Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2007-12-09 21:36:03 -0500, Wayne.B said:
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 01:51:15 GMT, Jere Lull wrote: That the difference in efficiency between a dinky 12x8 spinning at 2500 rpms or more, and a 16x10 spinning at about 1200. I understand you point. You now need less horsepower to achieve the same boat speed because you have a more efficient prop, and are running the engine in a more efficient power range. Was there any impact on sailing performance? I didn't sail Xan with the old engine/trans/prop, but expect there was some "hit" with the larger 2-blade. When we switched to a 16" feathering 3-blade, we noticed a significant improvement under sail over the 15, mostly in low winds where we're able to sail at 3-4 knots in conditions that we used to motor in. It "feels" like we point a bit better under all conditions, but I can't document that. Also measured a slight decrease in fuel efficiency after the switch, maybe as much as 15%, but that's only 0.26 to 0.33 gph at our normal cruise. -- Jere Lull Tanzer 28 #4 out of Tolchester, MD Xan's pages: http://web.mac.com/jerelull/iWeb/Xan/ Our BVI trips & tips: http://homepage.mac.com/jerelull/BVI/ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
PerfectPitch prop | Cruising | |||
PerfectPitch prop from CDI | Cruising | |||
PDQ Performance? | ASA | |||
Performance coach and performance enhancing drugs... | UK Paddle | |||
Prop sizes/performance | General |