View Single Post
  #4   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Eisboch Eisboch is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,091
Default End of the line?


"Boater" wrote in message
...

Management, labor, and suppliers are going to have to eat some of the
weenie if they want the companies to survive. There are millions more
jobs at stake here than just those at the auto plants.

As for what Bush recommends, well, he ought to just leave town before he
does any more damage.




Hold on to your chair Harry. I don't want you to flop over.

Mrs.E. and I were discussing the economic problems this morning while having
coffee, trying to sort out what type of government led programs would serve
to point towards an eventual recovery.

I've come to realize that the current situation is unlike anything in the
past. I know it's subject to great debate, but Reagan led the country out
of Carter's mess by applying a "trickle down" philosophy that enabled big
companies to expand and grow, carrying the smaller subcontractors along with
them. For conditions at the time it worked.

Those conditions don't exist anymore. Manufacturing is gone.

I come around to recognizing that Obama is the right man for the job right
now. McCain is too unimaginative and stuck in the past to solve the
problems of 2008 and beyond.

Like the current Time cover suggests, Obama is going to have to focus on
internal infrastructure programs designed to produce jobs (even if the
particular program isn't completely necessary). It will be a "trickle-up"
approach rather than the other way around. A recovery is going to have to
include the need and reason for a business to exist, not simply the issuance
of a bunch of new contracts.

In the case of the auto industry, every one involved is going to have to
accept a new set of conditions and rewards, from management to the labor
unions. New management *is* required with a fresh, blank sheet to develop
the business model. There will still be layoffs, cuts and downsizing
required. The market simply doesn't support the combined sizes of GM, Ford
and Chrysler (although I doubt Chrysler will remain much longer).

And the consumer .... the car buyer ... needs to have a job with a secure
income in order to purchase the new car, house or other consumer related
product. Herein is the big problem that makes this situation unique.
Without manufacturing, there are no jobs. Everyone cannot be employed in
the service or entertainment sectors. Consumer spending makes up 70% of our
economy.

This country has some very serious problems and they cannot be solved by
simply turning back the clock.

I wish I knew how to help. I don't mean helping by just supporting any
particular leader or program. I mean actively *help*.

Eisboch