Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
engsol
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 19:25:40 +0100, "Meindert Sprang" wrote:

"engsol" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 07:02:18 +0100, "Meindert Sprang"

wrote:

When you are installing this stuff for living, you very soon learn to
appreciate the absence of fixed connectors on cables..... or do you want

to
make all holes in bulkeads bug enough for all connectors to push
through..... just once.....

Meindert


Am I over looking something? Can't the cable be routed,
then the connectors installed? Might make a neater
installation, avoiding coils of excess cable....or cables
which might be too short.


No, you're not overlooking. But it just feels plain stupid to first cut the
plugs, route the cables and then reassemble them. What would you like to do
most: solder a plug with tiny contacts or just strip the wire, crimp on a
pin and screw them into a screw terminal?

And believe me, it's not just theory but this is backed up with
measurements: a 4800 baud signal is just not going to produce interference
because the last inch is not screened and connected to screw terminals. They
are physically too small to be able to radiate enough energy to interfere
with an SSB.

Meindert


Yep, soldering tiny pins is no fun. I agree 100% that 'strip n crimp'
is the way to go. When I was doing embedded controllers for
ag equipment, I used 3M plastic circular mating connectors. They had the
advantage of strain relief and some protection from dust and moisture,
to say nothing of accidential shorting.

As to 4800 baud radiating for 1 inch unshielded...not much chance of that.
The only exception might be if the rise time of the pulses was quick
enough...often seen in switching power supplies....to cause the old
'comb' of harmonics.
Norm B
  #2   Report Post  
Meindert Sprang
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"engsol" wrote in message
...

As to 4800 baud radiating for 1 inch unshielded...not much chance of that.
The only exception might be if the rise time of the pulses was quick
enough...often seen in switching power supplies....to cause the old
'comb' of harmonics.


Indeed, that's why any decently designed device should have some form of
limit to the risetime, which is not hard at all. We simply put an RC network
on each dataline. But also having galvanically isolated inputs, which is
dictated by the NMEA standard, will ensure a proper balance in both wires of
an NMEA connection, ensuring minimal radiation. The problem is however, that
many manufacturers try to cut corners here.

Meindert


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GpsMap 276C NMEA Interface Problem Pascal Goncalves Electronics 3 March 2nd 05 01:02 PM
Wireless 802.11 NMEA server Todd Electronics 79 February 3rd 05 07:35 AM
Essentials of a Marine Boat Alarm System Rick Curtis Electronics 19 February 23rd 04 09:42 AM
NMEA mutiplexer Gabriel Latrémouille Electronics 19 October 22nd 03 10:17 PM
NMEA Noise in SSB Keith Electronics 7 September 28th 03 05:51 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:39 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017