| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Geithner, Clinton, Richardson in Obama's Cabinet
Boater wrote:
BAR wrote: wrote: On Sat, 22 Nov 2008 07:11:35 -0500, Eisboch wrote: I don't disagree, but this transition period is not typical. The situation requires an indication of intent now, not later, as demonstrated by the reaction on Wall Street when the news of his nominations to be made on Monday were leaked. Personally, I find it interesting that all these leaks are now coming from a very disciplined and tight lipped campaign. I'm guessing he's floating names for a response. The timing on Geithner's "leak" was brilliant. The Obama is being handled by the Clintons. snerk The American voters "handled" the Republicans this time, just as they should be handled. The Republicans were punished. Your assertions really are hysterically funny. Obama, who was not my first choice for nominee, handily outsmarted the Clintons during the primaries, and tied the Republicans up in knots during the general election, turning a handful of red states blue. Obama only got the nomination because of his early wins in the smaller states. And, because Hillary did not take him seriously enough. I was delighted for the opportunity to vote for Obama on election day, not only because I thought him by far the best candidate for office, but because I just knew he would drive the social conservative simpies nuts. Both Obama and McCain provided poor choices on election day. |
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Geithner, Clinton, Richardson in Obama's Cabinet
BAR wrote:
Boater wrote: BAR wrote: wrote: On Sat, 22 Nov 2008 07:11:35 -0500, Eisboch wrote: I don't disagree, but this transition period is not typical. The situation requires an indication of intent now, not later, as demonstrated by the reaction on Wall Street when the news of his nominations to be made on Monday were leaked. Personally, I find it interesting that all these leaks are now coming from a very disciplined and tight lipped campaign. I'm guessing he's floating names for a response. The timing on Geithner's "leak" was brilliant. The Obama is being handled by the Clintons. snerk The American voters "handled" the Republicans this time, just as they should be handled. The Republicans were punished. Your assertions really are hysterically funny. Obama, who was not my first choice for nominee, handily outsmarted the Clintons during the primaries, and tied the Republicans up in knots during the general election, turning a handful of red states blue. Obama only got the nomination because of his early wins in the smaller states. And, because Hillary did not take him seriously enough. I was delighted for the opportunity to vote for Obama on election day, not only because I thought him by far the best candidate for office, but because I just knew he would drive the social conservative simpies nuts. Both Obama and McCain provided poor choices on election day. Your brand of social conservatism will never again elect a president of the United States. On another, equally happy note, I was pleased as punch the GOP resurrected Saul Alinsky. Saul would have been tickled. I know that, first-hand. :) |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Geithner, Clinton, Richardson in Obama's Cabinet
Boater wrote:
BAR wrote: Boater wrote: BAR wrote: wrote: On Sat, 22 Nov 2008 07:11:35 -0500, Eisboch wrote: I don't disagree, but this transition period is not typical. The situation requires an indication of intent now, not later, as demonstrated by the reaction on Wall Street when the news of his nominations to be made on Monday were leaked. Personally, I find it interesting that all these leaks are now coming from a very disciplined and tight lipped campaign. I'm guessing he's floating names for a response. The timing on Geithner's "leak" was brilliant. The Obama is being handled by the Clintons. snerk The American voters "handled" the Republicans this time, just as they should be handled. The Republicans were punished. Your assertions really are hysterically funny. Obama, who was not my first choice for nominee, handily outsmarted the Clintons during the primaries, and tied the Republicans up in knots during the general election, turning a handful of red states blue. Obama only got the nomination because of his early wins in the smaller states. And, because Hillary did not take him seriously enough. I was delighted for the opportunity to vote for Obama on election day, not only because I thought him by far the best candidate for office, but because I just knew he would drive the social conservative simpies nuts. Both Obama and McCain provided poor choices on election day. Your brand of social conservatism will never again elect a president of the United States. If the country turns towards socialism it is no longer the United States of America, a country based upon personal liberty, private property and freedom from the tyranny of government. On another, equally happy note, I was pleased as punch the GOP resurrected Saul Alinsky. Saul would have been tickled. I know that, first-hand. :) We, collectively, have become lazy and envious of those who have worked hard. Socialism fails under the weight of its vast majority of unproductive and under-productive members. Social Security is a prime example of a Socialist program that is failing and will soon crush those few who are productive supporting those who are not productive. Why do those who work owe those who don't work anything at all? |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Geithner, Clinton, Richardson in Obama's Cabinet
Boater wrote:
BAR wrote: Boater wrote: BAR wrote: Boater wrote: BAR wrote: wrote: On Sat, 22 Nov 2008 07:11:35 -0500, Eisboch wrote: I don't disagree, but this transition period is not typical. The situation requires an indication of intent now, not later, as demonstrated by the reaction on Wall Street when the news of his nominations to be made on Monday were leaked. Personally, I find it interesting that all these leaks are now coming from a very disciplined and tight lipped campaign. I'm guessing he's floating names for a response. The timing on Geithner's "leak" was brilliant. The Obama is being handled by the Clintons. snerk The American voters "handled" the Republicans this time, just as they should be handled. The Republicans were punished. Your assertions really are hysterically funny. Obama, who was not my first choice for nominee, handily outsmarted the Clintons during the primaries, and tied the Republicans up in knots during the general election, turning a handful of red states blue. Obama only got the nomination because of his early wins in the smaller states. And, because Hillary did not take him seriously enough. I was delighted for the opportunity to vote for Obama on election day, not only because I thought him by far the best candidate for office, but because I just knew he would drive the social conservative simpies nuts. Both Obama and McCain provided poor choices on election day. Your brand of social conservatism will never again elect a president of the United States. If the country turns towards socialism it is no longer the United States of America, a country based upon personal liberty, private property and freedom from the tyranny of government. On another, equally happy note, I was pleased as punch the GOP resurrected Saul Alinsky. Saul would have been tickled. I know that, first-hand. :) We, collectively, have become lazy and envious of those who have worked hard. Socialism fails under the weight of its vast majority of unproductive and under-productive members. Social Security is a prime example of a Socialist program that is failing and will soon crush those few who are productive supporting those who are not productive. Why do those who work owe those who don't work anything at all? Don't slam the door on your way out of the country. What do I as a productive member of society owe a lazy person who refuses to work? |
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Geithner, Clinton, Richardson in Obama's Cabinet
Boater wrote:
BAR wrote: Boater wrote: BAR wrote: Boater wrote: BAR wrote: wrote: On Sat, 22 Nov 2008 07:11:35 -0500, Eisboch wrote: I don't disagree, but this transition period is not typical. The situation requires an indication of intent now, not later, as demonstrated by the reaction on Wall Street when the news of his nominations to be made on Monday were leaked. Personally, I find it interesting that all these leaks are now coming from a very disciplined and tight lipped campaign. I'm guessing he's floating names for a response. The timing on Geithner's "leak" was brilliant. The Obama is being handled by the Clintons. snerk The American voters "handled" the Republicans this time, just as they should be handled. The Republicans were punished. Your assertions really are hysterically funny. Obama, who was not my first choice for nominee, handily outsmarted the Clintons during the primaries, and tied the Republicans up in knots during the general election, turning a handful of red states blue. Obama only got the nomination because of his early wins in the smaller states. And, because Hillary did not take him seriously enough. I was delighted for the opportunity to vote for Obama on election day, not only because I thought him by far the best candidate for office, but because I just knew he would drive the social conservative simpies nuts. Both Obama and McCain provided poor choices on election day. Your brand of social conservatism will never again elect a president of the United States. If the country turns towards socialism it is no longer the United States of America, a country based upon personal liberty, private property and freedom from the tyranny of government. On another, equally happy note, I was pleased as punch the GOP resurrected Saul Alinsky. Saul would have been tickled. I know that, first-hand. :) We, collectively, have become lazy and envious of those who have worked hard. Socialism fails under the weight of its vast majority of unproductive and under-productive members. Social Security is a prime example of a Socialist program that is failing and will soon crush those few who are productive supporting those who are not productive. Why do those who work owe those who don't work anything at all? Don't slam the door on your way out of the country. The social security system was self funded until the democrats diverted the funds to other social welfare programs. It use to be called social security insurance because it was self funded. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Cabinet scraper | Boat Building | |||
| Caned cabinet doors? | Cruising | |||
| Caned cabinet doors? | Boat Building | |||
| Richardson Autopilot looking for info | Electronics | |||
![BAR[_3_] is offline](https://www.boatbanter.com/images/SultanThemeVB3R/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Hybrid Mode
