Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats.electronics,uk.rec.sailing,rec.boats.cruising,sci.geo.satellite-nav
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Steve Firth" wrote in message .. . Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 11:22:42 +0100, Boo wrote: I understood that "selective availability mk2" (or whatever it's known as) is the capability to selectively deny access to GPS signals over limited geographical areas, maybe this has some bearing ? It would be limited mostly to "line of sight" distances, and Cuba is not known for being a technical power house with unlimited financial resources. You and the previous poster are giving the appearance of not knowing what selective availability (SA) is. SA is a feature of GPS that permits the civilian positioning feature of GPS to be subject to a psuedo random position error. This error affects all GPS units within a particular area and is only "line of sight" in that it affects all units within line of sight of particular satellites, so the area can be huge or indeed global as it was until 2000 when the feature was turned off. Your comment makes it appear that you are confused between jamming and SA. At present GPS is denied in particular areas using other means which are less susceptible to correction. SA could be defeated by the use of dGPS and the US have stated it will never be turned back on again. You seem to have been attempting to claim that GPS cannot be jammed or denied, in this you are wrong. The methods used are not however public knowledge although from time to time NOTAMS and similar publications will indicate in which areas GPS is being denied for trials. Exactly right Steve, Washington DC and Fort Hood in upstate NY are just two places I have personal knowlege of where GPS is munged for security purposes. Regards, JR |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats.electronics,uk.rec.sailing,rec.boats.cruising,sci.geo.satellite-nav
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 20:25:22 -0400, "JR" wrote
(with clarity & insight): Washington DC and Fort Hood in upstate NY are just two places I have personal knowlege of where GPS is munged for security purposes. Regards, JR I've been using plain ol' GPS devices in & around DC for years with no issues. What am I missing? |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats.electronics,uk.rec.sailing,rec.boats.cruising,sci.geo.satellite-nav
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wayne R. wrote:
On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 20:25:22 -0400, "JR" wrote (with clarity & insight): Washington DC and Fort Hood in upstate NY are just two places I have personal knowlege of where GPS is munged for security purposes. Regards, JR I've been using plain ol' GPS devices in & around DC for years with no issues. What am I missing? a) A brain. b) A clue. Not necessarily in that order. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats.electronics,uk.rec.sailing,rec.boats.cruising,sci.geo.satellite-nav
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wayne R." wrote in message ... On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 20:25:22 -0400, "JR" wrote (with clarity & insight): Washington DC and Fort Hood in upstate NY are just two places I have personal knowlege of where GPS is munged for security purposes. Regards, JR I've been using plain ol' GPS devices in & around DC for years with no issues. What am I missing? I have a Ram Mount in my GMC Yukon we use as a travel car, On this mount I place a laptop and more recently a Netbook computer on the Ram and use MS Streets & Trips with a USB "puck" as the GPS receiver/antenna. On the many trips south from Pa to Fla as I use the DC Beltway and with the GPS in tracking mode it becomes "lost". The 1st time this happened I thought it was the unit itself and told it to recalculate the route from my current location. It couldnt determine my current location until we were merging back onto I-95. It simply didn't know where it was. Weather was not a factor (clear skies) nor was it a lack of GPS signal (it still showed as tracking 8 sats). This "problem" is repeatable 100% of the time on various trips thru the area. Similarly, During a trip for my daughters wedding and subsequent trips to Ft Hood, when approching base housing the same thing happens. Every time. When I asked my son-in-law about it he would only say "Yeah, kinda neat huh?" In conversations with my youngest daughters soon-to-be-husband who was home on leave from Jihadistan, he indicated that even there a few sites are so protected. Now, in northern NJ and northern Wi there are coverage gaps where the GPS can't resolve it's location, but these are a different situation as the unit tells me it can't find itself and why. Not so with the DC & Ft. Hood issues. Regards, JR |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats.electronics,uk.rec.sailing,rec.boats.cruising,sci.geo.satellite-nav
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
JR wrote:
Now, in northern NJ and northern Wi there are coverage gaps where the GPS can't resolve it's location, but these are a different situation as the unit tells me it can't find itself and why. Not so with the DC & Ft. Hood issues. Wayne is refusing to admit that jamming occurs, however here's a typical British NOTAM from 06-June-2007: "GPS SIGNAL JAMMING TRIALS. JAMMER LOCATED WITHIN 0.5 [nautical miles] OF 5016N 00516W (PORTREATH, CORNWALL). ACTIVITY MAY AFFECT AIRCRAFT WITHIN 6NM RADIUS FLYING BELOW FL300 [30,000 feet] ... DURING TRIAL PERIODS, GPS RECEIVERS MAY SUFFER INTERMITTENT/TOTAL FAILURE, OR GIVE INCORRECT POSITION INFO ..." Note the last part, it's not just jamming as in drowing out the signal with noise, it's more subtle than that the jamming may involve feeding the GPS incorrect position info. This, in the World According to Wayne, cannot happen and any claim that it does happen is some sort of appeal to irrationality. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats.electronics,uk.rec.sailing,rec.boats.cruising,sci.geo.satellite-nav
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 15:13:57 +0100, (Steve Firth)
wrote: any claim that it does happen is some sort of appeal to irrationality. Steve, with all due respect I think you've got all the claims to irrationality pretty well covered. Cheers. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats.electronics,uk.rec.sailing,rec.boats.cruising,sci.geo.satellite-nav
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wayne.B wrote:
On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 15:13:57 +0100, (Steve Firth) wrote: any claim that it does happen is some sort of appeal to irrationality. Steve, with all due respect I think you've got all the claims to irrationality pretty well covered. yawn Anything to contribute other than vacuous abuse "Wayne"? No, that's obvious. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats.electronics,uk.rec.sailing,rec.boats.cruising,sci.geo.satellite-nav
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 09:56:35 -0400, "JR" wrote
(with clarity & insight): "Wayne R." wrote in message .. . On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 20:25:22 -0400, "JR" wrote (with clarity & insight): Washington DC and Fort Hood in upstate NY are just two places I have personal knowlege of where GPS is munged for security purposes. Regards, JR I've been using plain ol' GPS devices in & around DC for years with no issues. What am I missing? I have a Ram Mount in my GMC Yukon we use as a travel car, On this mount I place a laptop and more recentlya Netbook computer on the Ram and use MS Streets & Trips with a USB "puck" as the GPS receiver/antenna. On the many trips south from Pa to Fla as I use the DC Beltway and with the GPS in tracking mode it becomes "lost". The 1st time this happened I thought it was the unit itself and told it to recalculate the route from my current location. It couldnt determine my current location until we were merging back onto I-95. It simply didn't know where it was. Weather was not a factor (clear skies) nor was it a lack of GPS signal (it still showed as tracking 8 sats). This "problem" is repeatable 100% of the time on various trips thru the area. Similarly, During a trip for my daughters wedding and subsequent trips to Ft Hood, when approching base housing the same thing happens. Every time. When I asked my son-in-law about it he would only say "Yeah, kinda neat huh?" In conversations with my youngest daughters soon-to-be-husband who was home on leave from Jihadistan, he indicated that even there a few sites are so protected. Now, in northern NJ and northern Wi there are coverage gaps where the GPS can't resolve it's location, but these are a different situation as the unit tells me it can't find itself and why. Not so with the DC & Ft. Hood issues. Regards, JR I've found places where I've seen repeatable problems with one type of receiver but not another. (Sometimes problems come & go, and in those circumstances I've attributed it to constellation/reflection variations.) I've spent a lot of time near the White House, Pentagon, Ft. Meade, Langley, etc., in DC without any loss of lock - some of the places that seem most likely to have constant jamming? When your receiver "tells me it can't find itself and why", what does it say? |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats.electronics,uk.rec.sailing,rec.boats.cruising,sci.geo.satellite-nav
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wayne R." wrote in message ... On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 09:56:35 -0400, "JR" wrote (with clarity & insight): "Wayne R." wrote in message . .. On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 20:25:22 -0400, "JR" wrote (with clarity & insight): Washington DC and Fort Hood in upstate NY are just two places I have personal knowlege of where GPS is munged for security purposes. Regards, JR I've been using plain ol' GPS devices in & around DC for years with no issues. What am I missing? I have a Ram Mount in my GMC Yukon we use as a travel car, On this mount I place a laptop and more recentlya Netbook computer on the Ram and use MS Streets & Trips with a USB "puck" as the GPS receiver/antenna. On the many trips south from Pa to Fla as I use the DC Beltway and with the GPS in tracking mode it becomes "lost". The 1st time this happened I thought it was the unit itself and told it to recalculate the route from my current location. It couldnt determine my current location until we were merging back onto I-95. It simply didn't know where it was. Weather was not a factor (clear skies) nor was it a lack of GPS signal (it still showed as tracking 8 sats). This "problem" is repeatable 100% of the time on various trips thru the area. Similarly, During a trip for my daughters wedding and subsequent trips to Ft Hood, when approching base housing the same thing happens. Every time. When I asked my son-in-law about it he would only say "Yeah, kinda neat huh?" In conversations with my youngest daughters soon-to-be-husband who was home on leave from Jihadistan, he indicated that even there a few sites are so protected. Now, in northern NJ and northern Wi there are coverage gaps where the GPS can't resolve it's location, but these are a different situation as the unit tells me it can't find itself and why. Not so with the DC & Ft. Hood issues. Regards, JR I've found places where I've seen repeatable problems with one type of receiver but not another. (Sometimes problems come & go, and in those circumstances I've attributed it to constellation/reflection variations.) I've spent a lot of time near the White House, Pentagon, Ft. Meade, Langley, etc., in DC without any loss of lock - some of the places that seem most likely to have constant jamming? When your receiver "tells me it can't find itself and why", what does it say? Wayne, the receiver will tell me GPS signal not available (usually weather related), or will indicate not enough Sats to resolve position. And it will display how many sats it "sees". With the DC and Ft Hood issues it says nothing. It just doesn't work. Regards, JR |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
May a "landlubber" comment? - was[ Help create better charts] | Cruising | |||
May a "landlubber" comment? - was[ Help create better charts] | Electronics | |||
May a "landlubber" comment? - was[ Help create better charts] | Electronics |