Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Windlass with rope/chain rode
Anybody out there using a combination rope/chain rode with a horizontal
windlass? Is it manual or electric ? I'm curious how much of a hastle it is shifting the rode from rope drum to gypsy. Do you retrieve a bit of chain on the rope drum to get enough tail and/or use a chain stopper ? |
#2
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Windlass with rope/chain rode
Many horizontal windlasses have combination rope/chain gypsies. I use
an S&L Horizon 1500 with a combination gypsy. I attach my rope to my chain with a back splice. Because this makes the rode thicker it tends to skip at the splice and I sometimes bend a whip onto the chain with a rolling hitch to take the load off when going over the splice. However, in most conditions just pushing down a bit on the splice as it rolls over the gypsy is enough. Some folks recommend using a splice that removes one part of the rope to keep the diameter of the splice small. Even done perfectly this makes the splice 33% weaker and more prone to chafe than the simple back splice so I strongly advise against it. -- Tom. |
#3
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Windlass with rope/chain rode
* Garland Gray II wrote, On 4/23/2007 9:09 PM:
Anybody out there using a combination rope/chain rode with a horizontal windlass? Is it manual or electric ? I'm curious how much of a hastle it is shifting the rode from rope drum to gypsy. Do you retrieve a bit of chain on the rope drum to get enough tail and/or use a chain stopper ? I used to have the old basic Simpson Lawrence manual windlass and hated it. The real problem was that each stroke hauled about a foot of chain, so it was easier to hand-over-hand both the rope and the chain as far as I could before putting it on the gypsy. The only time I used the drum was when the rode was fouled - actually under someone else's rode. My current boat has an electric vertical windlass, without the drum. Although the drum would have been only another few hundred, I haven't missed it. The rope/chain gypsy works almost perfectly - perhaps once a year there's a minor problem, usually just a twist in the chain. The rope splice is not a problem, I used the variation of the eye splice the S/L (now Lewmar) recommended. The amount of chain I use in the rode is influenced by the depth of water I anchor in. I like to be able hook the gypsy with the chain before lifting the anchor. For me, that means 50 feet of chain, which is good for almost any location I'm in, and is a reasonable amount to aid the anchor in setting. And I almost always power up to the anchor with the engine, not with the windlass. When I do use the windlass, I try to do short bursts to straighten the chain off the bottom, and then the weight of the chain pulls the boat forward. Using the windlass to pull the boat against the wind or current will, I believe, shorten its life. |
#4
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Windlass with rope/chain rode
Jeff wrote:
* Garland Gray II wrote, On 4/23/2007 9:09 PM: Anybody out there using a combination rope/chain rode with a horizontal windlass? Is it manual or electric ? I'm curious how much of a hastle it is shifting the rode from rope drum to gypsy. Do you retrieve a bit of chain on the rope drum to get enough tail and/or use a chain stopper ? We have an all chain rode so I can't answer the question about the combination rode, but we have the old S-L manual windlass and it works just fine for us. We got it second hand at Bacons After he wakes up, Bob goes up on deck and pulls the slack out of the rode, and then goes and shaves and then comes up and pulls out some more slack, and then cooks his bacon and gets some more slack out and then eats his bacon, and by that time I'm up too, and we start the engine and motor up to the anchor and pull it the rest of the way. He washes off the chain as he pulls it, and when it is clear of the bottom, I motor off while he finishes stowing the anchor. I used to have the old basic Simpson Lawrence manual windlass and hated it. The real problem was that each stroke hauled about a foot of chain, so it was easier to hand-over-hand both the rope and the chain as far as I could before putting it on the gypsy. The only time I used the drum was when the rode was fouled - actually under someone else's rode. My current boat has an electric vertical windlass, without the drum. Although the drum would have been only another few hundred, I haven't missed it. The rope/chain gypsy works almost perfectly - perhaps once a year there's a minor problem, usually just a twist in the chain. The rope splice is not a problem, I used the variation of the eye splice the S/L (now Lewmar) recommended. The amount of chain I use in the rode is influenced by the depth of water I anchor in. I like to be able hook the gypsy with the chain before lifting the anchor. For me, that means 50 feet of chain, which is good for almost any location I'm in, and is a reasonable amount to aid the anchor in setting. And I almost always power up to the anchor with the engine, not with the windlass. When I do use the windlass, I try to do short bursts to straighten the chain off the bottom, and then the weight of the chain pulls the boat forward. Using the windlass to pull the boat against the wind or current will, I believe, shorten its life. |
#5
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Windlass with rope/chain rode
* Rosalie B. wrote, On 4/24/2007 11:00 AM:
Jeff wrote: .... We have an all chain rode so I can't answer the question about the combination rode, but we have the old S-L manual windlass and it works just fine for us. We got it second hand at Bacons After he wakes up, Bob goes up on deck and pulls the slack out of the rode, and then goes and shaves and then comes up and pulls out some more slack, and then cooks his bacon and gets some more slack out and then eats his bacon, and by that time I'm up too, and we start the engine and motor up to the anchor and pull it the rest of the way. He washes off the chain as he pulls it, and when it is clear of the bottom, I motor off while he finishes stowing the anchor. I think you just proved my point about how tedious the S/L manual windlass can be! |
#6
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Windlass with rope/chain rode
Jeff wrote:
* Rosalie B. wrote, On 4/24/2007 11:00 AM: Jeff wrote: ... We have an all chain rode so I can't answer the question about the combination rode, but we have the old S-L manual windlass and it works just fine for us. We got it second hand at Bacons After he wakes up, Bob goes up on deck and pulls the slack out of the rode, and then goes and shaves and then comes up and pulls out some more slack, and then cooks his bacon and gets some more slack out and then eats his bacon, and by that time I'm up too, and we start the engine and motor up to the anchor and pull it the rest of the way. He washes off the chain as he pulls it, and when it is clear of the bottom, I motor off while he finishes stowing the anchor. I think you just proved my point about how tedious the S/L manual windlass can be! You may think of it as tedious. We think of it as relaxing. We are not in a hurry. We don't have to be anywhere. If the weather is bad, we can just stay there. The advantages to a manual windlass are -- you don't have to have a battery set up to run it with either long cables to the engine and main battery setup, or long cables from the main battery bank to the bow. There's less chance of trying to use the windlass motor to pull the anchor up and burning it out. We've been on a boat like ours with an electric windlass and thought it was a little dangerous. We do NEED a windlass with all chain and a fairly big anchor. |
#7
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Windlass with rope/chain rode
* Rosalie B. wrote, On 4/24/2007 8:43 PM:
Jeff wrote: * Rosalie B. wrote, On 4/24/2007 11:00 AM: Jeff wrote: ... We have an all chain rode so I can't answer the question about the combination rode, but we have the old S-L manual windlass and it works just fine for us. We got it second hand at Bacons After he wakes up, Bob goes up on deck and pulls the slack out of the rode, and then goes and shaves and then comes up and pulls out some more slack, and then cooks his bacon and gets some more slack out and then eats his bacon, and by that time I'm up too, and we start the engine and motor up to the anchor and pull it the rest of the way. He washes off the chain as he pulls it, and when it is clear of the bottom, I motor off while he finishes stowing the anchor. I think you just proved my point about how tedious the S/L manual windlass can be! You may think of it as tedious. We think of it as relaxing. We are not in a hurry. We don't have to be anywhere. If the weather is bad, we can just stay there. When I had an all chain/manual windlass setup I was frustrated when I found I wasn't happy with the location. Perhaps the conditions changed, or a newcomer arrived, or perhaps I just missed or miscalculated my intended spot. The hassles of raising the anchor meant that I generally didn't bother and thus ended up being unhappy about the spot. Now, with lighter gear plus the electric windlass, I reset the anchor about a third of the time, and I'm always happy. The advantages to a manual windlass are -- you don't have to have a battery set up to run it with either long cables to the engine and main battery setup, or long cables from the main battery bank to the bow. Well yes, an electric windlass means electricity. I always thought the extra battery was a bit silly, but running the wire is no big deal. But you have a point that the electric windlass is one more complication to worry about. Of course, most have manual backup. There's less chance of trying to use the windlass motor to pull the anchor up and burning it out. This is a weird reason. I would think that after cooking four or five you might figure it out. We've been on a boat like ours with an electric windlass and thought it was a little dangerous. I admit I came close to having a finger sucked up a gypsy once. That was a harsh lesson that fortunately only cost a bandaid! But I also through my back out on a manual once, so I'd guess they're about even. We do NEED a windlass with all chain and a fairly big anchor. There's certainly no doubt about that. I've come to the conclusion that I can anchor just as reliably with lighter gear - a mixed rope/chain rode plus lighter Delta (or maybe Spade) rather than a heavy CQR or Bruce. But that's a different discussion. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#9
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Windlass with rope/chain rode
I have a vertical maxwell with drum and usually pull the boat forward
on the catenary of the chain. As I see the splice approach, I use the slack in the catenary to get a foot or so of chain placed around the gypsy, then often need to twist the end of the rode and splice into the hawse pipe, then power up the chain. In strong conditions I use the engine to create the slack I need to get over the splice. |
#10
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Windlass with rope/chain rode
Thanks for all the comments. It is always good to hear from those who have
tried what works and what doesn't. "Garland Gray II" wrote in message ... Anybody out there using a combination rope/chain rode with a horizontal windlass? Is it manual or electric ? I'm curious how much of a hastle it is shifting the rode from rope drum to gypsy. Do you retrieve a bit of chain on the rope drum to get enough tail and/or use a chain stopper ? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Rope/Chain Rode calculations | Cruising | |||
Installaing a windlass | Cruising | |||
Problems with nylon rode | Cruising | |||
SL Windlass Problem | Cruising | |||
GRETTIR'S SAGA (continued) | ASA |