Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 23:45:06 GMT, chuck wrote:
Am I missing something here? Surely the RG-58 wouldn't be attached to a PL-259 without a UG-175 reducing adapter, would it? Is it being said that even with the UG-175, there is insufficient strain relief? in my opinion the answer is there is insufficient strain relief for critical applications. the jacket of thicker cables, such as rg 213, when inserted into the pl 259, provide quite a bit of support for the connector. --------------------------- to see who "wf3h" is, go to "qrz.com" and enter 'wf3h' in the field |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
SSB Antenna connection | Electronics | |||
Notes on short SSB antennas, for Larry | Cruising | |||
Notes on short SSB antennas, for Larry | Electronics | |||
How to use a simple SWR meter and what it means to your VHF | Electronics |