Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It sure looks like GM may go down the tubes.
Their burn rate of available cash may not last until Obama takes office. According to some analysts, Chapter 11, which keeps the creditors and suppliers off their backs while they reorganize really isn't an option. Who would buy a car from a company in bankruptcy? Furthermore, consumers have pulled in their horns in terms of buying big ticket items in general with concern of continued employment. There's a 25 billion dollar government "loan" available to the auto industry in general that is intended to help them finance the development of new, high efficiency vehicles. Bush has recommended expediting the release of funds associated with this loan, but is against a further "bailout" using funds from the recent 700 billion TARP plan. GM's burn rate is 3.1 million per *hour* and as of the end of September, they had about 16 billion in cash. Personally, I have very mixed feelings about this. A while back GM dropped the Oldsmobile line due to poor sales and to cut costs. They also hinted that another line .... either Buick or Pontiac .... would be on the chopping block in the future if their financial situation didn't change. That was a couple of years ago and nothing has been done. Although it would be disastrous for the employees and suppliers for GM to fold, I also can't see why the taxpayers should spend good money after bad. The only way I personally could support a general bailout would be if it were tied to a very specific and aggressive business plan laid out by GM that would cut costs, simplify operations and overhead and otherwise provide believable proof that the bailout money would not simply extend their existence for a while longer while business goes on as usual. GM had the opportunity to address their problems and have done very little to save themselves. Their problems did not originate with September's market meltdown. The other problem with bailing GM out is that it sets a precedent to justify the bailout of any company experiencing financial problems. How do you save a job here, but let an equally important job to someone else in another company dissolve? Eisboch |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
What's My Line? | ASA | |||
Pro-Line Boats | Cruising | |||
Line by line debunking of latest BuSh attack ad..... | General | |||
FS: Anchor Line in NY | Marketplace |