Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jeff wrote:
* Rosalie B. wrote, On 4/24/2007 11:00 AM: Jeff wrote: ... We have an all chain rode so I can't answer the question about the combination rode, but we have the old S-L manual windlass and it works just fine for us. We got it second hand at Bacons After he wakes up, Bob goes up on deck and pulls the slack out of the rode, and then goes and shaves and then comes up and pulls out some more slack, and then cooks his bacon and gets some more slack out and then eats his bacon, and by that time I'm up too, and we start the engine and motor up to the anchor and pull it the rest of the way. He washes off the chain as he pulls it, and when it is clear of the bottom, I motor off while he finishes stowing the anchor. I think you just proved my point about how tedious the S/L manual windlass can be! You may think of it as tedious. We think of it as relaxing. We are not in a hurry. We don't have to be anywhere. If the weather is bad, we can just stay there. The advantages to a manual windlass are -- you don't have to have a battery set up to run it with either long cables to the engine and main battery setup, or long cables from the main battery bank to the bow. There's less chance of trying to use the windlass motor to pull the anchor up and burning it out. We've been on a boat like ours with an electric windlass and thought it was a little dangerous. We do NEED a windlass with all chain and a fairly big anchor. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
* Rosalie B. wrote, On 4/24/2007 8:43 PM:
Jeff wrote: * Rosalie B. wrote, On 4/24/2007 11:00 AM: Jeff wrote: ... We have an all chain rode so I can't answer the question about the combination rode, but we have the old S-L manual windlass and it works just fine for us. We got it second hand at Bacons After he wakes up, Bob goes up on deck and pulls the slack out of the rode, and then goes and shaves and then comes up and pulls out some more slack, and then cooks his bacon and gets some more slack out and then eats his bacon, and by that time I'm up too, and we start the engine and motor up to the anchor and pull it the rest of the way. He washes off the chain as he pulls it, and when it is clear of the bottom, I motor off while he finishes stowing the anchor. I think you just proved my point about how tedious the S/L manual windlass can be! You may think of it as tedious. We think of it as relaxing. We are not in a hurry. We don't have to be anywhere. If the weather is bad, we can just stay there. When I had an all chain/manual windlass setup I was frustrated when I found I wasn't happy with the location. Perhaps the conditions changed, or a newcomer arrived, or perhaps I just missed or miscalculated my intended spot. The hassles of raising the anchor meant that I generally didn't bother and thus ended up being unhappy about the spot. Now, with lighter gear plus the electric windlass, I reset the anchor about a third of the time, and I'm always happy. The advantages to a manual windlass are -- you don't have to have a battery set up to run it with either long cables to the engine and main battery setup, or long cables from the main battery bank to the bow. Well yes, an electric windlass means electricity. I always thought the extra battery was a bit silly, but running the wire is no big deal. But you have a point that the electric windlass is one more complication to worry about. Of course, most have manual backup. There's less chance of trying to use the windlass motor to pull the anchor up and burning it out. This is a weird reason. I would think that after cooking four or five you might figure it out. We've been on a boat like ours with an electric windlass and thought it was a little dangerous. I admit I came close to having a finger sucked up a gypsy once. That was a harsh lesson that fortunately only cost a bandaid! But I also through my back out on a manual once, so I'd guess they're about even. We do NEED a windlass with all chain and a fairly big anchor. There's certainly no doubt about that. I've come to the conclusion that I can anchor just as reliably with lighter gear - a mixed rope/chain rode plus lighter Delta (or maybe Spade) rather than a heavy CQR or Bruce. But that's a different discussion. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Rope/Chain Rode calculations | Cruising | |||
Installaing a windlass | Cruising | |||
Problems with nylon rode | Cruising | |||
SL Windlass Problem | Cruising | |||
GRETTIR'S SAGA (continued) | ASA |