Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to comp.dcom.lans.ethernet,24hoursupport.helpdesk,microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
glen herrmannsfeldt wrote: JohnO wrote: "philo" wrote in message (snip) VGA cable is shielded and CAT5 is not, so you would get some horrible ghosting. BTW, there may still be some ghosting even with VGA cable STP CAT5e or CAT 6 would do the trick, and at these lengths the cost difference isn't an issue. There might be a minimum amount that they will sell, but the real problem isn't shielding but impedance and balanced/unbalanced line. If you transition from a balanced line (UTP) to an unbalanced line (coax), unless exactly impedance matched, it won't work right. UTP cable depends on the voltage and currents on the two wires being exactly opposite to cancel out and not radiate the signal. Coax depends on the voltage on the shield being zero. To couple between them you either need a transformer (if there is no DC component), or active circuitry such as differential amplifiers. VGA has a DC component so you can't use transformers. -- glen You can use a transformer, but wired as a *balun* (coils in series with the lines instead of across them); this provides the required impedance transformation while still passing DC. -- Rich Seifert Networks and Communications Consulting 21885 Bear Creek Way (408) 395-5700 Los Gatos, CA 95033 (408) 228-0803 FAX Send replies to: usenet at richseifert dot com |
#2
![]()
posted to comp.dcom.lans.ethernet,24hoursupport.helpdesk,microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rich Seifert wrote:
(snip) You can use a transformer, but wired as a *balun* (coils in series with the lines instead of across them); this provides the required impedance transformation while still passing DC. So that is how they do it. TV baluns, from 300 ohm balanced to 75 ohm coax, don't do that. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balun Does that restrict which impedance transformation you can make? -- glen |
#3
![]()
posted to comp.dcom.lans.ethernet,24hoursupport.helpdesk,microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
glen herrmannsfeldt wrote: Rich Seifert wrote: (snip) You can use a transformer, but wired as a *balun* (coils in series with the lines instead of across them); this provides the required impedance transformation while still passing DC. So that is how they do it. TV baluns, from 300 ohm balanced to 75 ohm coax, don't do that. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balun Does that restrict which impedance transformation you can make? The impedance transformation is determined by the winding ratio, regardless of whether the coils are in series or parallel with the lines. Putting the balun in series provides better low-frequency response (down to DC), but of course this configuration does not provide any electrical isolation. It functions very much like a common-mode choke, with an impedance change. -- Rich Seifert Networks and Communications Consulting 21885 Bear Creek Way (408) 395-5700 Los Gatos, CA 95033 (408) 228-0803 FAX Send replies to: usenet at richseifert dot com |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|