Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, I got a nice little Christmas present, a pair of Motorola T4500 FRS
(or so I thought) radios. Seems that these broadcast on both the FRS (Family Radio Service) channels and the newer GMRS (General Mobile Radio Service) frequencies. When FRS came out, they were nice little radios that didn't require a license, and had a good range, relatively inexpensive, etc. Of course, somebody couldn't leave good enough, so they came out with the GMRS frequencies. The radios use a higher power on the GMRS frequencies. Well guess what? To be strictly legal, you have to get a license for these new GMRS frequencies. $75 for 5 years from the FCC, you have to fill out forms 605 and 159. Now, I can of course operate these radios on channels 8-14 ONLY without a license and be legal, because these are the old FRS frequencies. Sheesh, the license is more than the radios! Now how many folks who got these for Christmas do you think are going to apply for an FCC license? Sure reminds me of the old CB radio days. Just another taxation scheme. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I got some and am going through the same headache. To make matters worse I
heard someone made a mistake on his form so the FCC did not grant him a license. They did however cash his $75 check. I am not sure how it ended. "Keith" wrote in message ... Well, I got a nice little Christmas present, a pair of Motorola T4500 FRS (or so I thought) radios. Seems that these broadcast on both the FRS (Family Radio Service) channels and the newer GMRS (General Mobile Radio Service) frequencies. When FRS came out, they were nice little radios that didn't require a license, and had a good range, relatively inexpensive, etc. Of course, somebody couldn't leave good enough, so they came out with the GMRS frequencies. The radios use a higher power on the GMRS frequencies. Well guess what? To be strictly legal, you have to get a license for these new GMRS frequencies. $75 for 5 years from the FCC, you have to fill out forms 605 and 159. Now, I can of course operate these radios on channels 8-14 ONLY without a license and be legal, because these are the old FRS frequencies. Sheesh, the license is more than the radios! Now how many folks who got these for Christmas do you think are going to apply for an FCC license? Sure reminds me of the old CB radio days. Just another taxation scheme. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In the early 70's the CB band also required a license. When the "CB boom"
hit in the mid 70's, the FCC found it didn't have the resources to handle the huge influx of applications, or the the resources to enforce people operating without a liscense. So to save face - they threw the service open to free usage. To date, I've never heard of a case of FCC enforcement on CB that didn't involve numerous complaints about the same operator coupled with the FCC being spoon fed the location of the offender. These complaints always involved very excessive power, or extremely profane operation. Unliscensed operation was way too petty to squander resources on. -W "Keith" wrote in message Now how many folks who got these for Christmas do you think are going to apply for an FCC license? Sure reminds me of the old CB radio days. Just another taxation scheme. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In the early 70's the CB band also required a license. When the "CB boom"
hit in the mid 70's, the FCC found it didn't have the resources to handle the huge influx of applications, or the the resources to enforce people operating without a liscense. So to save face - they threw the service open to free usage. To date, I've never heard of a case of FCC enforcement on CB that didn't involve numerous complaints about the same operator coupled with the FCC being spoon fed the location of the offender. These complaints always involved very excessive power, or extremely profane operation. Unliscensed operation was way too petty to squander resources on. -W "Keith" wrote in message Now how many folks who got these for Christmas do you think are going to apply for an FCC license? Sure reminds me of the old CB radio days. Just another taxation scheme. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Keith" wrote: Well, I got a nice little Christmas present, a pair of Motorola T4500 FRS (or so I thought) radios. Seems that these broadcast on both the FRS (Family Radio Service) channels and the newer GMRS (General Mobile Radio Service) frequencies. When FRS came out, they were nice little radios that didn't require a license, and had a good range, relatively inexpensive, etc. Of course, somebody couldn't leave good enough, so they came out with the GMRS frequencies. The radios use a higher power on the GMRS frequencies. Well guess what? To be strictly legal, you have to get a license for these new GMRS frequencies. $75 for 5 years from the FCC, you have to fill out forms 605 and 159. Now, I can of course operate these radios on channels 8-14 ONLY without a license and be legal, because these are the old FRS frequencies. Sheesh, the license is more than the radios! Now how many folks who got these for Christmas do you think are going to apply for an FCC license? Sure reminds me of the old CB radio days. Just another taxation scheme. If you actually knew what you were talking about you would be DANGEROUS. GMRS predates FRS by only about 30 years. FRS is an unlisensed Service because the power of the radio's is small. GMRS Radios have more power and therefor are capable of interfering with other radio systems that SHARE the same frequencies. This is why they are LICENSED, so that if you interfere with someone else's LICENSED system, they can identify you and get you to STOP. If you aren't capable of filling out the LICENSE FORM or can't AFFORD the fee, then you need to stay on FRS or CB where Mooron's belong. me |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 26 Dec 2003 19:21:40 GMT, Me wrote:
If you actually knew what you were talking about you would be DANGEROUS. GMRS predates FRS by only about 30 years. FRS is an unlisensed Service because the power of the radio's is small. GMRS Radios have more power and therefor are capable of interfering with other radio systems that SHARE the same frequencies. This is why they are LICENSED, so that if you interfere with someone else's LICENSED system, they can identify you and get you to STOP. If you aren't capable of filling out the LICENSE FORM or can't AFFORD the fee, then you need to stay on FRS or CB where Mooron's belong. me Back behind the scenes at all this 2-way-radio nonsense, there's someone who's been pulling the FCC's string for decades. It's M-O-T-O-R-O_)$(&@#_)(%&_)(#$*_)@(#&^%_)NO CARRIER Larry W4CSC NNNN |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Actuallly it was Radio Shack on this one......
In article , Larry W4CSC wrote: On Fri, 26 Dec 2003 19:21:40 GMT, Me wrote: If you actually knew what you were talking about you would be DANGEROUS. GMRS predates FRS by only about 30 years. FRS is an unlisensed Service because the power of the radio's is small. GMRS Radios have more power and therefor are capable of interfering with other radio systems that SHARE the same frequencies. This is why they are LICENSED, so that if you interfere with someone else's LICENSED system, they can identify you and get you to STOP. If you aren't capable of filling out the LICENSE FORM or can't AFFORD the fee, then you need to stay on FRS or CB where Mooron's belong. me Back behind the scenes at all this 2-way-radio nonsense, there's someone who's been pulling the FCC's string for decades. It's M-O-T-O-R-O_)$(&@#_)(%&_)(#$*_)@(#&^%_)NO CARRIER Larry W4CSC NNNN |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 26 Dec 2003 22:09:12 GMT, Rich Hampel
wrote: Actuallly it was Radio Shack on this one...... No, Moto is the reason it has a 1/2w transmitter and the private license fees are so rediculously high for other services. Motorola wants everyone that needs a walkie talkie to buy TRUNKED RADIO SERVICE from, who else, THEM! A friend of mine applied to the private licensing contractor the FCC uses to get a 150 Mhz band system license to put up a nice repeater with a couple of base stations and a bunch of mobiles. He's in the paging business and has been for 30+ years. They actually tried to pull a fast one and told him there were no licenses available....until he filed suit in court. Suddenly, all those dead 150 Mhz frequencies we had been monitoring for 6 months WERE, in fact, available for license. One of Moto's strings must have broken. One of the nice walkies is sitting on my desk. I heard him calling his wife, earlier. We even have a telephone interconnect I can use if my cellphone coverage sucks. The repeater runs high power from 800' up a tower and my 7 watt walkie works 70 miles inland. My point was Motorola doesn't WANT you to have private, untaxed communications over a mile or so.....see? |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I get your message! nothing like a captive market/audience.
'nother question: since these GMRS radios are so close in frequency to the UHF business bands, can they be 'tweaked' to these frequencies --- a la 464 mHz???? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
USING GPS WITH VHF RADIO (DSC) HELP | General | |||
FRS / GMRS Radio FCC licensing | General | |||
Icom 402 radio woes..or is it my antenna system? | Cruising | |||
Radio for Newbies...... | General |