"JeffM" wrote in
oups.com:

Evgenij Barsukov wrote:
I would not call it a spam,
as topic of the book is relevant to this group
and from looking at the table of contents it appears to be
interesting.
Yevgen

That's one metric.

One time announcements of production relevant to
news group topic are not prohibited by the [charter].

There other parameters that determine what is spam spewing:
http://66.102.9.104/search?q=cache:P...pam.org/usenet
/mmf/breidbart.html+Monty.Python+*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-Baked-Beans-*-
*+*-*-*-*-will-*-mark-a-crossposted-article-as-read+Multiposting+Excess
ive-Multi-Posting+*-*-*-*-*-it's-good-behaviour+originally-*-*-*-EMPs-o
nly

This one doesn't pass the stink test.



The first we see of this in sci.electronics.components is this hugely
crossposted reply from jeffm. Without that this clutter might never have
entered the group? So, what EXACTLY is spam? What is the rationale for this
posting??