Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What is gained or lost by discontinuing USCG documentation of a private
sailboat ? Thanks, Courtney |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 7 Apr 2007 17:44:09 -0400, "Courtney Thomas"
wrote: What is gained or lost by discontinuing USCG documentation of a private sailboat ? Since there is no cost or effort to staying documented, why would you want to drop it? As long as the boat is not financed there is very little to lose except that you will be required to post state registration numbers in the US. If the boat is financed, you probably have a contractual obligation to remain documented (and insured). |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Wayne.B" wrote in message
... On Sat, 7 Apr 2007 17:44:09 -0400, "Courtney Thomas" wrote: What is gained or lost by discontinuing USCG documentation of a private sailboat ? Since there is no cost or effort to staying documented, why would you want to drop it? As long as the boat is not financed there is very little to lose except that you will be required to post state registration numbers in the US. If the boat is financed, you probably have a contractual obligation to remain documented (and insured). The fees are typically higher, since you have to pay the fee every year. With documentation, it's a one-time fee, then paperwork once a year. A buyer would probably appreciate that, if you intend to sell it. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am told that the U.S. can commandeer your boat at will if USCG documented.
Would this be true if she was out of U.S. waters ? Would this ever be true if not USCG documented or if of foreign registry ? I should add that fear of U.S. gov. seizure is not a significant motive here, just an example of a potential disadvantage of USCG documentation, and a weighing of pros & cons of USCG documentation is the sole consideration. Another disadvantage, in certain waters, might be... flying the U.S. flag, at all. On the other hand, registering as a foreign vessel would require importation & licensing fees, which is a not inconsiderable cost and would be a good reason to maintain USCG documentation. I guess under the 'right' circumstances any government can legally do the same, but in that I'm considering hailing from a non-U.S. port, and maybe registering it as a non-U.S. vessel, I was wondering what information should be factored into such a decision. The bottom line: if said boat is operating out of the U.S., or hails from a port other than U.S., what [dis]advantages are there in having USCG documentation ? Or is hailing from a U.S. port required for USCG documentation ? Sorry for not being initially more clear, Courtney "Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Sat, 7 Apr 2007 17:44:09 -0400, "Courtney Thomas" wrote: What is gained or lost by discontinuing USCG documentation of a private sailboat ? Since there is no cost or effort to staying documented, why would you want to drop it? As long as the boat is not financed there is very little to lose except that you will be required to post state registration numbers in the US. If the boat is financed, you probably have a contractual obligation to remain documented (and insured). |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Courtney Thomas" wrote in message ... I am told that the U.S. can commandeer your boat at will if USCG documented. Would this be true if she was out of U.S. waters ? Would this ever be true if not USCG documented or if of foreign registry ? I should add that fear of U.S. gov. seizure is not a significant motive here, just an example of a potential disadvantage of USCG documentation, and a weighing of pros & cons of USCG documentation is the sole consideration. Another disadvantage, in certain waters, might be... flying the U.S. flag, at all. On the other hand, registering as a foreign vessel would require importation & licensing fees, which is a not inconsiderable cost and would be a good reason to maintain USCG documentation. I guess under the 'right' circumstances any government can legally do the same, but in that I'm considering hailing from a non-U.S. port, and maybe registering it as a non-U.S. vessel, I was wondering what information should be factored into such a decision. The bottom line: if said boat is operating out of the U.S., or hails from a port other than U.S., what [dis]advantages are there in having USCG documentation ? Or is hailing from a U.S. port required for USCG documentation ? Sorry for not being initially more clear, Courtney Any government at any time for any reason can "sieze" your vessel, and there won't be much you can do about it at the time of siezure. You can, of course, then launch a legal battle to have your rightful property returned to you, but governments, being evil by nature, don't much care whether or not your rights are being violated. And it won't matter whether your boat is federally documented or state registered. In reality, does this happen often? Only if you make yourself a target. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"KLC Lewis" wrote in
: Any government at any time for any reason can "sieze" your vessel, and there won't be much you can do about it at the time of siezure. You can, of course, then launch a legal battle to have your rightful property returned to you, but governments, being evil by nature, don't much care whether or not your rights are being violated. And it won't matter whether your boat is federally documented or state registered. There IS a reason why the superrich always flag their big yachts in small fiefdoms where local officials can easily be bribed into anything with a few dollars, that means nothing to the superrich..... I've never seen them flag their big motoryachts in the US or Canada at the docks, here. Little islands or little countries.... Larry -- |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Larry" wrote in message ... There IS a reason why the superrich always flag their big yachts in small fiefdoms where local officials can easily be bribed into anything with a few dollars, that means nothing to the superrich..... I've never seen them flag their big motoryachts in the US or Canada at the docks, here. Little islands or little countries.... Larry -- Ah, but then these "superrich" also have armies of lawyers at their beck and call, ne? |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Courtney Thomas" wrote in message
... I am told that the U.S. can commandeer your boat at will if USCG documented. Would this be true if she was out of U.S. waters ? Would this ever be true if not USCG documented or if of foreign registry ? I should add that fear of U.S. gov. seizure is not a significant motive here, just an example of a potential disadvantage of USCG documentation, and a weighing of pros & cons of USCG documentation is the sole consideration. Another disadvantage, in certain waters, might be... flying the U.S. flag, at all. On the other hand, registering as a foreign vessel would require importation & licensing fees, which is a not inconsiderable cost and would be a good reason to maintain USCG documentation. I guess under the 'right' circumstances any government can legally do the same, but in that I'm considering hailing from a non-U.S. port, and maybe registering it as a non-U.S. vessel, I was wondering what information should be factored into such a decision. The bottom line: if said boat is operating out of the U.S., or hails from a port other than U.S., what [dis]advantages are there in having USCG documentation ? Or is hailing from a U.S. port required for USCG documentation ? Sorry for not being initially more clear, Courtney "Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Sat, 7 Apr 2007 17:44:09 -0400, "Courtney Thomas" wrote: What is gained or lost by discontinuing USCG documentation of a private sailboat ? Since there is no cost or effort to staying documented, why would you want to drop it? As long as the boat is not financed there is very little to lose except that you will be required to post state registration numbers in the US. If the boat is financed, you probably have a contractual obligation to remain documented (and insured). I'm not overly concerned. If they really think my 1983 Sabre 30 will contribute, I'd be happy to contribute. :-) -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 8 Apr 2007 10:38:52 -0400, "Courtney Thomas"
wrote: The bottom line: if said boat is operating out of the U.S., or hails from a port other than U.S., what [dis]advantages are there in having USCG documentation ? Or is hailing from a U.S. port required for USCG documentation ? I do not believe you can have USCG documentation for a non US home port. Interesting question. Unless you are planning a trip to Cuba I don't believe you'll have any issues with US doc. If you want to break the trail of ownership or cruise to a prohibited destination for some reason, non US doc could be advantageous. |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Courtney Thomas" wrote:
I am told that the U.S. can commandeer your boat at will if USCG documented. Would this be true if she was out of U.S. waters ? The Coast Guard is in lots of places that are not US waters. So Yes I think it could happen. Would this ever be true if not USCG documented or if of foreign registry ? The CG can and will board and inspect boats that are of foreign registry outside of US waters, and also I think will do the same with state registered boats. I should add that fear of U.S. gov. seizure is not a significant motive here, just an example of a potential disadvantage of USCG documentation, and a weighing of pros & cons of USCG documentation is the sole consideration. Another disadvantage, in certain waters, might be... flying the U.S. flag, at all. On the other hand, registering as a foreign vessel would require importation & licensing fees, which is a not inconsiderable cost and would be a good reason to maintain USCG documentation. I guess under the 'right' circumstances any government can legally do the same, but in that I'm considering hailing from a non-U.S. port, and maybe registering it as a non-U.S. vessel, I was wondering what information should be factored into such a decision. The bottom line: if said boat is operating out of the U.S., or hails from a port other than U.S., what [dis]advantages are there in having USCG documentation ? Or is hailing from a U.S. port required for USCG documentation ? You can have any post office in the US as a hailing port regardless of whether you or your boat could be or have been there or not. There are so many places that are named for other places that it probably wouldn't be a problem to find a place name in the US to put on your boat. Just down the road from us is Scotland, and California and across the Chesapeake is Berlin. But IIRC you can't be US documented unless the owner of the boat is a US citizen Sorry for not being initially more clear, Courtney "Wayne.B" wrote in message .. . On Sat, 7 Apr 2007 17:44:09 -0400, "Courtney Thomas" wrote: What is gained or lost by discontinuing USCG documentation of a private sailboat ? Since there is no cost or effort to staying documented, why would you want to drop it? As long as the boat is not financed there is very little to lose except that you will be required to post state registration numbers in the US. If the boat is financed, you probably have a contractual obligation to remain documented (and insured). |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Smackdown...Bob has no boat | ASA | |||
USCG reply to Personal Handheld VHF Query | General | |||
HAM and SSB Frequencies | Cruising | |||
New USCG policy on Advance Notice of Arrival | Cruising | |||
Logbooks and miles recorded | General |