| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Tue, 04 Nov 2003 00:55:02 GMT, "Paul" wrote:
My friend has a Loran unit installed but uses GPS. It's interesting to cruise and compare the two units. The Loran is "not bad" for accuracy but I wouldn't want to rely on it to navigate a channel in the fog. I think he is wise to keep the unit. It's already installed and if for whatever reason he has a failure of his GPS he can still direct assistance to his location. That is what I do. I don't see any reason to get rid of it as long as it works. And, Loran is fine for a foggy channel if you have been there before and added waypoints in the channel. Rodney Myrvaagnes NYC J36 Gjo/a "WooWooism lives" Anon grafitto on the base of the Cuttyhunk breakwater light |
| Reply |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| LORAN here to stay? Maybe. | General | |||
| LORAN here to stay? Maybe. | Cruising | |||
| Loran vs GPS | General | |||
| loran navigation | General | |||
| Question about Loran antenna coupler for Vector II (Pilot II) | Electronics | |||