Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gordon" wrote in message m... Zac's forestay snapped 10 foot above deck. Anyone care to venture why it snapped at that point? This was new rigging and inside a roller furling. Gordon Ha ha ha! Told y'all so. The boy doesn't have a suitable boat and he doesn't know what he's doing. It's very easy to figure out why it broke ten foot above deck. Wind the damned sail up and that's where the clue and sheets end up. Any rocking and rolling of the boat creates a stress point right there. Stainless steel work hardens and crystallizes when bent back and forth. Now, we all know how much Zac motors - he's always relying on his motor and we've heard how rough the seas have been a lot of the time when the wind was down and his was motoring along rolling from gunwale to gunwale. Each and every time the sheets yank on the headstay ten feet up where the clew wraps. I've been telling you people for too many years to count that roll-up sails are unseamanlike. This is just further proof. He was stupid to go to sea with anything other than a selection of 6-8 reliable hank-on headsails for any and all conditions of wind. I hope this helps. Wilbur Hubbard |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Wilbur Hubbard" wrote
It's very easy to figure out why it broke ten foot above deck. Wind the damned sail up and that's where the clue and sheets end up. Any rocking and rolling of the boat creates a stress point right there. Stainless steel work hardens and crystallizes when bent back and forth. This quite a plausible proposition on the face of it. I don't put much tension on my sheets when stowing and this is probably a good reason to continue that practice. I rely on either multiple rolls and/or a sail tie. I've never heard of a headstay failure at this point though. Has anyone else? -- Roger Long |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Roger Long" wrote in message
... troll sh*t removed This quite a plausible proposition on the face of it. I don't put much tension on my sheets when stowing and this is probably a good reason to continue that practice. I rely on either multiple rolls and/or a sail tie. I've never heard of a headstay failure at this point though. Has anyone else? If you've got a furler, then putting a "lot of tension" on the sheets will make it virtually impossible to furl the sail. At least that's my experience. In fact, more than a light hand on one or both sheets makes it extremely difficult. I doubt that was the problem. I don't find it plausable at all. I just looked, and according to the reports the forestay separated at the chainplate at the bow not 10 feet up... not sure where that came from? That was the report Nov. 6th. Also, he's sailing a cutter rig, so no major rigging failure. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think he was talking about retensioning the sheets after everything is
furled. I've seen people do this. With enough tension, there could be pressure of the foils on the stay at the point where the sheets come off the wrap. Thinking about it since, I can't believe it would be an issue on a new rig. -- Roger Long |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Roger Long" wrote in message
... I think he was talking about retensioning the sheets after everything is furled. I've seen people do this. With enough tension, there could be pressure of the foils on the stay at the point where the sheets come off the wrap. Thinking about it since, I can't believe it would be an issue on a new rig. -- Roger Long Perhaps, but it appears to have failed at the chainplate at the bow. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Roger Long" wrote in message
... I think he was talking about retensioning the sheets after everything is furled. I've seen people do this. With enough tension, there could be pressure of the foils on the stay at the point where the sheets come off the wrap. Thinking about it since, I can't believe it would be an issue on a new rig. -- Roger Long FYI... http://www.yachtingmonthly.com//auto...539ymnews.html -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Roger Long" wrote: I think he was talking about retensioning the sheets after everything is furled. I've seen people do this. With enough tension, there could be pressure of the foils on the stay at the point where the sheets come off the wrap. Thinking about it since, I can't believe it would be an issue on a new rig. If the backstay was slacker than it should have been, and the roller furling slide break-point wasn't bolted tightly, the result could cause the furling slide to v-bend at that point. Then, when unfurling/furling often, caused the break to happen. Basically, bad installation. -- Molesworth |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Nigel Molesworth" wrote in message ... In article , "Roger Long" wrote: I think he was talking about retensioning the sheets after everything is furled. I've seen people do this. With enough tension, there could be pressure of the foils on the stay at the point where the sheets come off the wrap. Thinking about it since, I can't believe it would be an issue on a new rig. If the backstay was slacker than it should have been, and the roller furling slide break-point wasn't bolted tightly, the result could cause the furling slide to v-bend at that point. Then, when unfurling/furling often, caused the break to happen. Basically, bad installation. All roll-ups are, by definition, bad installations. Wilbur Hubbard |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 9 Nov 2008 13:10:09 -0800, "Capt. JG"
wrote: ... I just looked, and according to the reports the forestay separated at the chainplate at the bow not 10 feet up... not sure where that came from? That was the report Nov. 6th. Also, he's sailing a cutter rig, so no major rigging failure. The lower terminal is the favorite for failures. Closer to the water. Positioned to trap moisture. All the same, I rerigged a sailboat where the upper stays parted near the masthead, Brian W |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Brian Whatcott" wrote in message
... On Sun, 9 Nov 2008 13:10:09 -0800, "Capt. JG" wrote: ... I just looked, and according to the reports the forestay separated at the chainplate at the bow not 10 feet up... not sure where that came from? That was the report Nov. 6th. Also, he's sailing a cutter rig, so no major rigging failure. The lower terminal is the favorite for failures. Closer to the water. Positioned to trap moisture. All the same, I rerigged a sailboat where the upper stays parted near the masthead, Brian W Seems about right. I guess the early (or distorted) reports were a mid-stay failure. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |