![]() |
Looked today ( Boat Choices)
In her original post she said it was the Cheoy Lee that had the teak
decks, not the Tayana. "Cheoy Lee Pedrick 36, 1985 Model: This boat is simply a very good looking boat; it has loads of visual appeal and has been well-kept. The teak deck is in quite good condition, as are the topside fittings and rigging." Did they build them the same way? I don't know. Eric Rich Hampel wrote in message ... The underlayment of teak decks on Tayanas is built up of softwood squares individually isolated by dams of polyester. If such underlayment does get wet it usually doesnt not spread accross the whole deck as would be the case with ''sheets' of core filler. Not that you cant get a soggy deck on a Tayana; but, if you do the damage wont be as catastrophic as would a deck with continuous underlayment filler. Teak deck maintenance isnt all that bad if you kkep up a gentle and consistent regime of maintenance. Hell, I bet you expend more time scrubbing a glass deck than a teak deck owner does in periodically looking for loose bungs. Give me a teak deck anytime. So what if it makes the boat a bit more top heavy, **nothing** is this world has the non-dkid ability of bare teak. |
Boat Choices... teak decks
"DSK" wrote in message .. . In short, I own a boat with a teak deck... they're beautiful but they are not practical in any way... the maintenance is awful, the surface is unreliable, and if it's screwed down over cored fiberglass it's a lurking rot instigator. Our teak deck is coming off in the near future, to be replaced by either plain fiberglass with painted non-skid, or perhaps those industrial textured non-skid materials. A friend of mine has a Choy Lee that had the deck problem and he removed the teak and replaced it with Treadmaster. I have it on my boat, which I love, but it is awful on bare feet. Leanne s/v Fundy |
Boat Choices... teak decks
"DSK" wrote in message .. . In short, I own a boat with a teak deck... they're beautiful but they are not practical in any way... the maintenance is awful, the surface is unreliable, and if it's screwed down over cored fiberglass it's a lurking rot instigator. Our teak deck is coming off in the near future, to be replaced by either plain fiberglass with painted non-skid, or perhaps those industrial textured non-skid materials. A friend of mine has a Choy Lee that had the deck problem and he removed the teak and replaced it with Treadmaster. I have it on my boat, which I love, but it is awful on bare feet. Leanne s/v Fundy |
Looked today ( Boat Choices)
eric, if you don't know what a Tayana 37 is, don't comment. contribute or
lurk. your only other choice is to open your mouth and be flamed. now, eric, go try to find out what a Tayana 37 is. In her original post she said it was the Cheoy Lee that had the teak decks, not the Tayana. "Cheoy Lee Pedrick 36, 1985 Model: This boat is simply a very good looking boat; it has loads of visual appeal and has been well-kept. The teak deck is in quite good condition, as are the topside fittings and rigging." Did they build them the same way? I don't know. Eric Rich Hampel wrote in message ... The underlayment of teak decks on Tayanas is built up of softwood squares individually isolated by dams of polyester. If such underlayment does get wet it usually doesnt not spread accross the whole deck as would be the case with ''sheets' of core filler. Not that you cant get a soggy deck on a Tayana; but, if you do the damage wont be as catastrophic as would a deck with continuous underlayment filler. Teak deck maintenance isnt all that bad if you kkep up a gentle and consistent regime of maintenance. Hell, I bet you expend more time scrubbing a glass deck than a teak deck owner does in periodically looking for loose bungs. Give me a teak deck anytime. So what if it makes the boat a bit more top heavy, **nothing** is this world has the non-dkid ability of bare teak. |
Looked today ( Boat Choices)
eric, if you don't know what a Tayana 37 is, don't comment. contribute or
lurk. your only other choice is to open your mouth and be flamed. now, eric, go try to find out what a Tayana 37 is. In her original post she said it was the Cheoy Lee that had the teak decks, not the Tayana. "Cheoy Lee Pedrick 36, 1985 Model: This boat is simply a very good looking boat; it has loads of visual appeal and has been well-kept. The teak deck is in quite good condition, as are the topside fittings and rigging." Did they build them the same way? I don't know. Eric Rich Hampel wrote in message ... The underlayment of teak decks on Tayanas is built up of softwood squares individually isolated by dams of polyester. If such underlayment does get wet it usually doesnt not spread accross the whole deck as would be the case with ''sheets' of core filler. Not that you cant get a soggy deck on a Tayana; but, if you do the damage wont be as catastrophic as would a deck with continuous underlayment filler. Teak deck maintenance isnt all that bad if you kkep up a gentle and consistent regime of maintenance. Hell, I bet you expend more time scrubbing a glass deck than a teak deck owner does in periodically looking for loose bungs. Give me a teak deck anytime. So what if it makes the boat a bit more top heavy, **nothing** is this world has the non-dkid ability of bare teak. |
Boat Choices... teak decks
x-no-archive:yes
"Leanne" wrote: "DSK" wrote in message . .. In short, I own a boat with a teak deck... they're beautiful but they are not practical in any way... the maintenance is awful, the surface is unreliable, and if it's screwed down over cored fiberglass it's a lurking rot instigator. Our teak deck is coming off in the near future, to be replaced by either plain fiberglass with painted non-skid, or perhaps those industrial textured non-skid materials. A friend of mine has a Choy Lee that had the deck problem and he removed the teak and replaced it with Treadmaster. I have it on my boat, which I love, but it is awful on bare feet. I love to go barefoot, and I do not find that Treadmaster is terrible on bare feet. Just very non-slippery. But of course I can walk on gravel barefoot (although I have to be cautious), and I've learned how to walk across a parking lot on a hot day by staying on the white paint lines that mark out the parking spaces. I do draw the line at things like glass, rose bush cuttings and American Chestnut hulls (which have tiny spines) OTOH, my husband doesn't go barefoot at all and has very tender feet. He's pretty AR about not letting anyone on deck with bare feet when underway. And I have proved to myself that the non-Treadmaster parts of the deck are slipperier with bare feet than with shoes. grandma Rosalie |
Boat Choices... teak decks
x-no-archive:yes
"Leanne" wrote: "DSK" wrote in message . .. In short, I own a boat with a teak deck... they're beautiful but they are not practical in any way... the maintenance is awful, the surface is unreliable, and if it's screwed down over cored fiberglass it's a lurking rot instigator. Our teak deck is coming off in the near future, to be replaced by either plain fiberglass with painted non-skid, or perhaps those industrial textured non-skid materials. A friend of mine has a Choy Lee that had the deck problem and he removed the teak and replaced it with Treadmaster. I have it on my boat, which I love, but it is awful on bare feet. I love to go barefoot, and I do not find that Treadmaster is terrible on bare feet. Just very non-slippery. But of course I can walk on gravel barefoot (although I have to be cautious), and I've learned how to walk across a parking lot on a hot day by staying on the white paint lines that mark out the parking spaces. I do draw the line at things like glass, rose bush cuttings and American Chestnut hulls (which have tiny spines) OTOH, my husband doesn't go barefoot at all and has very tender feet. He's pretty AR about not letting anyone on deck with bare feet when underway. And I have proved to myself that the non-Treadmaster parts of the deck are slipperier with bare feet than with shoes. grandma Rosalie |
Boat Choices... teak decks
"Leanne" wrote in message ...
"DSK" wrote in message .. . In short, I own a boat with a teak deck... they're beautiful but they are not practical in any way... the maintenance is awful, the surface is unreliable, and if it's screwed down over cored fiberglass it's a lurking rot instigator. Our teak deck is coming off in the near future, to be replaced by either plain fiberglass with painted non-skid, or perhaps those industrial textured non-skid materials. A friend of mine has a Choy Lee that had the deck problem and he removed the teak and replaced it with Treadmaster. I have it on my boat, which I love, but it is awful on bare feet. Leanne s/v Fundy I happen to think their is nothing better than a teak deck. You get better traction and their easier on your feet because they have more "give" than a fiberglass deck (we're talking about a "proper" installation here, no fiberglass deck underneath). But the best part about them is the cockpit is much cooler than fiberglass, which is very reflective. Just wet the teak down and it doesn't reflect the sunlight like fiberglass, and the water evaporating from the teak helps keep it cool as well. Also, they don't damage like a fiberglass deck when you drop something heavy on it (put a wet rag over the dented teak and a hot clothes iron on top of the rag, keep wetting the rag, you will be surprised how many dents you can get to come out like this). I admitt it takes a lot of work to keep it looking good, but do a side by side comparison, the teak just looks so much better. As far as having a teak deck over a cored deck, who ever did the job should be hung by his thumbs. That's just a serious problem waiting to happen. |
Boat Choices... teak decks
"Leanne" wrote in message ...
"DSK" wrote in message .. . In short, I own a boat with a teak deck... they're beautiful but they are not practical in any way... the maintenance is awful, the surface is unreliable, and if it's screwed down over cored fiberglass it's a lurking rot instigator. Our teak deck is coming off in the near future, to be replaced by either plain fiberglass with painted non-skid, or perhaps those industrial textured non-skid materials. A friend of mine has a Choy Lee that had the deck problem and he removed the teak and replaced it with Treadmaster. I have it on my boat, which I love, but it is awful on bare feet. Leanne s/v Fundy I happen to think their is nothing better than a teak deck. You get better traction and their easier on your feet because they have more "give" than a fiberglass deck (we're talking about a "proper" installation here, no fiberglass deck underneath). But the best part about them is the cockpit is much cooler than fiberglass, which is very reflective. Just wet the teak down and it doesn't reflect the sunlight like fiberglass, and the water evaporating from the teak helps keep it cool as well. Also, they don't damage like a fiberglass deck when you drop something heavy on it (put a wet rag over the dented teak and a hot clothes iron on top of the rag, keep wetting the rag, you will be surprised how many dents you can get to come out like this). I admitt it takes a lot of work to keep it looking good, but do a side by side comparison, the teak just looks so much better. As far as having a teak deck over a cored deck, who ever did the job should be hung by his thumbs. That's just a serious problem waiting to happen. |
Looked today ( Boat Choices)
Hi Wendy,
I looked around in the Kemah area a couple of weeks ago. I think I looked at a couple of the same boats you did. That PSC 34 didn't appear to have been very well taken care of. May be okay, but I steered clear of it. Glad to see you did too. I am not at all impressed with PSC anyway. Can't for the life of me figure out what everybody sees in them and why everybody is so willing to pay 50% more than a comparable boat. I wonder if you happened to take a close look at the joinery work in that boat? The 34 also seemed like a very small boat to me. I did not look at the Pedrick because everything I looked at said he designed the boat as a cruiser/racer, not for offshore work, contrary to the standard Cheoy Lee. Offshore is what *I* plan to do with a boat, which brings me to my main point, buying a boat that matches the intended use. I apologize if the point has already been made. I did a lot of serious thinking about where I wanted to go. How many people would be going, what size sails I wanted to handle, how fast I wanted to get there, etc. I also gave a lot of thought to how much time I expected to spend at sea versus at the dock or at anchor, and what compromises I wanted to make in those areas. I will suggest a couple of boats that might interest you, that are in the Kemah area. First, since you like the Tayana (I did too) you might like the Tayana 42. Also known as the Vancouver 42. The Center Cockpit model has a long fin keel instead of the full length one. The interior is massive. Lots of storage, big cabins, the saloon is more like a living room. There was one down that way for a pretty reasonable price. There is a Mao Ta 36 which is another Taiwan built boat that I don't know a lot about. I have not looked at it yet. The pictures of it are beautiful. I think they are asking $85K. http://www.yachtworld.com Also, a bit more expensive, is the Slocum 36 at the Higgins Smythe docks. Very stout heavy boat with a really neat interior. A/C, Heat, etc. Very pretty boat. Money wise, yes, teak decks are expensive to replace, but it can also cost just as much to replace a rotten or leaking cast iron water or fuel tank if you have to tear out the entire galley to get it out and back in. Many 15-20 year old cruisers have those tanks. Diesels are also thousands to replace. Keel bolts, etc The boat yards I have inquired at tell me that the vast majority of teak deck replacements do not require major work to deck itself. So far I am not so fearful of teak decks. They look great and offer the best non-skid around, even when wet, which is what I want alone in the middle of the ocean. A survey I read a bit ago said that most owners spend 25% of the sales price getting the boat back to the condition they want it in. Don't take that wrong, I am not trying to rain on your parade. I am in the same parade. It just made me rethink about financing, down payments, etc. not to mention the cost of the boat. Do I spend more to get a better boat, or buy less boat to have more left over.........????? Boats!!!! Complicated Business. "Wendy" wrote in message ... I had a close look at four boats today, all offered through brokers. The experience was a pleasurable one; the brokers were pleasant enough and quite helpful. The weather was a bit cool for my taste, though. Anyway, here's what I looked over in the order in which I saw them, along with my thoughts: Cheoy Lee Pedrick 36, 1985 Model: This boat is simply a very good looking boat; it has loads of visual appeal and has been well-kept. The teak deck is in quite good condition, as are the topside fittings and rigging. Belowdecks, the engine is easily accessible, the cabin layout is sensible and not ostentatiously ornate. She has a genset, which is a plus, but no stove- a definite minus (one could easily be added, however). She's radar-equipped, no SSB or GPS. She would be a fine live-aboard and coastal cruiser, and should handle longer range cruising as the tankage is more than adequate. I'd like to research Cheoy Lee's more; I liked this boat. At an asking price of less than $60,000 she is well within my budget. Pacific Seacraft Crealock 34, 1990 Model: Nice boat; she has a spartan interior and a non-nonsense air about her. This boat is clearly designed for ocean passages. Living aboard would not be difficult, but again the boat is designed to go anywhere, not sit on a dock. At just under $100,000 she is out of my price range, so I didn't really seriously evaluate all her features. Cabo Rico 38, 1981 Model: She was once a nice boat, but neglect has sadly hurt her. The below $80,000 price reflects the condition she's in; it would take a lot of work to bring this boat up to snuff. The teak deck is shot. I would take a pass on this boat; I don't want a project. Tayana 37, 1982 Model: Wonderful boat, she has lots of room and is built like a tank. She has a Perkins, which I like as I have lots of experience with them. She's air-conditioned as well, a must in Texas. Very beamy and not at all claustrophobic, the boat is clearly designed for comfort and safety. She is equipped with a wind generator as well as a wind vane steering system. She has no navigation station; the large quarterberth is designed as an aft stateroom. I would prefer a nav station, but a fold down table sort of thing could be easily added by a carpenter. Electronics consists of an SSB; a radar and GPS system would have to be added (I am a Garmin GPS junkie, I'll freely admit that :) Her asking price of $85,000 is within my budget, though I would have to scrape for any planned add-ons. It should be apparent that the first and last boats I looked at were the two which appealed most to me. I have distinct reservations about a teak deck, and while the Cheoy Lee is not the dedicated ocean passage boat that the Tayana is, she would no doubt provide years of performance and satisfaction. The Tayana represents security, comfort, and hominess. She has many of the features I would like in a boat, and probably represents the better investment of the two. It's quite clear to me that I am not exactly sure what I want at this point in time, although I am sure that as I continue to research and actively start sailing that this will become self-evident before I buy. I understand now why searching for a boat can take quite some time. Wendy |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:56 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com