On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 16:57:41 -0500, John wrote:


In all this discussion, you've never answered the questions asked by
myself or Tom.

A lot of side-stepping, but no direct answer.

Well Colonel, I'm not in the service. Why in the hell, would I take
orders from you? Answer your own strawman.

On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 16:02:13 -0600, wrote:

On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 16:57:41 -0500, John wrote:


In all this discussion, you've never answered the questions asked by
myself or Tom.

A lot of side-stepping, but no direct answer.

Well Colonel, I'm not in the service. Why in the hell, would I take
orders from you? Answer your own strawman.

Orders?

Have you ever noticed that most liberals, when asked a specific question,
will ignore the question, change the subject, or resort to personal
insults... rather than answer the question?

--
John

John wrote:
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 16:02:13 -0600, wrote:

On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 16:57:41 -0500, John wrote:


In all this discussion, you've never answered the questions asked by
myself or Tom.

A lot of side-stepping, but no direct answer.
Well Colonel, I'm not in the service. Why in the hell, would I take
orders from you? Answer your own strawman.

Orders?

Have you ever noticed that most liberals, when asked a specific question,
will ignore the question, change the subject, or resort to personal
insults... rather than answer the question?



Most liberals would consider you and your questions specious and not
worth the bit of effort it would take to respond.

The more you post, the more it becomes obvious that money spent on the
military is wasted.

wrote:
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 16:57:41 -0500, John wrote:


In all this discussion, you've never answered the questions asked by
myself or Tom.

A lot of side-stepping, but no direct answer.

Well Colonel, I'm not in the service. Why in the hell, would I take
orders from you? Answer your own strawman.


snerk

These "demands" are mostly an attribute of the righties, several of whom
seem to get indignant when you don't play by their rules. Herring does
this, as does BAR, and a few others on that shrinking side of the fence,
as does Loogy, who isn't a rightie, but is just confused.

One of the political discussion boards where I participate a bit has a
few righties who are absolutely rip**** over my failure to respond in
depth to their endless questions about my dislike for Sarah Palin, who
they think will be the GOP's savior in 2012.

Incidentally, there was a fire in Palin's old church...you think maybe
those witches that preacher drove from her returned to extract their
vengence?

On Dec 14, 5:13*pm, Boater wrote:
wrote:
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 16:57:41 -0500, John wrote:

In all this discussion, you've never answered the questions asked by
myself or Tom.

A lot of side-stepping, but no direct answer.

Well Colonel, I'm not in the service. *Why in the hell, would I take
orders from you? *Answer your own strawman.

*snerk

These "demands" are mostly an attribute of the righties, several of whom
seem to get indignant when you don't play by their rules. Herring does
this, as does BAR, and a few others on that shrinking side of the fence,
as does Loogy, who isn't a rightie, but is just confused.

I get indignant about your many, many lies.

wrote in message
t...
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 16:57:41 -0500, John wrote:


In all this discussion, you've never answered the questions asked by
myself or Tom.

A lot of side-stepping, but no direct answer.

Well Colonel, I'm not in the service. Why in the hell, would I take
orders from you? Answer your own strawman.


Well said...The Lt Colonels' own motley irregulars don't follow his orders,
so why should anyone else.