On Sep 5, 9:49 pm, Bob wrote:
On Sep 4, 8:24 am, "
wrote:

Oh, forgot my favorite boat that is much dismissed...................
look at the 1970s Cascade boats. Should be several up there.
Bob

Bob,

Thanks. Do tell me more about the Cascade 27 and how it compares
with a Catalina 27. Is this the boat you bought in PT?

Richard

On Sep 6, 8:21 am, "
wrote:
On Sep 5, 9:49 pm, Bob wrote:

On Sep 4, 8:24 am, "
wrote:

Thanks. Do tell me more about the Cascade 27 and how it compares
with a Catalina 27. Is this the boat you bought in PT?

Richard


Hi Richard:

The boat I bought in PT is a Gannon built and finished 1979 Freya 39.
A bit more robust that a Cascade 27 but better suited for what I do. I
have sat on and yacked with several ownners of Cascades over the
years. They vary suprisingly in finsih and configuation realy can not
comment other than the 1970s hulls are bulit proof in that you gots
lots of hand layed glass. ALl the owners I talked to said they were
stable predictable boats. Not fast by Wilburs standards but good
boats. Just need to remember with any 1970s boat you'll replace the
rig, portlights (windows) and fuel tank; rebed all deck hardware , and
gut/ the DC/AC electric pannel and most the wire. You can either do it
right the first time or end up llike Skip & Lydia half assing piece by
piece along the road. Personally i belive cruising should be fun not
one repair after another.

Did you look at the Mahina link I left? There are lots of really sound
boats out there for where you plan on cruising. Dont get locked into
an one boat just because its popular. Take the Freya for example. NOt
many out there. Most folks haven't heard of them, but a very fine boat
fo rwhat I do. ALthough a very slow boat according to Willl burr.

If your like most, including myself, youll find toooo many boats to
consider. I'll leave you with what a surgeon friend of mine says,
"better is the enemy of good." Get a good boat, not the "best boat,"
clean it up, and go have some fun!

Bob

On Sep 6, 11:08 am, Bob wrote:
On Sep 6, 8:21 am, "
wrote:

On Sep 5, 9:49 pm, Bob wrote:

On Sep 4, 8:24 am, "
wrote:
Thanks. Do tell me more about the Cascade 27 and how it compares
with a Catalina 27. Is this the boat you bought in PT?

Richard

Hi Richard:

The boat I bought in PT is a Gannon built and finished 1979 Freya 39.
A bit more robust that a Cascade 27 but better suited for what I do. I
have sat on and yacked with several ownners of Cascades over the
years. They vary suprisingly in finsih and configuation realy can not
comment other than the 1970s hulls are bulit proof in that you gots
lots of hand layed glass. ALl the owners I talked to said they were
stable predictable boats. Not fast by Wilburs standards but good
boats.

....And I assume heavy with a full-keel. In other words, what we call
here in the Pac NW an "offshore-capable" boat.

"Offshore" is a mystical word here. Because we have a HUGE breakwater
known as Vancouver Island, most boaters never go "offshore". So,
there's a mystique around it. "Did you hear about Bob on 'Endless
Love'? He went offshore..." So there's a romantic appeal to an
"offshore" boat.

OTOH, I call them GTE: Get There Eventually. There are virtually NO
conditions "inside" that require a full keel, and since most of the
time the winds are light (and Murphy says they're also blowing from
your destination!), you need a boat that will sail well upwind in
light air, or you'll be motoring wherever you go.

So, if you want a "good solid boat" like a Cascade (or Columbia,
Grampian, Alberg...) be prepared to either wallow in the swells a lot,
or motor. If you want to sail, you need a lighter-weight, fin-keel
boat. (Yes, Columbias and Grampians are both fin-keel, but perform
terribly in light air!). That's not to say you can't get a well-built
boat, though. The Cal/Crown line is VERY well-built, but sail quite
well in any conditions you find "inside" (and not bad "outside", like
the WCVI, but probably not Oregon Coast). Islanders seem well-built as
well. Ericsons are great, although the 27 is another GTE.

Where does Catalina fit into all this? They're EXCELLENT in terms of a
well-sailing boat with lots of room. Their "fit and finish" are not
that great, so the older boats tend to have lots of little things
wrong with them. I wouldn't take a Cat 27 "offshore" (although many
have), but they're actually better suited for the Pac NW than a
Cascade.

Just my opinion...
druid
http://www.bcboatnet.org

druid wrote:
On Sep 6, 11:08 am, Bob wrote:
On Sep 6, 8:21 am, "
wrote:

On Sep 5, 9:49 pm, Bob wrote:
On Sep 4, 8:24 am, "
wrote:
Thanks. Do tell me more about the Cascade 27 and how it compares
with a Catalina 27. Is this the boat you bought in PT?
Richard
Hi Richard:

The boat I bought in PT is a Gannon built and finished 1979 Freya 39.
A bit more robust that a Cascade 27 but better suited for what I do. I
have sat on and yacked with several ownners of Cascades over the
years. They vary suprisingly in finsih and configuation realy can not
comment other than the 1970s hulls are bulit proof in that you gots
lots of hand layed glass. ALl the owners I talked to said they were
stable predictable boats. Not fast by Wilburs standards but good
boats.

...And I assume heavy with a full-keel. In other words, what we call
here in the Pac NW an "offshore-capable" boat.

"Offshore" is a mystical word here. Because we have a HUGE breakwater
known as Vancouver Island, most boaters never go "offshore". So,
there's a mystique around it. "Did you hear about Bob on 'Endless
Love'? He went offshore..." So there's a romantic appeal to an
"offshore" boat.

OTOH, I call them GTE: Get There Eventually. There are virtually NO
conditions "inside" that require a full keel, and since most of the
time the winds are light (and Murphy says they're also blowing from
your destination!), you need a boat that will sail well upwind in
light air, or you'll be motoring wherever you go.

So, if you want a "good solid boat" like a Cascade (or Columbia,
Grampian, Alberg...) be prepared to either wallow in the swells a lot,
or motor. If you want to sail, you need a lighter-weight, fin-keel
boat. (Yes, Columbias and Grampians are both fin-keel, but perform
terribly in light air!). That's not to say you can't get a well-built
boat, though. The Cal/Crown line is VERY well-built, but sail quite
well in any conditions you find "inside" (and not bad "outside", like
the WCVI, but probably not Oregon Coast). Islanders seem well-built as
well. Ericsons are great, although the 27 is another GTE.

Where does Catalina fit into all this? They're EXCELLENT in terms of a
well-sailing boat with lots of room. Their "fit and finish" are not
that great, so the older boats tend to have lots of little things
wrong with them. I wouldn't take a Cat 27 "offshore" (although many
have), but they're actually better suited for the Pac NW than a
Cascade.

Just my opinion...
druid
http://www.bcboatnet.org


Cascade 27 is a fin keel with balanced rudder that goes well in light
air.
Gordon

On 2007-09-04 11:24:10 -0400, "
said:

My wife and I have had a 30 year old swing keel Catalina 22 for five
years.We just spent four weeks sailing it from Port Townsend WA, where
we live, to Princess Louisa Inlet. The boat handled everything fine,
but we are beginning to think we want something a bit bigger if we are
going to do more of the same and perhaps go further north.

We did the same 15 years ago.

Short story: I suggest you determine what you can reasonably expect to
do for the next 5-7 years and list what you need in a boat,
particularly accommodations as they will mean quite a bit more than
they did in the 22. I'll tell you, the first time you stand up to put
on your pants will be an eye-opener! 95% of the time, long distance
cruisers are in a harbor, so accomodationss become more important the
further and longer you go.

Our priorities: Full-time berth for two real adults. (75% of the boats
out there fail that test.) Making up the bed each evening gets old
fast. Head, galley, interior seating, stowage, and cockpit followed in
rough priority. Only after both of us were satisfied with that did my
concerns (keel, hull form, sail plan, etc.) come into play. After some
pretty-fair cruising, I'd add having a reliable engine with fairly high
priority.

A "slow" sailboat can be considerably improved with a good set of
sails. Ours is fast enough stock, but I like speed, so we have a couple
of semi-custom jibs, a proper main and great cruising chute. We
generally keep up with (or pass) boats 10' longer, and regularly pass
30-35' cats under chute.

After 16 seasons of doing far more than our pre-purchase expectations,
Xan's still sufficient for our expected needs for the next 5-7 years,
including an extended trip at least in the Bahamas, possibly through
the BVI. I hope you do as well.

--
Jere Lull
Tanzer 28 #4 out of Tolchester, MD
Xan's new pages: http://web.mac.com/jerelull/iWeb/Xan/
Our BVI pages: http://homepage.mac.com/jerelull/BVI/

On 2007-09-04 11:24:10 -0400, "
said:

we are beginning to think we want something a bit bigger if we are
going to do more of the same and perhaps go further north.

Oh, a good site from someone who did the same thing: cruisenews.net

(Oh, and guess what boat he got? [it wasn't the Alberg which was his
ideal when he started the site.] ;-)

--
Jere Lull
Tanzer 28 #4 out of Tolchester, MD
Xan's new pages: http://web.mac.com/jerelull/iWeb/Xan/
Our BVI pages: http://homepage.mac.com/jerelull/BVI/

"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 04 Sep 2007 15:24:10 -0000, "
said:


Does anyone have any comments on the C27, or alternative boats of this
size ?

You might take a look at the CS27. We looked at a lot of Catalina 27s
before
buying our CS. The CS is just a small amount faster, and is a well-built
Camper and Nicholson design. It does carry a slightly greater draft than
the
Catalina unless you get it in the shoal draft version.


I've sailed a C27 for several years. They're fairly bullet-proof and sail
well. You can also get them for a very decent price and in good shape if
you're willing to look carefully. Ours had the ol' Atomic 4, but we never
had a problem with it... started like a car engine on the first try. You
just need to remember to use the blower. There are lots and lots of them out
there, so getting parts/info is easy. All that said, I almost bought a CS
when I sold my other boat. I was very impressed with the design and sailing
qualities.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

On Tue, 04 Sep 2007 10:01:44 -0700, Capt. JG wrote:

"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 04 Sep 2007 15:24:10 -0000, "
said:


Does anyone have any comments on the C27, or alternative boats of this
size ?

You might take a look at the CS27. We looked at a lot of Catalina 27s
before
buying our CS. The CS is just a small amount faster, and is a well-built
Camper and Nicholson design. It does carry a slightly greater draft than
the
Catalina unless you get it in the shoal draft version.


I've sailed a C27 for several years. They're fairly bullet-proof and sail
well. You can also get them for a very decent price and in good shape if
you're willing to look carefully.

Not very many CS 27's here on the West Coast. Also, didn't like the
outboard rudder - for one thing, how do you convert to wheel steering if
you want to?

True, it's a well-made, good sailing boat, but just not a lot of them out
here (and would cost $5K to ship one from the East).

Ditto the Ericson 28: a VERY nice boat, but can't find one out here.
(Lots of E27's, which are COMPLETELY different - very slow!)

OTOH, you Easterners (and US) are devoid of the Venerable Crown 28 - an
exellent boat built here in North Van.

druid
http://www.bcboatnet.org

I have owned a 1982, 27 Mirage designed by Robert Perry until last year.
I have cruised the Bay of Fundy, Gulf of St Laurent, Coast of Maine and Nova
Scotia for years not to mention Lake Champlain.
The problems I had with this Mirage were related to the diesel engine.
Before finalizing your decision I would look this Robert Perry design. As
for the CS 27 I would inquire about the bow buoyancy in rough weather. The
shape of the hull (similar to a cognac class) is such that when close to
concrete or wood wharf the freeboard makes contact before the toe rail.
Many people have used fender boards with positive results. As for the
Catalina I do not have any comment.
"druid" wrote in message
news
On Tue, 04 Sep 2007 10:01:44 -0700, Capt. JG wrote:

"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 04 Sep 2007 15:24:10 -0000, "
said:


Does anyone have any comments on the C27, or alternative boats of this
size ?

You might take a look at the CS27. We looked at a lot of Catalina 27s
before
buying our CS. The CS is just a small amount faster, and is a well-built
Camper and Nicholson design. It does carry a slightly greater draft than
the
Catalina unless you get it in the shoal draft version.


I've sailed a C27 for several years. They're fairly bullet-proof and sail
well. You can also get them for a very decent price and in good shape if
you're willing to look carefully.

Not very many CS 27's here on the West Coast. Also, didn't like the
outboard rudder - for one thing, how do you convert to wheel steering if
you want to?

True, it's a well-made, good sailing boat, but just not a lot of them out
here (and would cost $5K to ship one from the East).

Ditto the Ericson 28: a VERY nice boat, but can't find one out here.
(Lots of E27's, which are COMPLETELY different - very slow!)

OTOH, you Easterners (and US) are devoid of the Venerable Crown 28 - an
exellent boat built here in North Van.

druid
http://www.bcboatnet.org