"Goofball_star_dot_etal" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:24:43 -0600, Geoff Schultz
wrote:


I'm curious. Since you're in the photos, you're not their author/owner.
How are you claiming ownership of them?

-- Geoff
www.GeoffSchultz.org

Good point. I was given one and stole the other. I believe the
photographers would consent to my use. One is a close personal friend
and the other probably
http://www.bbc.co.uk/wales/mid/sites...n_martin.shtml
my Hon. Sec.. I made it clear that they were not for use on Roger's
website. I will delete them from public access.



Too late! I made a copy. LOL

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 20:54:11 -0800, "Capt. JG"
wrote:

"Goofball_star_dot_etal" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:24:43 -0600, Geoff Schultz
wrote:


I'm curious. Since you're in the photos, you're not their author/owner.
How are you claiming ownership of them?

-- Geoff
www.GeoffSchultz.org

Good point. I was given one and stole the other. I believe the
photographers would consent to my use. One is a close personal friend
and the other probably
http://www.bbc.co.uk/wales/mid/sites...n_martin.shtml
my Hon. Sec.. I made it clear that they were not for use on Roger's
website. I will delete them from public access.



Too late! I made a copy. LOL

I can't help noticing that you are LOLing like a lunatic these days..

Gawd it's pathetic to look back in here and see this.

For the record:

I received either an email or a post here, I've forgotten which, from the oh
so well named Goofball saying, "You could use these pictures." and providing
links. Maybe it was someone pretending to be him but I took it at face
value.

I replied asking which person in one of the pictures was him and he replied,
"It's not the little girl."

I didn't include any information other than his posting handle because
that's all he wanted included on the page and, as I saw it, that was
perfectly acceptable.

I never received any other communication from him, specifically a request
for his entry to be removed.

This whole thread just confirms the validity of my decision to move on to
where people actually talk about boats, cruising, and the systems on their
boats without having to wade through piles of crap like this.

--
Roger Long

On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 10:43:00 -0500, "Roger Long"
wrote:

Gawd it's pathetic to look back in here and see this.

For the record:

I received either an email or a post here, I've forgotten which, from the oh
so well named Goofball saying, "You could use these pictures." and providing
links. Maybe it was someone pretending to be him but I took it at face
value.

I replied asking which person in one of the pictures was him and he replied,
"It's not the little girl."

I didn't include any information other than his posting handle because
that's all he wanted included on the page and, as I saw it, that was
perfectly acceptable.

I never received any other communication from him, specifically a request
for his entry to be removed.

This whole thread just confirms the validity of my decision to move on to
where people actually talk about boats, cruising, and the systems on their
boats without having to wade through piles of crap like this.

I have never sent you an email or filled in one of your forms. What
transpired is recorded on Google groups, rec.boats.cruising. I note
you don't have the balls to admit my account is accurate.

"Goofball_star_dot_etal" wrote

I have never sent you an email or filled in one of your forms. What
transpired is recorded on Google groups, rec.boats.cruising. I note
you don't have the balls to admit my account is accurate.


It very well could be accurate given how much subterfuge, pretending, and
header faking there is.

As for the "balls" business, what a tiresome little **** you must be in real
life.

--Roger Long
(exiting in the spirit of what this once great resource and community has
become.)

On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 12:23:51 -0500, "Roger Long"
wrote:

"Goofball_star_dot_etal" wrote

I have never sent you an email or filled in one of your forms. What
transpired is recorded on Google groups, rec.boats.cruising. I note
you don't have the balls to admit my account is accurate.


It very well could be accurate given how much subterfuge, pretending, and
header faking there is.

As for the "balls" business, what a tiresome little **** you must be in real
life.

--Roger Long
(exiting in the spirit of what this once great resource and community has
become.)



Don't let the door hit you where the good lord split you.

On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 12:23:51 -0500, "Roger Long"
wrote:

"Goofball_star_dot_etal" wrote

I have never sent you an email or filled in one of your forms. What
transpired is recorded on Google groups, rec.boats.cruising. I note
you don't have the balls to admit my account is accurate.


It very well could be accurate given how much subterfuge, pretending, and
header faking there is.

As for the "balls" business, what a tiresome little **** you must be in real
life.

--Roger Long
(exiting in the spirit of what this once great resource and community has
become.)




"The work done by accelerating the mass of air downwards is exactly
equal to the work required to keep the aircraft aloft." - Roger Long

"Lift on any foil acting in a fluid (whether air, water, or any other
fluid) is totally depended on VISCOSITY. Without viscosity there can
be NO lift." - Rich H



"How Wings, Sails, Keels, and Rudders Really Work. "
http://forums.sbo.sailboatowners.com

On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 17:54:44 +0000, Goofball_star_dot_etal
wrote:

"The work done by accelerating the mass of air downwards is exactly
equal to the work required to keep the aircraft aloft." - Roger Long

"Lift on any foil acting in a fluid (whether air, water, or any other
fluid) is totally depended on VISCOSITY. Without viscosity there can
be NO lift." - Rich H

"How Wings, Sails, Keels, and Rudders Really Work. "
http://forums.sbo.sailboatowners.com


I suppose that Goofball imagines that Roger Long is contradicted
by Rich H. That is not in fact the case.

On the one hand, Roger is not quite right, because some of the work
done in accelerating air downwards is lost to turbulence (i.e warming
the air mass):
on the other hand Rich H's assertion is much less insightful than it
sounds, because, strangely enough, EVERY fluid has some measure of
viscosity, same as they all have mass. (In fact substituting mass
in place of viscosity makes even more sense!)

In a word....Goofball's contrast reminds me strongly of Wilbur's
strident support for the sulfation spelling, in absolute ignorance of
the existence of the equivalent spelling sulphation. I don't suppose
Goofball is yet another puppet of Wilbur's is he?

BrianW

"Roger Long" wrote in message
...
"Goofball_star_dot_etal" wrote

I have never sent you an email or filled in one of your forms. What
transpired is recorded on Google groups, rec.boats.cruising. I note
you don't have the balls to admit my account is accurate.


It very well could be accurate given how much subterfuge, pretending, and
header faking there is.

As for the "balls" business, what a tiresome little **** you must be in
real life.

--Roger Long
(exiting in the spirit of what this once great resource and community has
become.)

This was my assessment as well, but I didn't want to hurt his feelings.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Roger Long" wrote in message
...
Gawd it's pathetic to look back in here and see this.
snip


Capt. JG wrecked alt.sailing.asa and now he's trying his best to wreck
rec.boats.cruising. It took you guys long enough to start seeing the kind of
person he really is. But, I suppose better late than never.

--
Wilbur Hubbard