Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#91
posted to rec.boats.cruising,rec.boats.building,sci.engr.mech
|
|||
|
|||
Potable Water - The Third Way.
On 2007-10-08 18:17:58 -0400, Mark Borgerson said:
Getting rid of the disssolved gases in the headspace and as bubbles forming on the sides of the tube is going to be a major headache. Not a headache, an impossibility (they're not really dissolved at that point though) :-) That, and the increase in pressure due to water vapor will make this an oscillating, self-quenching system. It'll require more and more heat as the partial pressures of the non-condensables increases, and the column heights will drop as the pressure goes up, with the diffusion path increasing the whole time. I agree with that part---except for the oscillation part. I think the processes are slow enough and the thermal and physical masses are high enough that the oscillations will be damped out and you will see a slow change to equilibrium with little or no overshoot. Though I consider this whole discussion impractical, I haven't seen anyone mention that the fresh-water side will be drawn down fairly regularly. And, of course, the sea water side will be replenished from time to time. Suck hard enough on the fresh-water side and you get even better "vacuum" at the top. (Dissolved gasses are likely to be a problem, though.) Cool the fresh-water side and water vapor will condense there -- the whole point of the exercise. Thinking only momentarily on a problem that I have little interest in... if the fresh-water side is evacuated to the point that the salt-water side is slightly below the top, every once in a while (or perhaps often), the fresh-water side will be empty and only the previously-dissolved gasses evacuated. The required evacuation pumps and one-way valves sound like the problem at the moment. -- Jere Lull Tanzer 28 #4 out of Tolchester, MD Xan's new pages: http://web.mac.com/jerelull/iWeb/Xan/ Our BVI pages: http://homepage.mac.com/jerelull/BVI/ |
#92
posted to rec.boats.cruising,rec.boats.building,sci.engr.mech
|
|||
|
|||
Potable Water - The Third Way.
Brian Whatcott wrote:
On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 10:13:17 -0700, Keith Hughes wrote: ...I proposed filling the tubes completely with water so that the initial head space would be zero. No, it won't be zero. It can't be. If it is, then you have a solid liquid stream, and it's just a siphon. ... A solid liquid loop will not separate into two separate columns. ... Keith Hughes Perhaps it would be better for you to check what is the maximal rise (head) of a syphon. Can you guess what it might be? Uhmmm, maybe you should follow the thread. If you *pump* the water up the columns, evacuating the headspace as you go, until the columns meet, you can siphon pretty much any height you want. Until outgassing creates a headspace. If the bases of the columns are at differing heights, you have a siphon until that happens. Keith Hughes |
#93
posted to rec.boats.cruising,rec.boats.building,sci.engr.mech
|
|||
|
|||
Potable Water - The Third Way.
Mark Borgerson wrote:
In article , says... Mark Borgerson wrote: In article , says... SNIP You need to get back to the gas law to see where this error lies. You have to *create* the vacuum. That requires a HUGE increase in volume for whatever the initial headspace is. For this to happen you need a much longer tube to start with. You seem to have missed the fact that I proposed filling the tubes completely with water so that the initial head space would be zero. No, it won't be zero. It can't be. If it is, then you have a solid liquid stream, and it's just a siphon. You have to have headspace. And it has to be sufficient to maintain separation of the seawater and freshwater to prevent contamination when filling the tubes. And it has to be large enough to prevent percolation carryover when boiling is initiated. At that point you release the pressure on the water and it falls to the point where water weight plus vapor pressure equals 1ATm. A solid liquid loop will not separate into two separate columns. They have to be separated by a headspace. You can heat the seawater side and create a headspace by liberating dissolved gases, then let the columns drop to create vacuum, but you will have contaminated the freshwater side. The head space is generated by the evaporation (or boiling) of some of the water in a column. It's exactly the same principle that you get it you fill a closed tube full of mercury and then invert it, placing the end in a reservoir of mercury. You seem to be forgetting that the whole purpose is to Purify/desalinate the water. No initial headspace = single process stream = contamination on the distillate side. (We call these things barometers.) Except when we call them Mcleod gauges... You start with no head space, but when you invert it, VOILA! head space appears as the mercury sinks to a level where the weight of the mercury equals the atmospheric pressure. You get a much better vacuum with mercury, since it has a much lower vapor pressure at room temperature. A column of water will behave the same way. The column just has to be much taller. True, but you need to keep the context - water purification. The contamination control features are as crucial to the operational constraints as are the physical parameters. Thus, you have to *Start* with headspace. Sure, you could purge the freshwater side until the contaminants are removed, but by then most, if not all, of your production will be wasted. Some of the historical references on water barometers mention that, despite precautions, the water in the barometer eventually got contaminated with dissolved gases and they lost their accuracy. Yes, you can only deaerate so far prior to filling. Personally, I've never seen an absolute pressure water barometer. IME they are primarily used in an inverted u-tube configuration for DP measurements. BTW, mercury barometers suffer the same fate, primarily through oxidation of the mercury, changing the density. Just look at that almost black film layer on any old barometer. I agree with that part---except for the oscillation part. I think the processes are slow enough and the thermal and physical masses are high enough that the oscillations will be damped out and you will see a slow change to equilibrium with little or no overshoot. You may be right, but I doubt it. Unless you control the temperature versus pressure relationship, which is virtually impossible with any passive heating process, then I'd expect self quenching would result in an oscillating system. Keith Hughes |
#94
posted to rec.boats.cruising,rec.boats.building,sci.engr.mech
|
|||
|
|||
Potable Water - The Third Way.
On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 17:36:59 -0700, Keith Hughes
wrote: ... If you *pump* the water up the columns, evacuating the headspace as you go, until the columns meet, you can siphon pretty much any height you want. ... Keith Hughes No, you cannot syphon to any height. Yes, you can pump to any height, within reason. There is a difference. If you pump to 40 feet head, quite filling an inverted u-tube, for instance, when the pump is halted, the water falls until a particular maximum height is no longer exceeded, if the foot of the u-tube is opened to water whose surface is at atmospheric pressure.. Brian W |
#95
posted to rec.boats.cruising,rec.boats.building,sci.engr.mech
|
|||
|
|||
Potable Water - The Third Way.
Brian Whatcott wrote:
On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 05:33:39 -0700, Keith wrote: Boiling Point Elevation The boiling point of a solution is higher than that of the pure solvent. Accordingly, the use of a solution, rather than a pure liquid, in antifreeze serves to keep the mixture from boiling in a hot automobile engine..... From: http://www.chemistryexplained.com/Ce...roperties.html Actually, no. Ethylene glycol in its pure liquid state boils near 200 degC http://www.dow.com/ethyleneglycol/about/properties.htm It is usually cut to 50% dilution for use as an antifreeze. Brian Whatcott Altus OK Since he used the term "solvent", the assumption, at least on my end, is that he's talking about a solvent/solute system, not a solution of miscible liquids. Keith Hughes |
#96
posted to rec.boats.cruising,rec.boats.building,sci.engr.mech
|
|||
|
|||
Potable Water - The Third Way.
Jere Lull wrote:
On 2007-10-08 18:17:58 -0400, Mark Borgerson said: snip Though I consider this whole discussion impractical, I don't know that I'd call the *discussion* impractical; the device certainly. Kind of the point of the discussion. I haven't seen anyone mention that the fresh-water side will be drawn down fairly regularly. And, of course, the sea water side will be replenished from time to time. Suck hard enough on the fresh-water side and you get even better "vacuum" at the top. (Dissolved gasses are likely to be a problem, though.) Cool the fresh-water side and water vapor will condense there -- the whole point of the exercise. Thinking only momentarily on a problem that I have little interest in... if the fresh-water side is evacuated to the point that the salt-water side is slightly below the top, every once in a while (or perhaps often), the fresh-water side will be empty and only the previously-dissolved gasses evacuated. The required evacuation pumps and one-way valves sound like the problem at the moment. The whole exercise was to get a passive system. If you're going to add a vacuum pump, then you just provide continuous evacuation on the freshwater side, using a demister that drains into the freshwater pool, to separate the water vapor from the non-condensables. But if you accept the need for a pump, why use this rather byzantine approach at all? Keith Hughes |
#97
posted to rec.boats.cruising,rec.boats.building,sci.engr.mech
|
|||
|
|||
Potable Water - The Third Way.
|
#98
posted to rec.boats.cruising,rec.boats.building,sci.engr.mech
|
|||
|
|||
Potable Water - The Third Way.
In article , betwys1
@sbcglobal.net says... On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 05:33:39 -0700, Keith wrote: Boiling Point Elevation The boiling point of a solution is higher than that of the pure solvent. Accordingly, the use of a solution, rather than a pure liquid, in antifreeze serves to keep the mixture from boiling in a hot automobile engine..... From: http://www.chemistryexplained.com/Ce...roperties.html Actually, no. Ethylene glycol in its pure liquid state boils near 200 degC http://www.dow.com/ethyleneglycol/about/properties.htm It is usually cut to 50% dilution for use as an antifreeze. True---when mixing liquids, the boiling point is somewhere between the boiling points of the two. Radiators and cooling systems are pressurized so that the system can have an elevated boiling point. Mark Borgerson |
#100
posted to rec.boats.cruising,rec.boats.building,sci.engr.mech
|
|||
|
|||
Potable Water - The Third Way.
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 18:22:14 -0700, Mark Borgerson
wrote: .... If you pump both the fresh and salt water to the top of the U-Tube, then switch from the pumps to the reservoirs at the bottom, you won't get a siphon. The boiling of water at the top will break the siphon action. Mark Borgerson I am regretting this already. But If I repeat this little test, pumping mercury up an inverted U-tube to 35 inches, when I stop the pump and open the tubes to a mercury pool, the mercury levels in the two tubes drop to a 29.92 inch column each side. The mercury does not boil. 29.92 inches is 760 mm of mercury, by the way. So boiling is not essential to breaking a syphon. Excess height is all that is needed. Brian W |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Potable Water - The Third Way. | Boat Building | |||
Internal Fiberglass potable water tank repair | Boat Building | |||
Is 5200 or Sikaflex ok in potable water tanks | Cruising | |||
Is 5200 or Sikaflex ok in potable water tanks - YES | Boat Building | |||
Fresh-water flushing a raw water system? | Cruising |