Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ian Malcolm wrote:
snip USB is designed to be low cost to implement in a peripheral device, but the tradeoff is it requires a lot of code and a fairly large amount of CPU performance to implement for the host. A serial port just doesn't support a high enough transfer rate to communicate with a USB device. Therefore the PC *must* be on the USB side of the converter. Okay, I guess that makes sense. I thought maybe everything needed to handle the translation both ways was in the PL2303 or whatever in the adapter. Thanks for the help. Jack -- Jack Erbes in Ellsworth, Maine, USA - jackerbes at adelphia dot net (also receiving email at jacker at midmaine.com) |