Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello Gary,
You've posted some interesting information. I wondered about the inherent non-linearities and, of course, the deviation at which the SINADs were measured is not known, either. So the question boils down to whether modern VHF receivers for marine use are likely to have noticeably different sensitivity performance. As you know, SINAD is a measure of "useful sensitivity" and the noise plus distortion part of SINAD (rather than the signal part) is what is probably affecting the differences in VHF receiver SINAD measurement. Taking the issue into the realm of the real world, Icom quotes the following for their IC-F4GT/GS radios: 0.3 microvolts for 12 dB SINAD 0.79 microvolts for 20 dB SINAD The TK3160E UHF Transceiver reports similar results: 0.25 microvolts for 12 dB SINAD 0.63 microvolts for 20 dB SINAD These both work out to Meindert's results very closely. So we know that by assuming linearity, we are not necessarily wildly out of the ballpark. I'm not sure how you derived the distortion percentages you mentioned, but normally a receiver's distortion figure would be measured with an input signal on the order of 0.5 to 1.0 volt to ensure that noise doesn't affect the measurement. Under these conditions, a SINAD reading of 12 dB corresponds to 25% distortion, while a reading of 20 dB corresponds to 10% distortion. 73, Chuck |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS: Standard Horizon CP-150 display and receiver in RI | Marketplace | |||
Original NASA Navtex Receiver: | UK Power Boats | |||
Micrologic DGPS Receiver Model ML-9100 | Electronics | |||
SSB Weatherfax Receiver | Electronics | |||
gps receiver for JRC 1000 radar | Electronics |