Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:
wrote:
On Sat, 22 Nov 2008 07:11:35 -0500, Eisboch wrote:
I don't disagree, but this transition period is not typical. The
situation requires an indication of intent now, not later, as
demonstrated by the reaction on Wall Street when the news of his
nominations to be made on Monday were leaked.
Personally, I find it interesting that all these leaks are now coming
from a very disciplined and tight lipped campaign. I'm guessing he's
floating names for a response. The timing on Geithner's "leak" was
brilliant.
The Obama is being handled by the Clintons.
snerk
The American voters "handled" the Republicans this time, just as they
should be handled.
Your assertions really are hysterically funny. Obama, who was not my
first choice for nominee, handily outsmarted the Clintons during the
primaries, and tied the Republicans up in knots during the general
election, turning a handful of red states blue.
I was delighted for the opportunity to vote for Obama on election day,
not only because I thought him by far the best candidate for office, but
because I just knew he would drive the social conservative simpies nuts.
obama has not made a move with out the approval of the old line
democrats. If you believe otherwise you must believe in the Tooth Fairy,
Santa Clause and the Easter Bunny. They would not even let him come
back to Washington when they had it set up for pelosi to discredit John
McClain with the first bailout vote.
We got another look at obama "Change" this morning, with the
announcement he is wants Roosevelt's failed make-work programs of the
thirties for his economic policy for 2009.