Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
posted to rec.boats.cruising,rec.boats.electronics,rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
New Marine WiFi Product
From that I infer that you do your surfing from the AP to the bridge.
Or, do you have to unhook the ethernet and do it by hooking it to your NIC? Either way, do you have to make your interface the same IP family, or can it do it over dhcp? The shore link client is running DHCP. The in boat device is not, just as an access point. So when a laptop connects it's getting it's IP address through the access point from the router. This means there's nothing to do on the laptops other than select the 'boat' SSID. I never have to connect any wires to the laptops to handle configuring anything. The wiring runs from the device in the arch, wired ethernet to a 5 port switch belowdecks. The in boat device (access point) is also wired into this. I could've just connected the two directly together but having this switch gives me some expansion options. Actually, two other ports are already connected to the Raymarine E-80 and Sirius weather interfaces. Works great. At some point I'll be connected a 'permanent' PC into the boat for engine data, logging and web cam and that'll go in the 5th remaining port. The access point has 4 of it's own switch ports but I chose not to use them as it would've meant running more and longer wires from the raymarine gear (Hassle and $$$). So if I really needed 'more' wired ports I could just use the ones on the access point. And the device in the arch also has 4 more ports free but again, wiring hassles make it unlikely I'll bother with them. Turned down the radio's transmission mW setting until it just barely covers more than the cockpit region of the boat. Ended up being about 9mW. Pretty cool. I assume that's also done on web interface, with a mouse click or perhaps direct entry? Are these the usual 40mw or something else? 28mW is the usual. I've tuned the in-boat device to about 8mW and that seems to work nicely. Simple web page selection, and not one that gets changed for typical use. I'd had the same idea - but don't know how much power they take. I'm in a twin engined powerboat. I don't know, nor care about their power consumption. I only run them when I actually need to use them. In my case, it will be up the mast; if I have both units in that NEMA, it would take two POE units. OTOH, what would both of them draw (so I could figure out what size wire I'd have to run to them)? I'm not the one to task as I've run a separate power line for each of them. I believe it was 14 gauge wire I used to avoid voltage drop. I've no idea what Power Over Ethernet would require but I'm sure a web search would be enlightening. Ditto - but mine has the other item in spades, where she can call her kids and her mother, and for that matter, as she did Sunday, her twin in Hong Kong and her sister in England, on a three-way, all over wifi. I have yet to hook up the new Vonage router and double phone set, but I expect it will do just fine - and it's another 12v item :{)) Yeah, the VOIP thing would certainly be interesting and should we need it the network's there to support it. But our cell phone coverage and plans are more than sufficient to handle our calling needs here on the Chesapeake. Were we calling or travelling internationally we'd certainly look into it. I've heard plenty of horror stories about Vonage and other lowball VOIP providers. Mainly that their voice quality sucks (even with excellent connectivity). Along with that it's easier to get rid of a venereal disease than to unsubscribe from their services. -Bill Kearney |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
WaterWheel Product Manufacturing, Sealing & Finishing | Boat Building | |||
2005 West Marine catalog announed | General | |||
Just a few names... | General | |||
paradise cove trip | ASA | |||
The same people | ASA |