Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I personally don't think they are as good. I replaced three on my boat with
Groco seacocks. You are correct about the plug valves working like the valves on titration tubes. You would turn the rubber plug to the position then tighten a screw on the other side which would smush the rubber plug inside the housing, locking it in place. They had to be taken apart annually or so and cleaned and lubed. When you tighten them up, the rubber squeezes up into the openings, especially in the closed position. You don't have any of these problems with ball valve seacocks, which are usually ss on Teflon seats. "Skip Gundlach" wrote in message ink.net... I'm a bit confused, apparently, by semantics or my limited exposure... I hadn't heard of plug valves, so I went looking. What I saw looked about like every ball valve on the insides - except none had easily position-noted lever handles on the outsides. A tapered plug valve led to visions of the kind of valves I used in titration in school - a tapered seat with a matching taper on the handle/valve, and, perhaps, a spring to hold it firmly down? - but that was not the deal. I presume from reading the various chatter on the topic that perhaps it (taper) refers to the threads at the bottom of the valve/thru-hull? In any event, I'm not the least bit sure how they're better than ball valves, as that's what they look like. Those of you familiar with the benefits of the type over a ball, what is their superiority? Thanks. L8R Skip -- "And then again, when you sit at the helm of your little ship on a clear night, and gaze at the countless stars overhead, and realize that you are quite alone on a great, wide sea, it is apt to occur to you that in the general scheme of things you are merely an insignificant speck on the surface of the ocean; and are not nearly so important or as self-sufficient as you thought you were. Which is an exceedingly wholesome thought, and one that may effect a permanent change in your deportment that will be greatly appreciated by your friends."- James S. Pitkin |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm a bit confused, apparently, by semantics or my limited exposure...
I hadn't heard of plug valves, so I went looking. What I saw looked about like every ball valve on the insides - except none had easily position-noted lever handles on the outsides. A tapered plug valve led to visions of the kind of valves I used in titration in school - a tapered seat with a matching taper on the handle/valve, and, perhaps, a spring to hold it firmly down? - but that was not the deal. I presume from reading the various chatter on the topic that perhaps it (taper) refers to the threads at the bottom of the valve/thru-hull? In any event, I'm not the least bit sure how they're better than ball valves, as that's what they look like. Those of you familiar with the benefits of the type over a ball, what is their superiority? Thanks. L8R Skip -- "And then again, when you sit at the helm of your little ship on a clear night, and gaze at the countless stars overhead, and realize that you are quite alone on a great, wide sea, it is apt to occur to you that in the general scheme of things you are merely an insignificant speck on the surface of the ocean; and are not nearly so important or as self-sufficient as you thought you were. Which is an exceedingly wholesome thought, and one that may effect a permanent change in your deportment that will be greatly appreciated by your friends."- James S. Pitkin |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't know that anyone still makes the traditional in-line tapered
barerel seacocks any more. Wilcox-Critenden made the last that I know of. Spartan Marine still makes a horozontal barrel but that is about it. Groco and Conbraco/Apollo make only ball type. There are several reasons that ball type valves have replaced tapered plugs. Tapered barrels have to be exactly mated to the valve body. That means they are expensive to make but that is not the main reason. First because of the close tolerances, the barrel cannot be replaced. The whole seacock must be replaced. Second, because of the large contact area they are much harder to turn and more prone to freezing up. Third, with use the barrel tends to get wasp waisted and leaks. Tightning becomes a delicate balance between stopping the leak and squeezing out the grease which leads to freezing up. Ball type seacocks use standard parts so they are less expensive to make and easier to replace parts. The nylon seats accomodate any variation in tolerance due to wear and are fairly easy to replace. Keep in mind that I am talking about ball type seacocks. Not ball valves. Seacocks have bases that bolt to the hull. Ball valves are fine for use down stream but not screwed to a throughull. Jere Lull wrote: In article , "John Smith" wrote: Should sea cocks (under the water line) be ball valves or gate valves? Another vote to remove all gate valves immediately. Yours will be old enough that you don't know when they're going to break (or if they've broken already). I'd be SO worried, I'd haul the boat just do do that job. BTW, often it's lots faster to cut old gate valves off than try to unscrew them. A friend's set of railroad socket wrenches and a 6' breaker bar with two beefy guys couldn't unscrew ours. A jig saw and metal cutting blade got rid of it in 15 minutes. Ball valves are the most usual type you find in marine stores. They come with or with flanges. For below the waterline in locations exposed to knocks or stepping on, I prefer the flanged type. Though others say they don't mate properly with through hulls, the ones I've gotten had plenty of threads in contact. [Seemed to take forever to screw them on!] I would prefer proper sea cocks -- the tapered plug type -- but our ball valves have worked well for just about a decade, so I'm not going to worry about it. -- Glenn Ashmore I'm building a 45' cutter in strip/composite. Watch my progress (or lack there of) at: http://www.rutuonline.com Shameless Commercial Division: http://www.spade-anchor-us.com |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't know that anyone still makes the traditional in-line tapered
barerel seacocks any more. Wilcox-Critenden made the last that I know of. Spartan Marine still makes a horozontal barrel but that is about it. Groco and Conbraco/Apollo make only ball type. There are several reasons that ball type valves have replaced tapered plugs. Tapered barrels have to be exactly mated to the valve body. That means they are expensive to make but that is not the main reason. First because of the close tolerances, the barrel cannot be replaced. The whole seacock must be replaced. Second, because of the large contact area they are much harder to turn and more prone to freezing up. Third, with use the barrel tends to get wasp waisted and leaks. Tightning becomes a delicate balance between stopping the leak and squeezing out the grease which leads to freezing up. Ball type seacocks use standard parts so they are less expensive to make and easier to replace parts. The nylon seats accomodate any variation in tolerance due to wear and are fairly easy to replace. Keep in mind that I am talking about ball type seacocks. Not ball valves. Seacocks have bases that bolt to the hull. Ball valves are fine for use down stream but not screwed to a throughull. Jere Lull wrote: In article , "John Smith" wrote: Should sea cocks (under the water line) be ball valves or gate valves? Another vote to remove all gate valves immediately. Yours will be old enough that you don't know when they're going to break (or if they've broken already). I'd be SO worried, I'd haul the boat just do do that job. BTW, often it's lots faster to cut old gate valves off than try to unscrew them. A friend's set of railroad socket wrenches and a 6' breaker bar with two beefy guys couldn't unscrew ours. A jig saw and metal cutting blade got rid of it in 15 minutes. Ball valves are the most usual type you find in marine stores. They come with or with flanges. For below the waterline in locations exposed to knocks or stepping on, I prefer the flanged type. Though others say they don't mate properly with through hulls, the ones I've gotten had plenty of threads in contact. [Seemed to take forever to screw them on!] I would prefer proper sea cocks -- the tapered plug type -- but our ball valves have worked well for just about a decade, so I'm not going to worry about it. -- Glenn Ashmore I'm building a 45' cutter in strip/composite. Watch my progress (or lack there of) at: http://www.rutuonline.com Shameless Commercial Division: http://www.spade-anchor-us.com |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"John Smith" wrote: Should sea cocks (under the water line) be ball valves or gate valves? Another vote to remove all gate valves immediately. Yours will be old enough that you don't know when they're going to break (or if they've broken already). I'd be SO worried, I'd haul the boat just do do that job. BTW, often it's lots faster to cut old gate valves off than try to unscrew them. A friend's set of railroad socket wrenches and a 6' breaker bar with two beefy guys couldn't unscrew ours. A jig saw and metal cutting blade got rid of it in 15 minutes. Ball valves are the most usual type you find in marine stores. They come with or with flanges. For below the waterline in locations exposed to knocks or stepping on, I prefer the flanged type. Though others say they don't mate properly with through hulls, the ones I've gotten had plenty of threads in contact. [Seemed to take forever to screw them on!] I would prefer proper sea cocks -- the tapered plug type -- but our ball valves have worked well for just about a decade, so I'm not going to worry about it. -- Jere Lull Xan-a-Deux ('73 Tanzer 28 #4 out of Tolchester, MD) Xan's Pages: http://members.dca.net/jerelull/X-Main.html Our BVI FAQs (290+ pics) http://homepage.mac.com/jerelull/BVI/ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|