On 2 Nov 2008 18:46:01 -0600, Dave wrote:

On Sat, 01 Nov 2008 08:08:36 -0500, Brian Whatcott
said:

idjits who
don't know that Obama was a professor of Constitutional Law at Chicago
(fer Criss sake!)

....
Obama was never a professor. He was an instructor, but he never wrote
anything of significance....

Google 'Obama professorial posts'. Not all his students raved
about Prof Obama. Perhaps you are unsure of the difference between
an instructor (often a graduate student in the American system), and a
"lecturer", the label for a professor, as titled in e.g the British
system. States with Vo-techs often have academics titled
professor, let alone first tier professional schools.

Brian W

"Brian Whatcott" wrote in message
news
On 2 Nov 2008 18:46:01 -0600, Dave wrote:

On Sat, 01 Nov 2008 08:08:36 -0500, Brian Whatcott
said:

idjits who
don't know that Obama was a professor of Constitutional Law at Chicago
(fer Criss sake!)

...
Obama was never a professor. He was an instructor, but he never wrote
anything of significance....

Google 'Obama professorial posts'. Not all his students raved
about Prof Obama. Perhaps you are unsure of the difference between
an instructor (often a graduate student in the American system), and a
"lecturer", the label for a professor, as titled in e.g the British
system. States with Vo-techs often have academics titled
professor, let alone first tier professional schools.

Brian W

Why Google, just go to the University of Chicago for info:

http://www.law.uchicago.edu/media/index.html

He was a senior lecturer and was invited to a tenure track leading to
professor. U of C says so.

"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 01 Nov 2008 08:08:36 -0500, Brian Whatcott
said:

idjits who
don't know that Obama was a professor of Constitutional Law at Chicago
(fer Criss sake!)

Close, but no cigar.

Obama was never a professor. He was an instructor, but he never wrote
anything of significance, and he never did anything else to warrant his
being made a professor.

Another example of his being a chronic underachiever.


Nope. You're wrong as usual:
UC Law School statement: The Law School has received many media requests
about Barack Obama, especially about his status as "Senior Lecturer." From
1992 until his election to the U.S. Senate in 2004, Barack Obama served as a
professor in the Law School. He was a Lecturer from 1992 to 1996. He was a
Senior Lecturer from 1996 to 2004, during which time he taught three courses
per year. Senior Lecturers are considered to be members of the Law School
faculty and are regarded as professors, although not full-time or
tenure-track. The title of Senior Lecturer is distinct from the title of
Lecturer, which signifies adjunct status. Like Obama, each of the Law
School's Senior Lecturers have high-demand careers in politics or public
service, which prevent full-time teaching. Several times during his 12 years
as a professor in the Law School, Obama was invited to join the faculty in a
full-time tenure-track position, but he declined.


--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Dave" wrote in message
news
On Sun, 2 Nov 2008 17:47:09 -0800, "Capt. JG"
said:

Senior Lecturers are considered to be members of the Law School
faculty and are regarded as professors, although not full-time or
tenure-track.

How many legs does a sheep have if the University of Chicago Law School
calls its tail a leg?


So, you're contradicting the UofC Law School because *you* know better. Got
it.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

Dave,

Note in the U of C article "Senior Lecturer" is capitalized and "professor"
with regard to Obama or the position isn't.

"Professors" have tenure, not all "professors" do.

One is a title, the other is a noun.

On Nov 1, 7:10*am, Keith nuttle wrote:
Paul E. Lehmann wrote:
jgalt wrote:

No doubt they will be playing "Hail to the
Thief" whenever King Obama enters a room.
Throughout his career, such as it is, Obama's
ONLY skill has been taking money from people who
earned it and giving it to people who did NOT
earn it.

That's it.

Hardy har har. *McLame and the Re-puke-licans
re-distribution game is to take money from those
who really do work hard and earn it and give it
to those who don't work hard, don't earn it and
already have plenty of money. The progressive tax
system has been the law of the land for a LONG
time now. *Get over it.

That is Obama's "qualification" for higher
office.

Apart from stealing money, Obama, like all of
his political ilk, will, and take this as a
FACT, steal freedoms from the American people.

Another hardy har har. *You say this after the
Bush administration, with the help of McShame,
instituted spying on US Citizens and declared
anyone who disagree with them as "unpatriotic"
Surely you jest.

Already his strongmen are trying to silence the
press. Newspapers that endorsed McCain have been
punished by being removed from the Obama
campaign plane. Poor old Joe the Plumber, whose
only crime was that he spoke his mind,
IMMEDIATELY became a victim of the Obama attack
machine, which ILLEGALLY used government data
bases to try to discredit poor Joe.

Well, Joe does have other crimes he committed such
as failure to pay his taxes. *And, although not a
crime, he is NOT a licensed plumber and he is a
pathological LIAR. He does not make enough money
to buy the plumbing business he works for and
even if he could, it does not bring in revenue in
excess of $250K. *The dumb **** should know that
if he EVER hopes to afford to buy the business,
Obama's tax plan would put more money in his
pocket to do so.

Look to Hugo Chavez in Venezuela for a preview
of what the Commander and Thief will bring to
America.

Look at Gordon Liddy, an American home grown
terrorist who McShame is pround to call a friend.

If you vote for this monstrosity, you truly
deserve the country that you are going to get.
Mark my words.

Does any one know if obama has been told what his responsibilities would
be under the Constitution? *biden has already shown he does not know
with his comments on Cheney and his participation as the head of the Senate.


Uh, don't you mean Palin? She wants to run the Senate and push through
legislation.

Obama is a Constitutional scholar, so it hardly seems necessary for
someone to tell him what the responsibilities of the Presidency are.

Tom

"Paul E. Lehmann" wrote in
:

The progressive tax
system has been the law of the land for a LONG
time now. Get over it.


I'll bite. What's the Title/Code reference or name of the US LAW that says
I have to pay Income Tax on my wages?

Cite SPECIFIC LAW, not the bogus IRS code.

Go ahead, we'll wait.............(sound of crickets chirping)

There is NO LAW that requires you to pay INCOME TAX, an UNAPPORTIONED,
Unconstitutional tax on labor.

You need to sit and watch Aaron Russo's "America - Freedom to Fascism" for
free on YouTube....all 13 parts of it.

On Sat, 01 Nov 2008 22:17:32 +0000 in
, Larry wrote:

"Paul E. Lehmann" wrote in
:

The progressive tax
system has been the law of the land for a LONG time now. Get over it.


I'll bite. What's the Title/Code reference or name of the US LAW that
says I have to pay Income Tax on my wages?

Cite SPECIFIC LAW, not the bogus IRS code.

Go ahead, we'll wait.............(sound of crickets chirping)

There is NO LAW that requires you to pay INCOME TAX,

Except there is.

Hint: try to sneak a lot of K-Y into jail with you, you'll need it...

--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
Nine out of ten priests who have tried Camels, prefer young boys.

"Mark K. Bilbo" wrote in news:1k2vt5-92i2.ln1
@blaze.blaze.net:

Except there is.

Hint: try to sneak a lot of K-Y into jail with you, you'll need it...

--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
Nine out of ten priests who have tried Camels, prefer young boys.




And not one shred of evidence in a post made by a 12-year-old mind....

QUOTE THE LAW! They are all listed on:

http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/

Hundreds of thousands of Americans DON'T pay income taxes, now, many former
IRS employees. The movie introduces you to a few of their worst offenders.

On Sat, 01 Nov 2008 23:04:45 +0000 in
, Larry wrote:

"Mark K. Bilbo" wrote in news:1k2vt5-92i2.ln1
@blaze.blaze.net:

Except there is.

Hint: try to sneak a lot of K-Y into jail with you, you'll need it...

--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423 EAC Department of Linguistic
Subversion ------------------------------------------------------------
Nine out of ten priests who have tried Camels, prefer young boys.




And not one shred of evidence in a post made by a 12-year-old mind....

QUOTE THE LAW! They are all listed on:

http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/

Hundreds of thousands of Americans DON'T pay income taxes, now, many
former IRS employees. The movie introduces you to a few of their worst
offenders.

The "there is no law" is a scam doofus. And people who fall for the scam
end up in jail.

You want to practice civil disobedience, that's fine with me. I think
more of the US public should grow a set and do so. But civil disobedience
also means going to jail when they catch up with you. It's part of the
package.

You don't like the 16th amendment, lobby to get it repealed. But until
then, it's a quite simple, easily understand part of our primary law. To
wit:

"The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from
whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several states,
and without regard to any census or enumeration."

End of story.

--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
Surgeon General's Warning:
Quitting Religion Now Greatly Increases the Chances of World Peace.