Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 21:08:52 +0000, Larry wrote:
Geoff Schultz wrote in 6: So your argument is that CFCs such as R-12 don't interact with the ozone layer and hasten its demise? I would say that there's a lot of well established science that would argue with you. America has gotten rid of R-12 for many many years. The ozone hole is bigger. I'm not saying that R-12 isn't a terrible chemical capable of destroying ozone in the laboratory, where, of course at great expense, all these facts fester. What I'm OBSERVING is that the effect of dragging America, at 10 to 15 times the price, into R-134a has been....well......ZERO, just like most other programs designed to separate the American consumer from his wealth by the corporate government bureaucrats. The size of the ozone hole hasn't done what we were told it would do BECAUSE the 6.2oz of R-12 in my 1973 Mercedes 220D's air conditioner caused it. It didn't. Treat yourself: http://press.princeton.edu/TOCs/c6767.html |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
How many amps to start this unit? | Cruising | |||
How many amps to start this unit? | Electronics | |||
Circuit Breaker Trip Amps | Electronics | |||
Amps draw per horsepower | Electronics | |||
Amps drawn per H.P. | Electronics |