Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats.cruising
Joe Joe is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,698
Default Troubled 123's

Here was a good question asked the USCG lately.

"I continue to be dumbfounded by what happened to the 110s," Taylor
said during a House hearing March 8. "You are in the business of
running marine safety inspections on every commercial ship in
America , so how the heck do you stretch eight ships and render them
useless, spend $100 million in taxpayers money and nobody in your fine
organization catches this?"
***********
Some marine architect design firm need to pay the us tax payers back +
the original investment in the 110 ft's since they are useless now.
Then every USCG inspector working with them needs to be given a
dishonorable discharge IMO.

Joe

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A bridge over troubled waters? NOYB General 7 January 29th 07 06:13 PM
A bridge over troubled waters? Tim General 6 January 29th 07 01:04 PM
A bridge over troubled waters? Chuck Gould General 1 January 29th 07 04:08 AM
A bridge over troubled waters? Vic Smith General 6 January 29th 07 01:15 AM
A bridge over troubled waters? John Leo H General 0 January 28th 07 03:34 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:32 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017