About Us

JohnH[_4_]

On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 11:48:20 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 07:34:16 -0500, JohnH
wrote:

Again - The Muslim world hated us well before either Iraq or Afghanistan.

But, I'm glad to hear you love this country. I guess you think 9/11 was
because we invaded Iraq? Or Afghanistan?
--

No but I think our "Tomahawk diplomacy" where we believed we could
rain down death from the sky with impunity had something to do with
it. You notice we stopped showing those bomb sight camera shots on TV
right after that.
Some people seem to forget we bombed Iraq constantly throughout the
90s. We say we weren't really killing anyone, Al Jazerra was saying we
killed about 20,000 civilians. Who do you think they believed?

Iraq *did* invade Kuwait, right? Or was that retribution for something else
*we* did wrong?
--
John H

*Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!*

Boater[_3_]

JohnH wrote:
On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 11:48:20 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 07:34:16 -0500, JohnH
wrote:

Again - The Muslim world hated us well before either Iraq or Afghanistan.

But, I'm glad to hear you love this country. I guess you think 9/11 was
because we invaded Iraq? Or Afghanistan?
--
No but I think our "Tomahawk diplomacy" where we believed we could
rain down death from the sky with impunity had something to do with
it. You notice we stopped showing those bomb sight camera shots on TV
right after that.
Some people seem to forget we bombed Iraq constantly throughout the
90s. We say we weren't really killing anyone, Al Jazerra was saying we
killed about 20,000 civilians. Who do you think they believed?

Iraq *did* invade Kuwait, right? Or was that retribution for something else
*we* did wrong?
--
John H

*Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!*

It makes so much sense to kill civilians who had nothing to do with a
country's government's nastiness. Yep...winning the hearts and minds.

Most of the rational world will be pleased to see Bush back in Texas and
our country again being run by intelligent leaders who usually think
things through *before* invading the wrong country.

Calif Bill

"Boater" wrote in message
...
JohnH wrote:
On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 11:48:20 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 07:34:16 -0500, JohnH
wrote:

Again - The Muslim world hated us well before either Iraq or
Afghanistan.
But, I'm glad to hear you love this country. I guess you think 9/11 was
because we invaded Iraq? Or Afghanistan?
--
No but I think our "Tomahawk diplomacy" where we believed we could
rain down death from the sky with impunity had something to do with
it. You notice we stopped showing those bomb sight camera shots on TV
right after that.
Some people seem to forget we bombed Iraq constantly throughout the
90s. We say we weren't really killing anyone, Al Jazerra was saying we
killed about 20,000 civilians. Who do you think they believed?

Iraq *did* invade Kuwait, right? Or was that retribution for something
else
*we* did wrong?
--
John H

*Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!*

It makes so much sense to kill civilians who had nothing to do with a
country's government's nastiness. Yep...winning the hearts and minds.

Most of the rational world will be pleased to see Bush back in Texas and
our country again being run by intelligent leaders who usually think
things through *before* invading the wrong country.

Maybe they should not have let the nasties rule the country. So the
civilians are also guilty. Just like Japan and Germany in WW2. Took lots
of civilians to support the troops.

Boater[_3_]

Calif Bill wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message
...
JohnH wrote:
On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 11:48:20 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 07:34:16 -0500, JohnH
wrote:

Again - The Muslim world hated us well before either Iraq or
Afghanistan.
But, I'm glad to hear you love this country. I guess you think 9/11 was
because we invaded Iraq? Or Afghanistan?
--
No but I think our "Tomahawk diplomacy" where we believed we could
rain down death from the sky with impunity had something to do with
it. You notice we stopped showing those bomb sight camera shots on TV
right after that.
Some people seem to forget we bombed Iraq constantly throughout the
90s. We say we weren't really killing anyone, Al Jazerra was saying we
killed about 20,000 civilians. Who do you think they believed?
Iraq *did* invade Kuwait, right? Or was that retribution for something
else
*we* did wrong?
--
John H

*Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!*

It makes so much sense to kill civilians who had nothing to do with a
country's government's nastiness. Yep...winning the hearts and minds.

Most of the rational world will be pleased to see Bush back in Texas and
our country again being run by intelligent leaders who usually think
things through *before* invading the wrong country.

Maybe they should not have let the nasties rule the country. So the
civilians are also guilty. Just like Japan and Germany in WW2. Took lots
of civilians to support the troops.

Obviously, you know nothing about pre-war or wartime Japanese society,
or the chokehold the Nazis had on Germany.

Calif Bill

"Boater" wrote in message
...
Calif Bill wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message
...
JohnH wrote:
On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 11:48:20 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 07:34:16 -0500, JohnH
wrote:

Again - The Muslim world hated us well before either Iraq or
Afghanistan.
But, I'm glad to hear you love this country. I guess you think 9/11
was
because we invaded Iraq? Or Afghanistan?
--
No but I think our "Tomahawk diplomacy" where we believed we could
rain down death from the sky with impunity had something to do with
it. You notice we stopped showing those bomb sight camera shots on TV
right after that.
Some people seem to forget we bombed Iraq constantly throughout the
90s. We say we weren't really killing anyone, Al Jazerra was saying we
killed about 20,000 civilians. Who do you think they believed?
Iraq *did* invade Kuwait, right? Or was that retribution for something
else
*we* did wrong?
--
John H

*Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!*

It makes so much sense to kill civilians who had nothing to do with a
country's government's nastiness. Yep...winning the hearts and minds.

Most of the rational world will be pleased to see Bush back in Texas and
our country again being run by intelligent leaders who usually think
things through *before* invading the wrong country.

Maybe they should not have let the nasties rule the country. So the
civilians are also guilty. Just like Japan and Germany in WW2. Took
lots of civilians to support the troops.

Obviously, you know nothing about pre-war or wartime Japanese society, or
the chokehold the Nazis had on Germany.

Does not matter. Still takes civilians to support the troops. You do not
think Germans would of bombed US civilians if they could?

Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.[_3_]

Calif Bill wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message
...
Calif Bill wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message
...
JohnH wrote:
On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 11:48:20 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 07:34:16 -0500, JohnH
wrote:

Again - The Muslim world hated us well before either Iraq or
Afghanistan.
But, I'm glad to hear you love this country. I guess you think 9/11
was
because we invaded Iraq? Or Afghanistan?
--
No but I think our "Tomahawk diplomacy" where we believed we could
rain down death from the sky with impunity had something to do with
it. You notice we stopped showing those bomb sight camera shots on TV
right after that.
Some people seem to forget we bombed Iraq constantly throughout the
90s. We say we weren't really killing anyone, Al Jazerra was saying we
killed about 20,000 civilians. Who do you think they believed?
Iraq *did* invade Kuwait, right? Or was that retribution for something
else
*we* did wrong?
--
John H

*Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!*
It makes so much sense to kill civilians who had nothing to do with a
country's government's nastiness. Yep...winning the hearts and minds.

Most of the rational world will be pleased to see Bush back in Texas and
our country again being run by intelligent leaders who usually think
things through *before* invading the wrong country.
Maybe they should not have let the nasties rule the country. So the
civilians are also guilty. Just like Japan and Germany in WW2. Took
lots of civilians to support the troops.
Obviously, you know nothing about pre-war or wartime Japanese society, or
the chokehold the Nazis had on Germany.

Does not matter. Still takes civilians to support the troops. You do not
think Germans would of bombed US civilians if they could?

The Germans were working on a way to bomb NYC. The Japanese actually
bombed Oregon and also sent Firebomb balloons across the Pacific to
randomly set fires along the west coast. Neither were very successful.
The firebomb balloons resulted in very little damage and a handful of
deaths.

JohnH[_4_]

On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 18:51:54 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

Calif Bill wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message
...
Calif Bill wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message
...
JohnH wrote:
On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 11:48:20 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 07:34:16 -0500, JohnH
wrote:

Again - The Muslim world hated us well before either Iraq or
Afghanistan.
But, I'm glad to hear you love this country. I guess you think 9/11
was
because we invaded Iraq? Or Afghanistan?
--
No but I think our "Tomahawk diplomacy" where we believed we could
rain down death from the sky with impunity had something to do with
it. You notice we stopped showing those bomb sight camera shots on TV
right after that.
Some people seem to forget we bombed Iraq constantly throughout the
90s. We say we weren't really killing anyone, Al Jazerra was saying we
killed about 20,000 civilians. Who do you think they believed?
Iraq *did* invade Kuwait, right? Or was that retribution for something
else
*we* did wrong?
--
John H

*Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!*
It makes so much sense to kill civilians who had nothing to do with a
country's government's nastiness. Yep...winning the hearts and minds.

Most of the rational world will be pleased to see Bush back in Texas and
our country again being run by intelligent leaders who usually think
things through *before* invading the wrong country.
Maybe they should not have let the nasties rule the country. So the
civilians are also guilty. Just like Japan and Germany in WW2. Took
lots of civilians to support the troops.
Obviously, you know nothing about pre-war or wartime Japanese society, or
the chokehold the Nazis had on Germany.

Does not matter. Still takes civilians to support the troops. You do not
think Germans would of bombed US civilians if they could?

The Germans were working on a way to bomb NYC. The Japanese actually
bombed Oregon and also sent Firebomb balloons across the Pacific to
randomly set fires along the west coast. Neither were very successful.
The firebomb balloons resulted in very little damage and a handful of
deaths.

Were *any* civilians killed? Well, if it were only American civilians,
that's OK.
--
John H

*Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!*

JohnH[_4_]

On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 17:40:54 -0500, Boater wrote:

JohnH wrote:
On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 11:48:20 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 07:34:16 -0500, JohnH
wrote:

Again - The Muslim world hated us well before either Iraq or Afghanistan.

But, I'm glad to hear you love this country. I guess you think 9/11 was
because we invaded Iraq? Or Afghanistan?
--
No but I think our "Tomahawk diplomacy" where we believed we could
rain down death from the sky with impunity had something to do with
it. You notice we stopped showing those bomb sight camera shots on TV
right after that.
Some people seem to forget we bombed Iraq constantly throughout the
90s. We say we weren't really killing anyone, Al Jazerra was saying we
killed about 20,000 civilians. Who do you think they believed?

Iraq *did* invade Kuwait, right? Or was that retribution for something else
*we* did wrong?
--
John H

*Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!*

It makes so much sense to kill civilians who had nothing to do with a
country's government's nastiness. Yep...winning the hearts and minds.

Most of the rational world will be pleased to see Bush back in Texas and
our country again being run by intelligent leaders who usually think
things through *before* invading the wrong country.

I wonder if anyone told Saddam or Osama that?
--
John H

*Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!*

JohnH[_4_]

On Thu, 04 Dec 2008 11:24:27 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 17:31:36 -0500, JohnH
wrote:

No but I think our "Tomahawk diplomacy" where we believed we could
rain down death from the sky with impunity had something to do with
it. You notice we stopped showing those bomb sight camera shots on TV
right after that.
Some people seem to forget we bombed Iraq constantly throughout the
90s. We say we weren't really killing anyone, Al Jazerra was saying we
killed about 20,000 civilians. Who do you think they believed?

Iraq *did* invade Kuwait, right? Or was that retribution for something else
*we* did wrong?

Yes Iraq invaded Kuwait and we kicked their ass out. Powell and Bush 1
were right to avoid going to Baghdad then. Where they made the mistake
was to continue the air war for another decade. For those who blame
Bush 2 I have to remind you, the US government, in the name of Bill
Clinton threatened the invasion of Iraq in 1998 for ignoring UN
resolutions and set the stage for GW's invasion. Mr Clinton thought
they had WMDs too. Saddam gave us the finger. Bush 2 saw this as a
question of whether he should back up US threats with action or simply
back down.
Again, if we had not started the war with Saddam, Israel would have
and we would have been dragged in to support them, a worse scenario
from an international view.

And, of course, the UN played no part in any of this.
--
John H

*Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!*

JohnH[_4_]

On Thu, 04 Dec 2008 19:14:54 -0500, wrote:

On Thu, 04 Dec 2008 13:24:15 -0500, JohnH
wrote:

Iraq *did* invade Kuwait, right? Or was that retribution for something else
*we* did wrong?

Yes Iraq invaded Kuwait and we kicked their ass out. Powell and Bush 1
were right to avoid going to Baghdad then. Where they made the mistake
was to continue the air war for another decade. For those who blame
Bush 2 I have to remind you, the US government, in the name of Bill
Clinton threatened the invasion of Iraq in 1998 for ignoring UN
resolutions and set the stage for GW's invasion. Mr Clinton thought
they had WMDs too. Saddam gave us the finger. Bush 2 saw this as a
question of whether he should back up US threats with action or simply
back down.
Again, if we had not started the war with Saddam, Israel would have
and we would have been dragged in to support them, a worse scenario
from an international view.

And, of course, the UN played no part in any of this.

The UN is like that big mouth girl who likes to start a fight for her
boy friend to finish.
Sometimes I think we should leave and let the bitch get her ass beat.

There you go. We finally agree. So, let's blame the UN and quit badmouthing
the USA every time we get a chance.
--
John H

*Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!*

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
alt.california, alt.rush-limbaugh, alt.impeach.bush, alt.politics.gw-bush, alt.politics.usa.republican, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.society.liberalism, alt.politics.republicans, alt.culture.alaska,rec.boats	[email protected]	General	2	December 7th 08 11:59 AM
Port Security	Joe	ASA	22	March 22nd 06 04:22 AM
security website	Webmaster	General	0	October 18th 05 02:36 AM

Menu

About Us