Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
February 17th - The key to success in sailing - Part One
Well, sailing successfully to a key, anyway. As I write, we're anchored off Rodriguez Key south of Miami. No doubt, those of you who've commented on my logs before have noticed I've not been saying much lately. The "why" of that is another story altogether, but it suffices to say that our last many weeks have been varied and different in many ways from our first several months afloat. Before I get into the sailboat stuff, for those who may have been concerned, we've been attending to a lot of personal (as compared to cruising) business. Among them is the expiration of our Cobra coverage under Lydia's prior employment insurance extension. Those of you on Lydia's log got a flavor of that in her last posting. That expiration led us to try to squeeze all the last-minute stuff we could into our policy. So, we came to Miami, where we not only managed the final refill on our medications on the day before our expiration, we got a final colonoscopy and my light-vision test as the final item needed for my medicals to qualify for my USCG commercial license for me, and a mammogram and a nasal resection for Lydia. Lydia's mammogram was a very distinct departure from every prior one she's ever had, as it was done with one of the new digital machines. We men have no concept of what women suffer in mammograms, but the new machines not only don't do the suffering, it's over in a flash. Her nasal resection was over quickly, too, but despite the marvelous "stuff" (flower children may use a different, more scatological, euphemism.) she was provided, she strenuously objected to the pain in her nose for a day until the packing was removed from her nostrils. She's been breathing freely, ever since. She even noted to a friend that, as a result of her having to sleep on one side for all her life, she has wrinkles on one side of her face which aren't present on the other. She's making up for lost time, sleeping nearly universally on the other side, now, so, while she'll tell you it (the pain, compared to the gain) wasn't worth it, for the rest of her life she'll be able to breathe easy, so to speak. Already, she doesn't need nearly as much sleep as she did, the sleep interruption resulting from her obstructed nasal passage having caused frequent apnea-like symptoms being what caused me to finally put my foot down and demand she see an ENT. All of our medical stuff in Miami, including my vision test, was as a result of a connection forged with the cruising community. That doctor - who was also an FAA examiner, and thus gave me my light test (the means to confirm that I wasn't a danger on the water!) - was instantly able to refer us to some of the very best in the medical community in Miami. Now that that's over, however, we went sailing. I'll come back to the immediate past, but first... We sailed down to Miami from Lake Worth - but only after making the inside passage from there to Ft. Lauderdale, including the 21 opening bridges. It took two days to get there, with an overnight stop in "Lake Boca Raton" - a puddle off to the side in the Intra-Coastal Waterway - where we were, again, able to get a very nice internet connection. Once we reached Port Everglades, the Fort Lauderdale commercial port, we headed south in lousy conditions, but made it to Miami without incident. We even threaded the needle in extremely shallow water, getting to our St. Steven's mooring off the Miami Yacht Club without grounding. Getting on that mooring was a bit exciting in the wind, however, and we fouled our prop with the mooring. Into the water with my hookah rig (a compressor on the deck, with a long line providing air below) and wetsuit, I got it untangled with only the loss of one tool but no other real excitements, and we hooked on for the night. Side trips excepted, we've been there ever since. In the meantime, however, since St. Steven wanted a car at the yacht club so he could use it when he flew into the area, we rented a car, made a dash back to St. Simons, drove both cars down, and his car, too, has been at our disposal for our entire time here. Mucho gracias, multi bene, merci beaucoup and every other form of thanks you could imagine. We'd not be able to have done it without your generosity. Before we got into our medical stuff, Saints Steven and Michael, along with their wives, came for a visit, which is related to the title of this log. We'd hoped to sail to where we are, now... The weather gods, however, had gotten the schedule confused. It was nasty enough that their arrival was delayed by a day, and once here, the day we could leave had the wind briskly coming from the south, which is great for a Gulf Stream Crossing, but not much for getting down the island chain inshore. It's been quite a while since I did this particular passage, the last time being when we took possession and delivered the boat. As a result, I'd forgotten the fine details, and when I looked at the overview of the chart, it appeared that there was ample room to tack down the channel, and, even though it would take a long time, it was ok. They'd come to sail, and that would be sailing, wouldn't it? So, it would be all right. That it was at night was of little moment, as it would mean that we'd arrive at daylight, allowing for more snorkeling time, and allow a night passage experience as well. However, not only did our tacking give us next to no forward progress (in the total scheme of things), as we approached the Fowey Rocks weather station, and continued to look at the detail of the route, it was apparent that Hawk Channel was the only safe way to navigate the last portion of the trip. To go outside of the reefs would mean bucking the Gulf Stream's current; it's possible that we'd make no actual forward progress at all. Unfortunately, Hawk Channel is very narrow, so tacking was out of the question, and, worse, has day marks only to show where we should be staying, even if we were to "drive" (motor vs. sail) it. That meant that we'd not be able to navigate it in the dark. So, at about midnight, after deciding to let the second watch sleep in for many hours past our expected changeover, Steve and I, the first watch, made the executive decision to head back the other way, taking advantage of the prevailing wind of the time, and of the expected wind shift to the other direction allowing us to come back the following day. Sure enough, we dashed north, and arrived off Miami in short order. Given that they'd come to sail, the destination wasn't as important as the experience, and since the wind was scheduled to come around the other way on the following day, it would make for a nice return, as well. So, off we went, expecting to go into Ft. Lauderdale for a leisurely rest before returning. As the sailing was so good, we kept on going, and woke the next shift when we were about 5 miles north of Miami's Government Cut, at about 4AM. Lydia, Mike, Vicki and Dianne took over as the wind built on a perfect broad reach. However, they all were gossiping so much that they entirely missed Ft. Lauderdale as it went by, and by daylight, were nearly to Lake Worth. When they realized their mistake, they attempted a reversal, only to foul both sails. The ensuing noise woke both me and Steve, and we were all on deck for the bash into the building wind to get us back to Ft. Lauderdale. We managed to tack our way back in, keeping close to shore to minimize the waves and try to take advantage of any counter-current off the Gulf Stream. Once into Ft. Lauderdale's Port Everglades, we headed down the ICW to an area Steve and Mike knew, pulled up to a restaurant to have a late lunch, and assessed where we might spend the night. Flying Pig is substantially deeper than either of their boats, so finding an anchorage was going to be challenging. Neither of the marinas in the area responded to either VHF radio hails or cell phone calls, so Steve and Mike set out on foot to reach the marina on the same side as the restaurant. There, they encountered one of our newest, charming, unique friends - Ricki, a big-boat Captain living on her own massive trawler/cruiser there in the marina. She told them we should come on in and it would either be free or a trivial amount to stay. Nobody's home most of the time, there, due to its being under renovation, and being a weekend, it was no problem. Hot showers and laundry ensued, and, the weather being what it was, we stayed another day, as to go south in the rain which was building, along with the strong winds, wasn't appealing. However, Steve and Mike needed to be back in the air, and, fortunately, Mike's plane wasn't far away, since they landed at a corporate airport nearby in Ft. Lauderdale when they came down (see Steve's car at the marina for reference). We inquired about calling a cab, and Ricki insisted, instead, on taking them there. So, as they headed off to their airport, because the weather was forecast to be building, and even worse than it was at the moment, we shipped out as well. With a strong following wind and seas, we rolled around and crash jibed several times, breaking, first, the shackle on the deck side of the preventer (the line from the end of the boom, led forward, supposed to prevent the boom from flopping the other way if the wind shifts), and then, on the boom attachment point. So, we put in the sails and motor-sailed on bare poles, making over 8 knots at times. With all the rolling which happened without any sails to steady us, I took advantage of the cleaning action to run the fuel polisher. As our vacuum guage has stayed at the same level as a new filter, I'm convinced that we got as much as will likely, or even possibly, be dislodged, from the walls and floor of the tank as a result of our wreck and trip back to the yard afterward last year at about this time. None the less, it makes me feel secure to think that our Racor filters get only the best, cleanest fuel, and any future filter changes will be presumptive rather than fouled! As my dear friend George says, this is reaching 4 pages, so the rest of the story will have to wait for another time. We arrived in Miami none the worse for wear, got ourselves back on the mooring ball, and set about our medical chores. I'll tell you more about the keys and Ft. Lauderdale in the next installment. L8R Skip Morgan 461 #2 SV Flying Pig KI4MPC See our galleries at www.justpickone.org/skip/gallery ! Follow us at http://groups.google.com/group/flyingpiglog and/or http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TheFlyingPigLog "You are never given a wish without also being given the power to make it come true. You may have to work for it however." (and) "There is no such thing as a problem without a gift for you in its hands. You seek problems because you need their gifts." (Richard Bach, in The Reluctant Messiah) |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Skip Gundlach" wrote in message ... Unfortunately, Hawk Channel is very narrow, so tacking was out of the question, and, worse, has day marks only to show where we should be staying, even if we were to "drive" (motor vs. sail) it. That meant that we'd not be able to navigate it in the dark. Hawk Channel is anything but narrow. You obviously weren't even IN Hawk Channel if you make such a stupid claim. For everybody's information, Hawk Channel is anything from three to five miles wide the entire way from Miami to Key West with the exception of a small choke point of a couple of miles in and around Fowey Rocks light. It consists of the area between the outlying barrier reef and the Keys. Plenty of water there to tack to one's heart's desire. Skippy is a liar! Obviously makes up more sailing tales than he actually lives. And, for your further edification, the Gulf Stream current rarely comes to within three to five miles of the barrier reef. And, in most places, the reef itself is no barrier to a sailboat that draws five feet or so. One can tack his way across the reef back and forth in most places. In many places the reef is ten to twelve feet beneath the surface at MLW. It's a hazard to shipping but to small sailing yachts it's not much of a problem. Time to get real Skippy. Your lies about the Florida Keys will be exposed by yours truly because, like many places up and down the East Coast and the Gulf Coast and the Florida Keys and the entire Bahamas chain, I've spent years being there doing that. Wilbur Hubbard |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 20, 6:42 pm, "Wilbur Hubbard"
wrote: "Skip Gundlach" wrote in message ... Unfortunately, Hawk Channel is very narrow, so tacking was out of the question, and, worse, has day marks only to show where we should be staying, even if we were to "drive" (motor vs. sail) it. That meant that we'd not be able to navigate it in the dark. Hawk Channel is anything but narrow. You obviously weren't even IN Hawk Channel if you make such a stupid claim. For everybody's information, Hawk Channel is anything from three to five miles wide the entire way from Miami to Key West with the exception of a small choke point of a couple of miles in and around Fowey Rocks light. It consists of the area between the outlying barrier reef and the Keys. Plenty of water there to tack to one's heart's desire. Skippy is a liar! Obviously makes up more sailing tales than he actually lives. And, for your further edification, the Gulf Stream current rarely comes to within three to five miles of the barrier reef. And, in most places, the reef itself is no barrier to a sailboat that draws five feet or so. One can tack his way across the reef back and forth in most places. In many places the reef is ten to twelve feet beneath the surface at MLW. It's a hazard to shipping but to small sailing yachts it's not much of a problem. Time to get real Skippy. Your lies about the Florida Keys will be exposed by yours truly because, like many places up and down the East Coast and the Gulf Coast and the Florida Keys and the entire Bahamas chain, I've spent years being there doing that. Wilbur Hubbard You've obviously not been paying attention to my prior posts. Our yacht draws well over 6 feet, and the destination we were attempting was just beyond Fowey Rocks. The combination caused us to make an easier landfall and sailing destination. As the later portion of my post indicates, we did indeed transit that area later, with great results. As before, I invite you to tell us of where you've cruised in the last - say - year... We're out doing it... L8R Skip Morgan 461 #2 SV Flying Pig KI4MPC See our galleries at www.justpickone.org/skip/gallery ! Follow us at http://groups.google.com/group/flyingpiglog and/or http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TheFlyingPigLog "You are never given a wish without also being given the power to make it come true. You may have to work for it however." (and) "There is no such thing as a problem without a gift for you in its hands. You seek problems because you need their gifts." (Richard Bach, in The Reluctant Messiah) |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 20:30:11 -0800 (PST), Skip Gundlach
wrote: On Feb 20, 6:42 pm, "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote: "Skip Gundlach" wrote in message ... Unfortunately, Hawk Channel is very narrow, so tacking was out of the question, and, worse, has day marks only to show where we should be staying, even if we were to "drive" (motor vs. sail) it. That meant that we'd not be able to navigate it in the dark. Hawk Channel is anything but narrow. You obviously weren't even IN Hawk Channel if you make such a stupid claim. For everybody's information, Hawk Channel is anything from three to five miles wide the entire way from Miami to Key West with the exception of a small choke point of a couple of miles in and around Fowey Rocks light. It consists of the area between the outlying barrier reef and the Keys. Plenty of water there to tack to one's heart's desire. Skippy is a liar! Obviously makes up more sailing tales than he actually lives. And, for your further edification, the Gulf Stream current rarely comes to within three to five miles of the barrier reef. And, in most places, the reef itself is no barrier to a sailboat that draws five feet or so. One can tack his way across the reef back and forth in most places. In many places the reef is ten to twelve feet beneath the surface at MLW. It's a hazard to shipping but to small sailing yachts it's not much of a problem. Time to get real Skippy. Your lies about the Florida Keys will be exposed by yours truly because, like many places up and down the East Coast and the Gulf Coast and the Florida Keys and the entire Bahamas chain, I've spent years being there doing that. Wilbur Hubbard You've obviously not been paying attention to my prior posts. Our yacht draws well over 6 feet, and the destination we were attempting was just beyond Fowey Rocks. The combination caused us to make an easier landfall and sailing destination. As the later portion of my post indicates, we did indeed transit that area later, with great results. As before, I invite you to tell us of where you've cruised in the last - say - year... We're out doing it... L8R Skip Morgan 461 #2 SV Flying Pig KI4MPC See our galleries at www.justpickone.org/skip/gallery ! Follow us at http://groups.google.com/group/flyingpiglog and/or http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TheFlyingPigLog "You are never given a wish without also being given the power to make it come true. You may have to work for it however." (and) "There is no such thing as a problem without a gift for you in its hands. You seek problems because you need their gifts." (Richard Bach, in The Reluctant Messiah) Ah Skip, don't pay poor old Willie-boy no mind. He just sits there in his Lazy-boy recliner, down there at the trailer park, reading his books and magazines and imagining he is sailing the Spanish Main. He rides a bicycle to work, don't even have a car, never mind a boat -- except for the rubber duck there in the bathtub. Bruce-in-Bangkok (Note:remove underscores from address for reply) |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bruce in Bangkok" wrote in message ... On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 20:30:11 -0800 (PST), Skip Gundlach wrote: On Feb 20, 6:42 pm, "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote: "Skip Gundlach" wrote in message ... Unfortunately, Hawk Channel is very narrow, so tacking was out of the question, and, worse, has day marks only to show where we should be staying, even if we were to "drive" (motor vs. sail) it. That meant that we'd not be able to navigate it in the dark. Hawk Channel is anything but narrow. You obviously weren't even IN Hawk Channel if you make such a stupid claim. For everybody's information, Hawk Channel is anything from three to five miles wide the entire way from Miami to Key West with the exception of a small choke point of a couple of miles in and around Fowey Rocks light. It consists of the area between the outlying barrier reef and the Keys. Plenty of water there to tack to one's heart's desire. Skippy is a liar! Obviously makes up more sailing tales than he actually lives. And, for your further edification, the Gulf Stream current rarely comes to within three to five miles of the barrier reef. And, in most places, the reef itself is no barrier to a sailboat that draws five feet or so. One can tack his way across the reef back and forth in most places. In many places the reef is ten to twelve feet beneath the surface at MLW. It's a hazard to shipping but to small sailing yachts it's not much of a problem. Time to get real Skippy. Your lies about the Florida Keys will be exposed by yours truly because, like many places up and down the East Coast and the Gulf Coast and the Florida Keys and the entire Bahamas chain, I've spent years being there doing that. Wilbur Hubbard You've obviously not been paying attention to my prior posts. Our yacht draws well over 6 feet, and the destination we were attempting was just beyond Fowey Rocks. The combination caused us to make an easier landfall and sailing destination. As the later portion of my post indicates, we did indeed transit that area later, with great results. As before, I invite you to tell us of where you've cruised in the last - say - year... We're out doing it... L8R Skip Morgan 461 #2 SV Flying Pig KI4MPC See our galleries at www.justpickone.org/skip/gallery ! Follow us at http://groups.google.com/group/flyingpiglog and/or http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TheFlyingPigLog "You are never given a wish without also being given the power to make it come true. You may have to work for it however." (and) "There is no such thing as a problem without a gift for you in its hands. You seek problems because you need their gifts." (Richard Bach, in The Reluctant Messiah) Ah Skip, don't pay poor old Willie-boy no mind. He just sits there in his Lazy-boy recliner, down there at the trailer park, reading his books and magazines and imagining he is sailing the Spanish Main. He rides a bicycle to work, don't even have a car, never mind a boat -- except for the rubber duck there in the bathtub. Bruce-in-Bangkok (Note:remove underscores from address for reply) ======================== In my opinion, Wibur makes some valid points.. he certainly seems to know the channel he posted about. As for Skips "As before, I invite you to tell us of where you've cruised in the last - say - year...We're out doing it..." Skip is living part time on a boat, to call what he has been doing "cruising" is a very big stretch. Since his ill-fated launch, ship wreck, repair, rebuild, depression, .. blah blah .. about all the cruising he has done is along the coast, and even this was short hops with long anchor hanging time in between. It is February, very cold where I live, snow up the *&^%. If I was "living" on my boat, "living" the cruising lifestyle as many do .. I would be in the island, Bahama's, Cuba.. who knows ... but I would not be sitting at some "good guy let me use it" dock in FLA. That isn't cruising, that is houseboat time. I enjoy Skips postings, in a weird way they are like a bad tv show with a predictable plot, but I keep watching anyway. He speaks of his life, health, relatives, etc... very enjoyable. But .. not in any way, or stretch of the imagination is what he has been doing ... CRUISING. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Sir Thomas of Cannondale" wrote in
news:CAevj.20178$eg3.7989@trndny05: "Bruce in Bangkok" wrote in message ... On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 20:30:11 -0800 (PST), Skip Gundlach wrote: On Feb 20, 6:42 pm, "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote: "Skip Gundlach" wrote in message news:4ef13d3f-d5d1-4e60-ad28-6a00e27b8e08 @p73g2000hsd.googlegroups.c om... Unfortunately, Hawk Channel is very narrow, so tacking was out of the question, and, worse, has day marks only to show where we should be staying, even if we were to "drive" (motor vs. sail) it. That meant that we'd not be able to navigate it in the dark. Hawk Channel is anything but narrow. You obviously weren't even IN Hawk Channel if you make such a stupid claim. For everybody's information, Hawk Channel is anything from three to five miles wide the entire way from Miami to Key West with the exception of a small choke point of a couple of miles in and around Fowey Rocks light. It consists of the area between the outlying barrier reef and the Keys. Plenty of water there to tack to one's heart's desire. Skippy is a liar! Obviously makes up more sailing tales than he actually lives. And, for your further edification, the Gulf Stream current rarely comes to within three to five miles of the barrier reef. And, in most places, the reef itself is no barrier to a sailboat that draws five feet or so. One can tack his way across the reef back and forth in most places. In many places the reef is ten to twelve feet beneath the surface at MLW. It's a hazard to shipping but to small sailing yachts it's not much of a problem. Time to get real Skippy. Your lies about the Florida Keys will be exposed by yours truly because, like many places up and down the East Coast and the Gulf Coast and the Florida Keys and the entire Bahamas chain, I've spent years being there doing that. Wilbur Hubbard You've obviously not been paying attention to my prior posts. Our yacht draws well over 6 feet, and the destination we were attempting was just beyond Fowey Rocks. The combination caused us to make an easier landfall and sailing destination. As the later portion of my post indicates, we did indeed transit that area later, with great results. As before, I invite you to tell us of where you've cruised in the last - say - year... We're out doing it... L8R Skip Morgan 461 #2 SV Flying Pig KI4MPC See our galleries at www.justpickone.org/skip/gallery ! Follow us at http://groups.google.com/group/flyingpiglog and/or http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TheFlyingPigLog "You are never given a wish without also being given the power to make it come true. You may have to work for it however." (and) "There is no such thing as a problem without a gift for you in its hands. You seek problems because you need their gifts." (Richard Bach, in The Reluctant Messiah) Ah Skip, don't pay poor old Willie-boy no mind. He just sits there in his Lazy-boy recliner, down there at the trailer park, reading his books and magazines and imagining he is sailing the Spanish Main. He rides a bicycle to work, don't even have a car, never mind a boat -- except for the rubber duck there in the bathtub. Bruce-in-Bangkok (Note:remove underscores from address for reply) ======================== In my opinion, Wibur makes some valid points.. he certainly seems to know the channel he posted about. As for Skips "As before, I invite you to tell us of where you've cruised in the last - say - year...We're out doing it..." Skip is living part time on a boat, to call what he has been doing "cruising" is a very big stretch. Since his ill-fated launch, ship wreck, repair, rebuild, depression, .. blah blah .. about all the cruising he has done is along the coast, and even this was short hops with long anchor hanging time in between. It is February, very cold where I live, snow up the *&^%. If I was "living" on my boat, "living" the cruising lifestyle as many do .. I would be in the island, Bahama's, Cuba.. who knows ... but I would not be sitting at some "good guy let me use it" dock in FLA. That isn't cruising, that is houseboat time. I enjoy Skips postings, in a weird way they are like a bad tv show with a predictable plot, but I keep watching anyway. He speaks of his life, health, relatives, etc... very enjoyable. But .. not in any way, or stretch of the imagination is what he has been doing ... CRUISING. The key thing to remember is that the vast majority of the people who respond in this group have never cruised. Most of the people have sailed at some time in their lives and have owned, or own, sailboats. You also have the people who race, but that has virtually nothing do to with cruising. But as far as doing anything more than long vacations on their boats, they've never sailed more than a few hundred miles from their home port. Oh, excuse me, they've also chartered in the BVIs or somewhere similiar. The fact of the matter is that most cruisers move from port to port, or anchorage to anchorage, in much the same manner that people move their RVs between RV parks. There's nothing the matter with this, other than it doesn't fit the image that some of you have of a "real" cruiser. It's also interesting that many of you think that you can only cruise on a sailboat. I know lots of people who cruise on their trawlers and we are often jealous of their space and comfort. Simply because they're not cruising using wind power, doesn't mean that they're not cruising. Look at the title of this group: reg.boats.cruising. Do you notice that it's not rec.sailing.cruising? Maybe you should take a hint from that. It seems like some of you think that if you're cruising, that you need to be constantly moving the boat. I've done that, and found that I've missed a lot along the way. You need to stop and get to know an area to truly experience a culture. I much prefer to find an area that I like and hang around for an extended period of time. We found that we really liked the NW Caribbean (Belize, Guatemala & Honduras) and spent 4 seasons exploring the area and giving me my diving fixes. I had absolutely no problem spending the majority of a season anchored at Lighthouse Reef in Belize diving 2 times a day. Some of you might not call that cruising, but it makes me happy. You'll also note that you rarely see posts from the standard contributors about their cruising. Most of them post year round from the comfort of their homes and spend most of their time bashing others. Skip certainly has had his fair share of problems, many of them self generated, but he is out there learning and doing it. I wish him well and hope that the reality lives up to the dream. So until you start posting from your boat that you're moving from port to port, don't you dare claim that Skip isn't cruising. -- Geoff www.GeoffSchultz.org |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Sir Thomas of Cannondale" wrote in message news:CAevj.20178$eg3.7989@trndny05... In my opinion, Wibur makes some valid points.. he certainly seems to know the channel he posted about. Thank you, sir! Wilbur always knows of which he speaks. Some folks even consider me prescient. But a lot of that is due to a logical mind that easily discerns cause and effect. Face it, it hardly takes a genius to realize that the likes of Joe and Skippy are heading for a fall. One can tell they are possessed of little or no logic or common sense. As for Skips "As before, I invite you to tell us of where you've cruised in the last - say - year...We're out doing it..." Like motoring up and down the ICW and going aground every other day is cruising . . . Skip is living part time on a boat, to call what he has been doing "cruising" is a very big stretch. Exactly correct, my good man! Since his ill-fated launch, ship wreck, repair, rebuild, depression, .. blah blah .. about all the cruising he has done is along the coast, and even this was short hops with long anchor hanging time in between. And the fool can't even anchor without dragging most every time the wind blows or the current changes. It is February, very cold where I live, snow up the *&^%. If I was "living" on my boat, "living" the cruising lifestyle as many do .. I would be in the island, Bahama's, Cuba.. who knows ... but I would not be sitting at some "good guy let me use it" dock in FLA. That isn't cruising, that is houseboat time. Perfect for Skippy as he obviously has a houseboat mentality. All the systems that are constantly breaking down have little to do with sailing but, rather, with turning a sailboat into a houseboat. I enjoy Skips postings, in a weird way they are like a bad tv show with a predictable plot, but I keep watching anyway. He speaks of his life, health, relatives, etc... very enjoyable. But .. not in any way, or stretch of the imagination is what he has been doing ... CRUISING. Right on, brother! Wilbur Hubbard |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:59:14 GMT, "Sir Thomas of Cannondale"
wrote: He speaks of his life, health, relatives, etc... very enjoyable. But .. not in any way, or stretch of the imagination is what he has been doing ... CRUISING. I beg to differ: Your life, health and relatives do not go away just because you are spending a lot of time on a boat and traveling around. He's doing a lot more cruising than most people on this group, and seems to be enjoying the challenges and telling us about it. Nothing wrong with that, and a careful read can be educational. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|