Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#41
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Aaron wrote in message . 3.44...
It has been assumed that you wish to do this to make painting (or something similar) easier. If this is the case, how are you going to work on the bottom of the keel? If you have to do the bottom in a different stage anyway, why not use a more conventional method (i.e. moving stands etc.) for the work? The plan is to block of the foot of the keel and secure ropes from the top of the mast out to the . . . plus mast and a moderate keel that is level bottom. All thoughts very much appreciated I have not seen or done or attempted any thing like this before. I dunno but I suspect that many boats are ok being supported only by the weight being on their keels. However, one thing that strikes me is that when the Titanic sank, she was initially in one piece and only broke in half when the upward force of the water was removed from her entire hull when she was submerged. She was designed to be supported evenly all over by the water, once this support was removed, she broke in half. Does this apply?, probably not. |
#42
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
| However, one thing that strikes me
| is that when the Titanic sank, she was initially in one piece and only | broke in half when the upward force of the water was removed from her | entire hull when she was submerged. She was designed to be supported | evenly all over by the water, once this support was removed, she broke | in half. |Does this apply?, probably not. Very likely NOT. This is getting off-topic, but twaddle should be promptly despatched... Have you considered that perhaps Titanic broke in half when colliding with the ocean floor ? |
#43
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
| However, one thing that strikes me
| is that when the Titanic sank, she was initially in one piece and only | broke in half when the upward force of the water was removed from her | entire hull when she was submerged. She was designed to be supported | evenly all over by the water, once this support was removed, she broke | in half. |Does this apply?, probably not. Very likely NOT. This is getting off-topic, but twaddle should be promptly despatched... Have you considered that perhaps Titanic broke in half when colliding with the ocean floor ? |
#44
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 7 Mar 2004 16:40:35 +1000, "Arnold Fringe"
wrote: | However, one thing that strikes me | is that when the Titanic sank, she was initially in one piece and only | broke in half when the upward force of the water was removed from her | entire hull when she was submerged. She was designed to be supported | evenly all over by the water, once this support was removed, she broke | in half. |Does this apply?, probably not. Very likely NOT. This is getting off-topic, but twaddle should be promptly despatched... Have you considered that perhaps Titanic broke in half when colliding with the ocean floor ? talking of twaddle, accident pathologists look to separation of the remnants to help determine the point at which a hull was broken above the sea floor. You could do worse than review the hull separation of the Titanic remnants. Brian W |
#45
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 7 Mar 2004 16:40:35 +1000, "Arnold Fringe"
wrote: | However, one thing that strikes me | is that when the Titanic sank, she was initially in one piece and only | broke in half when the upward force of the water was removed from her | entire hull when she was submerged. She was designed to be supported | evenly all over by the water, once this support was removed, she broke | in half. |Does this apply?, probably not. Very likely NOT. This is getting off-topic, but twaddle should be promptly despatched... Have you considered that perhaps Titanic broke in half when colliding with the ocean floor ? talking of twaddle, accident pathologists look to separation of the remnants to help determine the point at which a hull was broken above the sea floor. You could do worse than review the hull separation of the Titanic remnants. Brian W |
#46
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have done the osmosis using long wooden wedges under the rubbing strake,
seemed very safe i will look for photos! "beryl george" wrote in message ... From other members of the news group thoughts and experience am I missing something or is this something that can be carried out providing there is care with a reasonable degree of ease and safety. The plan is to block of the foot of the keel and secure ropes from the top of the mast out to the sides at about 45 degrees to hold the boat upright so the support pads on the wintering cradle can be lowered to allow unhindered access to apply the 4 plus coats of epoxy coating to the under sides. Or has anyone any other suggestions of a better way to support the boat whilst it is epoxied. The boat weight is around 10 ton with a 50 foot plus mast and a moderate keel that is level bottom. All thoughts very much appreciated I have not seen or done or attempted any thing like this before. |
#47
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have done the osmosis using long wooden wedges under the rubbing strake,
seemed very safe i will look for photos! "beryl george" wrote in message ... From other members of the news group thoughts and experience am I missing something or is this something that can be carried out providing there is care with a reasonable degree of ease and safety. The plan is to block of the foot of the keel and secure ropes from the top of the mast out to the sides at about 45 degrees to hold the boat upright so the support pads on the wintering cradle can be lowered to allow unhindered access to apply the 4 plus coats of epoxy coating to the under sides. Or has anyone any other suggestions of a better way to support the boat whilst it is epoxied. The boat weight is around 10 ton with a 50 foot plus mast and a moderate keel that is level bottom. All thoughts very much appreciated I have not seen or done or attempted any thing like this before. |
#48
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
You may want to have multiple sets of ropes, one set at the top and one
set at the spreaders, kind of like the way radio towers are supported at multiple levels. Or like how a mast is secured to a boat? |
#49
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004 10:22:59 -0000, "PsiMan"
wrote: You may want to have multiple sets of ropes, one set at the top and one set at the spreaders, kind of like the way radio towers are supported at multiple levels. Or like how a mast is secured to a boat? Exactly. The point would be to have a set of ropes everywhere shrouds attach to the mast and tension then the same. That kind of arrangement should be easily be strong enough to keep the boat upright. Steve |
#50
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steven Shelikoff wrote:
"PsiMan" wrote: Or like how a mast is secured to a boat? Exactly. The point would be to have a set of ropes everywhere shrouds attach to the mast and tension then the same. That kind of arrangement should be easily be strong enough to keep the boat upright. I seem to recall that the original poster intended to secure these ropes to other peoples' cradles. Would that color your opinion? -- Good luck and good sailing. s/v Kerry Deare of Barnegat http://kerrydeare.home.comcast.net/ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Looked today ( Boat Choices) | Cruising | |||
Boat fell off trailer | General | |||
offshore fishing | General | |||
1st boat help | General | |||
Dealing with a boat fire, checking for a common cause | General |