Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Sun, 07 Dec 2008 16:51:16 -0600, wrote: Frankly, I don't give a damn about GM. During normal times, I'd say let them go under, but in these times, I think the risk of letting them fail is too big. The bridge *loan* they are talking about is 1/10 what we have already spent on Wall Street, and only a couple of months of the spending we've been doing in Iraq for years. I understand and I don't think it's funny at all - it is very serious. However, I've been through this - I'm, and you, are old enough to remember '56 which was as bad if not worse than now. We all survived, our father's got new jobs and life went on. Too bad we've lost more than a million jobs in the last year. But I am sure there are jobs aplenty for everyone, including the aging GM workforce. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 07 Dec 2008 19:38:05 -0500, Boater
wrote: Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Sun, 07 Dec 2008 16:51:16 -0600, wrote: Frankly, I don't give a damn about GM. During normal times, I'd say let them go under, but in these times, I think the risk of letting them fail is too big. The bridge *loan* they are talking about is 1/10 what we have already spent on Wall Street, and only a couple of months of the spending we've been doing in Iraq for years. I understand and I don't think it's funny at all - it is very serious. However, I've been through this - I'm, and you, are old enough to remember '56 which was as bad if not worse than now. We all survived, our father's got new jobs and life went on. Too bad we've lost more than a million jobs in the last year. But I am sure there are jobs aplenty for everyone, including the aging GM workforce. Probably are - at Toyota so they can build cars for guys like you who say one thing and do another. You now, being a big time Union backer and flack..er..writer/editor, I'm surprized that you haven't have your tires slashed and your windows broken when you visit all these auto plants and Union job sites you keep talking about. Don't your fellow Unionists support the UAW? Or do they all drive Toyotas? -- "Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin to slit throats." H. L. Mencken |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Sun, 07 Dec 2008 19:38:05 -0500, Boater wrote: Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Sun, 07 Dec 2008 16:51:16 -0600, wrote: Frankly, I don't give a damn about GM. During normal times, I'd say let them go under, but in these times, I think the risk of letting them fail is too big. The bridge *loan* they are talking about is 1/10 what we have already spent on Wall Street, and only a couple of months of the spending we've been doing in Iraq for years. I understand and I don't think it's funny at all - it is very serious. However, I've been through this - I'm, and you, are old enough to remember '56 which was as bad if not worse than now. We all survived, our father's got new jobs and life went on. Too bad we've lost more than a million jobs in the last year. But I am sure there are jobs aplenty for everyone, including the aging GM workforce. Probably are - at Toyota so they can build cars for guys like you who say one thing and do another. You now, being a big time Union backer and flack..er..writer/editor, I'm surprized that you haven't have your tires slashed and your windows broken when you visit all these auto plants and Union job sites you keep talking about. Don't your fellow Unionists support the UAW? Or do they all drive Toyotas? I only drive a Toyota down at the boat ramp. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Boater wrote:
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Sun, 07 Dec 2008 19:38:05 -0500, Boater wrote: Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Sun, 07 Dec 2008 16:51:16 -0600, wrote: Frankly, I don't give a damn about GM. During normal times, I'd say let them go under, but in these times, I think the risk of letting them fail is too big. The bridge *loan* they are talking about is 1/10 what we have already spent on Wall Street, and only a couple of months of the spending we've been doing in Iraq for years. I understand and I don't think it's funny at all - it is very serious. However, I've been through this - I'm, and you, are old enough to remember '56 which was as bad if not worse than now. We all survived, our father's got new jobs and life went on. Too bad we've lost more than a million jobs in the last year. But I am sure there are jobs aplenty for everyone, including the aging GM workforce. Probably are - at Toyota so they can build cars for guys like you who say one thing and do another. You now, being a big time Union backer and flack..er..writer/editor, I'm surprized that you haven't have your tires slashed and your windows broken when you visit all these auto plants and Union job sites you keep talking about. Don't your fellow Unionists support the UAW? Or do they all drive Toyotas? I only drive a Toyota down at the boat ramp. Typical hypocrite. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Boater wrote:
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Sun, 07 Dec 2008 16:51:16 -0600, wrote: Frankly, I don't give a damn about GM. During normal times, I'd say let them go under, but in these times, I think the risk of letting them fail is too big. The bridge *loan* they are talking about is 1/10 what we have already spent on Wall Street, and only a couple of months of the spending we've been doing in Iraq for years. I understand and I don't think it's funny at all - it is very serious. However, I've been through this - I'm, and you, are old enough to remember '56 which was as bad if not worse than now. We all survived, our father's got new jobs and life went on. Too bad we've lost more than a million jobs in the last year. But I am sure there are jobs aplenty for everyone, including the aging GM workforce. It is amazing that as the population increases and more of the youth come onto the rolls of job seekers that we don't have 50, 75 or 100 million people out of work. If we are to believe the naysayers then our percentage of jobless in the USA would increase over time without ever decreasing. The strange thing is that it keeps fluctuating between 4% and 7% regardless of the size of our population? Can you explain any of this Harry? |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
BAR wrote:
Boater wrote: Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Sun, 07 Dec 2008 16:51:16 -0600, wrote: Frankly, I don't give a damn about GM. During normal times, I'd say let them go under, but in these times, I think the risk of letting them fail is too big. The bridge *loan* they are talking about is 1/10 what we have already spent on Wall Street, and only a couple of months of the spending we've been doing in Iraq for years. I understand and I don't think it's funny at all - it is very serious. However, I've been through this - I'm, and you, are old enough to remember '56 which was as bad if not worse than now. We all survived, our father's got new jobs and life went on. Too bad we've lost more than a million jobs in the last year. But I am sure there are jobs aplenty for everyone, including the aging GM workforce. It is amazing that as the population increases and more of the youth come onto the rolls of job seekers that we don't have 50, 75 or 100 million people out of work. If we are to believe the naysayers then our percentage of jobless in the USA would increase over time without ever decreasing. The strange thing is that it keeps fluctuating between 4% and 7% regardless of the size of our population? Can you explain any of this Harry? Of course. It is explained all the time. Perhaps if you stayed in school a bit longer... |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 07:07:36 -0500, BAR wrote:
Boater wrote: Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Sun, 07 Dec 2008 16:51:16 -0600, wrote: Frankly, I don't give a damn about GM. During normal times, I'd say let them go under, but in these times, I think the risk of letting them fail is too big. The bridge *loan* they are talking about is 1/10 what we have already spent on Wall Street, and only a couple of months of the spending we've been doing in Iraq for years. I understand and I don't think it's funny at all - it is very serious. However, I've been through this - I'm, and you, are old enough to remember '56 which was as bad if not worse than now. We all survived, our father's got new jobs and life went on. Too bad we've lost more than a million jobs in the last year. But I am sure there are jobs aplenty for everyone, including the aging GM workforce. It is amazing that as the population increases and more of the youth come onto the rolls of job seekers that we don't have 50, 75 or 100 million people out of work. If we are to believe the naysayers then our percentage of jobless in the USA would increase over time without ever decreasing. The strange thing is that it keeps fluctuating between 4% and 7% regardless of the size of our population? Can you explain any of this Harry? When you add in the 20-40 million illegal immigrants into the equation, who will work for minimum wage, it's easy to see why unemployment of US citizens is so high. -- John H. |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
JohnH wrote:
On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 07:07:36 -0500, BAR wrote: Boater wrote: Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Sun, 07 Dec 2008 16:51:16 -0600, wrote: Frankly, I don't give a damn about GM. During normal times, I'd say let them go under, but in these times, I think the risk of letting them fail is too big. The bridge *loan* they are talking about is 1/10 what we have already spent on Wall Street, and only a couple of months of the spending we've been doing in Iraq for years. I understand and I don't think it's funny at all - it is very serious. However, I've been through this - I'm, and you, are old enough to remember '56 which was as bad if not worse than now. We all survived, our father's got new jobs and life went on. Too bad we've lost more than a million jobs in the last year. But I am sure there are jobs aplenty for everyone, including the aging GM workforce. It is amazing that as the population increases and more of the youth come onto the rolls of job seekers that we don't have 50, 75 or 100 million people out of work. If we are to believe the naysayers then our percentage of jobless in the USA would increase over time without ever decreasing. The strange thing is that it keeps fluctuating between 4% and 7% regardless of the size of our population? Can you explain any of this Harry? When you add in the 20-40 million illegal immigrants into the equation, who will work for minimum wage, it's easy to see why unemployment of US citizens is so high. Ahh...it's the fault of the illegal immigrants. I knew it! snerk |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Can I get a boat loan? | General | |||
A View From London Bridge - HMS Belfast and Tower Bridge | Tall Ship Photos | |||
A View From London Bridge - Tower bridge and Dutch Master | Tall Ship Photos | |||
student loan | General | |||
Yacht Loan and Insurance | General |