Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 26, 7:09*am, Larry wrote:
I'm 62. *I don't give a **** how "fit" a 60-year-old is, in his mind....Jack La Lane shouldn't be out sailing alone over 60....maybe over 50! I can not disagree more! I am a liberal Democrate and belive that govenment intrusion is not a good thing. To simply mandate an upper age limitt is simply ignorant. I looked at the "special-better than the rest of us" web page roger created for RBC. Looking at the pics of the authors here Id say youre right. All over 50 ... white ..... and pudgy to dangerously inable and feble. even though Roger claimes to have the back of a 30 year old. I say performance based licensing is the answer. Get an ocupational theropist and a HRM guy to do a task analysist on sailing. Then create a physial/mental agility test. In its most simple terms [eye test, can you run 2 miles in 12 min, do 50 crunches, lift 80 lbs to yor chest 30 times in 3 min. etc. that sorta stuff] Dont pass. Dont go to sea. But to say no sailing after 50 is bull****.... well that is unless you live in select areas of the USA where 50% of the population is OBEASE! Old fat ****s and people without a clue have no business off shore. Keep them on inland and western rivers and let the county/city water cops take care of them Bob |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob wrote:
...Old fat ****s and people without a clue have no business off shore. As far as people without a clue, I tend to agree with you though on the other hand, I think that people have a right to commit suicide any way they choose as long as they don't activate their EPIRB and risk other people's lives in doing so. However, as an old fat ****, myself, I disagree with that part of your statement. My wife and I have made 3 ocean crossings of 20-30 days each as well as numerous shorter passages, logging something like 30,000 nm on our boats. Further, we'll be back out there again as soon as family matters permit. Since we've got hank on sails, we've done our share of sail changes out there on the end of a bouncing bowsprit and all the other tasks the cruising life includes. Cruising is not an aerobic activity. Prior planning, common sense, a knack for fixing things and a willingness to do whatever it takes at times are far more useful than the ability to "run 2 miles in 12 min, do 50 crunches, lift 80 lbs to yor chest 30 times in 3 min. etc". If you don't understand this then I submit that I am probably far safer out there than you are. My days of physical prowess are behind me, but I've still got a lot of years of great cruising ahead of me. It may take me a little longer to get to the top of my mast or to haul my anchor with my manual windless than you, but it's not a race. Hopefully, someday we'll find ourselves in the same anchorage and we can meet face to face and enjoy a sunset and some sushi together. -- Dan Best - (559) 970-9858, Fresno, CA 93704 B-2/75 1977-1979 Tayana 37 #192, "Tricia Jean" http://triciajean192.home.comcast.net |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 10:47:17 -0700, Dan Best
wrote: Hopefully, someday we'll find ourselves in the same anchorage and we can meet face to face and enjoy a sunset and some sushi together. I was with you until you said "sushi." --Vic |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Vic Smith" wrote in message
... On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 10:47:17 -0700, Dan Best wrote: Hopefully, someday we'll find ourselves in the same anchorage and we can meet face to face and enjoy a sunset and some sushi together. I was with you until you said "sushi." --Vic He was trolling... oops.. sorry for the intended pun. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Vic Smith wrote: On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 10:47:17 -0700, Dan Best wrote: Hopefully, someday we'll find ourselves in the same anchorage and we can meet face to face and enjoy a sunset and some sushi together. I was with you until you said "sushi." --Vic I agree too. But, there's nothing wrong with sushi....as long as you cook it right :-) Keith |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I see you use a portabote as a dinghy. What are your thoughts on it?
Thanks Gordon |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gordon wrote:
I see you use a portabote as a dinghy. What are your thoughts on it? Thanks Gordon Gordon, Dinghies are like religion. Everyone's got an opinion and they are all passionate about them. I don't want to start another flame war with everybody defending their favorite, but since you asked, here's a repost of a detailed response I made to someone else on this subject a few months ago. ------ We used to use a 10' Avon inflatable and in fact, still have the Avon, but haven't used it since we got the 12' Porta-Bote in 2001. About a year and a half ago, we completed a 2 year cruise which took us from SF bay area down to Mexico, up into the Sea of Cortez, on down the mainland coast of Mexico, to El Salvador, Costa Rica, Panama, Ecuador, The Galapagos, Polynesia, Tonga, then back up to Hawaii, and finally back to the SF bay area. In all that time, we spent a total of 3 days in a marina in San Diego during final provisioning and another 3 days in a marina in Hawaii, doing some work on the boat before crossing back over to California. The rest of that time, we anchored out. I relate the above just to validate the fact that we relied on our dinghy on a daily basis to get us back and forth from shore, to take excursions on and to dive from for an extended period of time. The Porta-Bote isn't for everybody and it has it's weak points, but on the whole, it works very well for us. "Us" is a husband and wife in our mid-50's. I'm a big guy (6'3" 275 lbs) and my wife is about 5'8 & while I won't say her weight, she's not what anyone would call skinny. I should also note that for a month in Tonga, we also had our son and his girlfriend with us and the 4 of us had no problem using the 12' Porta. Good points: - Ruggedness. We never worry about it rubbing against barnacles or sharp rocks. The worst of that leaves cosmetic scratches, but nothing more. I think everybody with inflatables that we ran into eventually had some kind of problem (seams, valves, punctures, etc.). Porta-Bote users never had to pump up their dinghies in the morning to get them hard. - Easy of use. One person can deploy or restore it, but it's lots faster with 2, so we almost almost always did it together. From stored on deck to in the water with the outboard on and ready to go is maybe 10 minutes without rushing. Noticeably faster than pumping up the Avon. We literally spend almost as much time getting the outboard off the stern rail and onto the Porta as we do assembling the Porta. It's light enough that when recovering it, we tie the bow line to the spinnaker halyard and I hoist it up out of the water and aboard without using a winch while Kathryn guides it into position on the foredeck for disassembly. Launching it after assembling it on the foredeck consists of just dumping it over the side. It also tows nicely. In fair weather, we would rarely bring it up on deck unless we were going to be out overnight. -It stows easily. As you can see in the photo, we stowed ours horizontally on top of the coach roof. Others stowed it along the rail. http://home.comcast.net/~triciajean1...1-05-04-07.JPG -It rows easily and straight. If you've ever rowed an inflatable, you'll know how nice this is. A few owners never use an outboard (most do though). -Faster with the same horsepower. It is much, much faster than our Avon with the same outboard. We started our trip with a 3hp which would plane when there was just one of us aboard. It was giving us some grief (hard to start sometimes), so we replaced it with a 6HP, 4 stroke while we were in Zihuatanejo. It now jumps up onto a fast plane with both of us + groceries, etc. aboard and absolutely flies when there is just one of us. -Capacity. Compared to an inflatable of equivalent length, you can put a lot more grocery bags or other gear into it since you don't have those big, fat tubes taking up so much of your volume. -I never heard of a Porta being stolen. Quite a number of inflatables were. -Cheaper by far. We paid $950 on Ebay for our 12' Porta-Bote with accessories in like new condition. -There are probably more good points, but that's what came to mind. OK, now for what you've been waiting for, the bad points: -Weak seats. They've redesigned them since we got ours and the company says their better, but the ones that came with ours and the other Portas we ran across didn't make it through the first year of continuous use. I don't know if it was the UV exposure or what, but the stainless support pieces would push up through the bottom of the plastic seats. We had some wooden ones made (2 in La Paz and the 3rd in El Salvador) and liked them a whole lot better than those plastic ones. Stronger, look like they are going to last forever and since we painted them white, they're a lot more comfortable to sit on than the black plastic ones after they've been sitting in the tropical sun for awhile. The only down side is that they don't have the built in flotation like the plastic ones did. Before we go out again, I'll have added it to them. -Crappy oars. One plastic blade broke and the fittings rusted badly. We replaced them with these on a trip back up to the States and were very happy with them. http://images.westmarine.com/full/adjoar2004.jpg and http://images.westmarine.com/full/d07944_f.jpg -The black pipe protecting the keel hinge detached in the middle on 2 of the Botes that belonged to others, though it never happened to us. This was not debilitating, just ugly. -Not nearly as much flotation as an inflatable. DUH! If it ever did get swamped, it would be harder to unswamp. Realistically though, the only way you are going to swamp one of these puppies is in the surf (happened to me once - I got thrown sideways and then the next wave rolled me) and where there's one wave breaking, there are lots more behind it. If you swamp any dinghy in the surf, the only way you are going to get it unswamped is to jump out and drag it up out of the surf. As far as size goes, I'd get the largest that you can easily stow up to the 12' model (I understand that the 14' one is substantially heaver than the others). We knew one boat with an 8', a few with the 10' and we had the 12'. The 8' seemed a bit small to me. Fine for 2 people, but it gets crowded quickly when you start adding more. For what it's worth, none of the Porta owners we ran across regretted their decision and wanted to go back to an inflatable. Lots of the inflatable owners were unhappy with their dinghies. Also, whatever you do, don't get a PVC dinghy if you are headed for the tropics. They just don't hold up down there. If you do decide to get an inflatable, get a hypalon one. -- Dan Best - (559) 970-9858, Fresno, CA 93704 B-2/75 1977-1979 Tayana 37 #192, "Tricia Jean" http://triciajean192.home.comcast.net |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
"A Sailor at Sea" A short Publication by Author / Sailor Patrick Michael Sullivan, Nanaimo, BC, Canada | General | |||
Power sailor to wind sailor | Cruising | |||
Why Bobsprit is a lost soul | ASA | |||
Why Bobsprit is a lost soul | ASA |