richard
Casady) wrote:

On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 11:41:42 -0500, Boater
wrote:

Richard Casady wrote:
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 08:25:23 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

Next year, you will be talking about the beauty and grace
of watching the deer walk through the forest on a foggy morning,
sighting the deer in your sights, and the feel of cold steel against
your cheek, and then slowly pulling the trigger, just so you can enjoy
the sight of blowing Bambi's brains all over the forest.
Bambi is vermin. They got one car of mine. Go for a country drive
around these parts, and you will see more deer than cats, rabbits,
coons, possoms, and skunks, combined. Lots of cars get roadkilled.
Well, when you intrude upon and destroy animal habitat, they tend to wander.
Man has created most deer habitat, and there are far more deer than
when the white man arrived and started cutting the forest. The second
growth stuff that then grows is what the deer eat. They live at the
edge of the forest, and human activity has created lots of edges and
too many deer.

That's an excellent point and one that's not often considered.

Plus, as the urban areas expand into surburbia, you are seeing more
and more farmlands intertwined with housing tracts which also creates
problems as the deer forage in fields and backyards.


Not that I doubt it (well, maybe a little), but...

...how does anyone really know that there are more deer today in the
United States then when "the white man arrived."

Did the Pilgrims do a scientific deer census in 1620?

No. What we do know is how much deer habitat there was then. They
also go ride of the lions, bobcats, and wolves. Nothing in the wild
dies of old age. The gun and the auto have replaced the fang and claw.
Peoples landscaping and crops replace whatever grows in the clearings
when big, old, trees finally fall.

Casady

Dudes...
 

On Dec 15, 1:26*pm, wrote:
On Dec 15, 1:20*pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."





wrote:
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:

On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 14:45:09 GMT, (Richard
Casady) wrote:

On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 11:41:42 -0500, Boater
wrote:

Richard Casady wrote:
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 08:25:23 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.."
wrote:

Next year, you will be talking about the beauty and grace
of watching the deer walk through the forest on a foggy morning,
sighting the deer in your sights, and the feel of cold steel against
your cheek, and then slowly pulling the trigger, just so you can enjoy
the sight of blowing Bambi's brains all over the forest.
Bambi is vermin. They got one car of mine. Go for a country drive
around these parts, and you will see more deer than cats, rabbits,
coons, possoms, and skunks, combined. Lots of cars get roadkilled.
Well, when you intrude upon and destroy animal habitat, they tend to wander.
Man has created most deer habitat, and there are far more deer than
when the white man arrived and started cutting the forest. The second
growth stuff that then grows is what the deer eat. They live at the
edge of the forest, and human activity has created lots of edges and
too many deer.

That's an excellent point and one that's not often considered.

Plus, as the urban areas expand into surburbia, you are seeing more
and more farmlands intertwined with housing tracts which also creates
problems as the deer forage in fields and backyards.

The real problem is when idiots intentionally feed wildlife.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

The funny thing about that is that those types of people, regardless
of the endless amount of data available showing that it is harmful to
both the wildlife and the people, they somehow think they are doing a
good deed. Talk about being narrow minded!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I think you mean self indulgent...

Dudes...
 

On Dec 15, 2:33*pm, wrote:
On Dec 15, 1:26*pm, wrote:





On Dec 15, 1:20*pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."

wrote:
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:

On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 14:45:09 GMT, (Richard
Casady) wrote:

On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 11:41:42 -0500, Boater
wrote:

Richard Casady wrote:
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 08:25:23 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

Next year, you will be talking about the beauty and grace
of watching the deer walk through the forest on a foggy morning,
sighting the deer in your sights, and the feel of cold steel against
your cheek, and then slowly pulling the trigger, just so you can enjoy
the sight of blowing Bambi's brains all over the forest.
Bambi is vermin. They got one car of mine. Go for a country drive
around these parts, and you will see more deer than cats, rabbits,
coons, possoms, and skunks, combined. Lots of cars get roadkilled.
Well, when you intrude upon and destroy animal habitat, they tend to wander.
Man has created most deer habitat, and there are far more deer than
when the white man arrived and started cutting the forest. The second
growth stuff that then grows is what the deer eat. They live at the
edge of the forest, and human activity has created lots of edges and
too many deer.

That's an excellent point and one that's not often considered.

Plus, as the urban areas expand into surburbia, you are seeing more
and more farmlands intertwined with housing tracts which also creates
problems as the deer forage in fields and backyards.

The real problem is when idiots intentionally feed wildlife.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

The funny thing about that is that those types of people, regardless
of the endless amount of data available showing that it is harmful to
both the wildlife and the people, they somehow think they are doing a
good deed. Talk about being narrow minded!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I think you mean self indulgent...- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

That, too! Hey, did you happen to catch the thread where Harry now
says his wife will have some sort of Dr. degree in 2009? I wonder what
happened to the two he claimed she already had?!

Dudes...
 

"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
message ...
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 14:45:09 GMT, (Richard
Casady) wrote:

On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 11:41:42 -0500, Boater
wrote:

Richard Casady wrote:
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 08:25:23 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

Next year, you will be talking about the beauty and grace
of watching the deer walk through the forest on a foggy morning,
sighting the deer in your sights, and the feel of cold steel against
your cheek, and then slowly pulling the trigger, just so you can enjoy
the sight of blowing Bambi's brains all over the forest.

Bambi is vermin. They got one car of mine. Go for a country drive
around these parts, and you will see more deer than cats, rabbits,
coons, possoms, and skunks, combined. Lots of cars get roadkilled.

Well, when you intrude upon and destroy animal habitat, they tend to
wander.

Man has created most deer habitat, and there are far more deer than
when the white man arrived and started cutting the forest. The second
growth stuff that then grows is what the deer eat. They live at the
edge of the forest, and human activity has created lots of edges and
too many deer.

That's an excellent point and one that's not often considered.

Plus, as the urban areas expand into surburbia, you are seeing more
and more farmlands intertwined with housing tracts which also creates
problems as the deer forage in fields and backyards.

20 some years ago when I lived on the far northwest edge of Chicago I would
occasionally see dear walking down the residential streets very early in the
morning on my way to the office.

There was a close by "forest preserve" area that was completely surrounded
by residential areas.

I remember O'Hare airport having a big deer problem. Don't know if it still
exists or if humans have figured out a solution.

Dudes...
 

Don White wrote:
"D K" wrote in message
...
Who the hell is Waylon? One of your cartoon friends again, dummy?


Not too bright , are you?
http://www.thesimpsons.com/bios/bios...e_smithers.htm

Saw your picture there also...
http://www.thesimpsons.com/bios/bios...ideshowbob.htm



I'm not interested in your cartoons, dummy.

"Not too bright" followed by cartoon links? Now *that* funny!

Dudes...
 

Don White wrote:
"D K" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
message ...
On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 13:52:35 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

I am not a religious person, but if you think about it, you have this
all backwards. Someone who is religious will KNOW if a supreme being
does exist, yet someone who isn't religious might not know even if a
supreme being does exist.
And that would be me and I do, indeed exist.

Also, keep tabs on your email for the next few days - something will
be enroute shortly.

Moron. :)
What about that 'package' you sent up to me?
Did you lash it to a donkey and point it towards the border?
Try email, dummy. It's more appropriate.

Try minding your own business asshole. That would be appropriate.



Did your wife scold you today, Donnie? You are rather uptight.

Dudes...
 

Boater wrote:
Don White wrote:
"D K" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote
in message ...
On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 13:52:35 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

I am not a religious person, but if you think about it, you have this
all backwards. Someone who is religious will KNOW if a supreme being
does exist, yet someone who isn't religious might not know even if a
supreme being does exist.
And that would be me and I do, indeed exist.

Also, keep tabs on your email for the next few days - something will
be enroute shortly.

Moron. :)
What about that 'package' you sent up to me?
Did you lash it to a donkey and point it towards the border?
Try email, dummy. It's more appropriate.

Try minding your own business asshole. That would be appropriate.



Shame on you, cavorting with Dickless Krueger... :)

That's pathetic, Krause. Very sad stuff from a "professional writer".
Is Karen proud of these posts? She really should read them. What's her
address again??? Forget it, I have it right here.

Carry on.