Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is there a general rule of thumb on what size of seas become inherently
unsafe for a particular size of boat? I know there's no firm answer to this, water is unsafe period, and you can be enjoying the trqnquility of 1 foot swells and have Mr. Whale decide to knock on your keel to say hello But is there a general traditional guideline or at least in terms of what size seas vs boat size that starts making YOU uncomfortable and more concerned beyond the vigilance water should always be respected with? Thanks, John ---------- } For a valid email take out the _beer bottles_ before replying but leave the number. ![]() ---------- If you forget about your dreams you die. Live for them, & they will live for you. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "John Reimer" wrote in message ... Is there a general rule of thumb on what size of seas become inherently unsafe for a particular size of boat? I know there's no firm answer to this, water is unsafe period, and you can be enjoying the trqnquility of 1 foot swells and have Mr. Whale decide to knock on your keel to say hello But is there a general traditional guideline or at least in terms of what size seas vs boat size that starts making YOU uncomfortable and more concerned beyond the vigilance water should always be respected with? Thanks, John If breaking waves are equal in height to the beam of your boat, you are in danger of capsize. From wave heights at half your beam to full beam, you are likely to be uncomfortable, and handling your boat will be increasingly difficult and strenuous. As for vigilance, whatever wave height strikes you as uncomfortable and unsafe below that point is correct for you. But wave *shape* and interval has more to do with it, in my opinion, than just height. Pacific rollers of 6-8 feet can be quite safe and comfortable, while Green Bay short sharp waves of 5-6 feet are just plain dangerous. If the conditions seem unsafe to you, they are unsafe for you. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
KLC Lewis wrote:
"John Reimer" wrote in message ... Is there a general rule of thumb on what size of seas become inherently unsafe for a particular size of boat? I know there's no firm answer to this, water is unsafe period, and you can be enjoying the trqnquility of 1 foot swells and have Mr. Whale decide to knock on your keel to say hello But is there a general traditional guideline or at least in terms of what size seas vs boat size that starts making YOU uncomfortable and more concerned beyond the vigilance water should always be respected with? Thanks, John If breaking waves are equal in height to the beam of your boat, you are in danger of capsize. From wave heights at half your beam to full beam, you are likely to be uncomfortable, and handling your boat will be increasingly difficult and strenuous. As for vigilance, whatever wave height strikes you as uncomfortable and unsafe below that point is correct for you. But wave *shape* and interval has more to do with it, in my opinion, than just height. Pacific rollers of 6-8 feet can be quite safe and comfortable, while Green Bay short sharp waves of 5-6 feet are just plain dangerous. I think this is a bit deceptive. "Waves" are almost never encountered in the open ocean except in shallows. "Swells" are what the sea is filled with and other than comfort, there is no minimum size of boat making swells safer. It's the construction and design of the boat that matters, not size. Stephen |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Stephen Trapani" wrote in message ... KLC Lewis wrote: "John Reimer" wrote in message ... Is there a general rule of thumb on what size of seas become inherently unsafe for a particular size of boat? I know there's no firm answer to this, water is unsafe period, and you can be enjoying the trqnquility of 1 foot swells and have Mr. Whale decide to knock on your keel to say hello But is there a general traditional guideline or at least in terms of what size seas vs boat size that starts making YOU uncomfortable and more concerned beyond the vigilance water should always be respected with? Thanks, John If breaking waves are equal in height to the beam of your boat, you are in danger of capsize. From wave heights at half your beam to full beam, you are likely to be uncomfortable, and handling your boat will be increasingly difficult and strenuous. As for vigilance, whatever wave height strikes you as uncomfortable and unsafe below that point is correct for you. But wave *shape* and interval has more to do with it, in my opinion, than just height. Pacific rollers of 6-8 feet can be quite safe and comfortable, while Green Bay short sharp waves of 5-6 feet are just plain dangerous. I think this is a bit deceptive. "Waves" are almost never encountered in the open ocean except in shallows. "Swells" are what the sea is filled with and other than comfort, there is no minimum size of boat making swells safer. It's the construction and design of the boat that matters, not size. Stephen But you are concentrating on the open ocean, while most sailing is done in coastal waters and lakes. And even on the ocean, you have a combination of waves and swells. At river mouths, you also have conflicting waves caused by river current meeting ocean swell and waves. Even in Green Bay, such as is the case at the Memominee River Channel, the chop caused by the river flowing out into waves from any eastern-component wind can make for very messy -- even very dangerous -- conditions. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
....
I think this is a bit deceptive. "Waves" are almost never encountered in the open ocean except in shallows. "Swells" are what the sea is filled with ... That is not correct. While the oceans, unlike smaller bodies of water, have swells they are also well populated with seas. Those seas will be breaking in anything over force 8 and in lesser states when the currents are running against the wind. And, there is also plenty of current even far offshore. -- Tom. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 01 Apr 2007 08:34:05 -0700, Stephen Trapani
wrote: I think this is a bit deceptive. "Waves" are almost never encountered in the open ocean except in shallows. "Swells" are what the sea is filled with and other than comfort, there is no minimum size of boat making swells safer. It's the construction and design of the boat that matters, not size. Stephen Sorry Stephen, I must disagree. The bumpy surface of the sea at sea is a combination of waves caused by the ciurrent wind may continue after wind has ceased and swell which is evidence of waves and weather from a distance. In shallows waves increase in height until they break. That is why coming into shallows such an anchorage or harbour (especially against the tide) can be dangerous or uncomfortable. Agreed that it is the construction and design of the boat that matters but a not to be discounted factor is the seamanship of the crew. Often in sailing a course with high seas running and some breaking behind one, it is better to bear off so that the waves hit on the quarter. Any breaking surge rolls under the boat - you might surf a bit but if your sails are more forward, you will not be pushed around to beam on and a broach. For my boat in conditions where the wind is up and the seas are building, I drop the main altogether and use the genoa. You may have to tack either side of the course but there will be little danger of broaching anmd being rolled. I say "little" because it is the three big ones in a row that are the problem. The first one pushes your stern about and you may lose a bit of forward momentum. That's when it is possible for its friend to throw you around some more. Size of the boat is not as important as seamanship (obtained by making mistakes and experience), design and strength of construction in that order I believe. I'm not an expert on sailing but this is my experience. cheers Peter |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 1 Apr 2007 07:37:46 -0700, "John Reimer"
wrote: But is there a general traditional guideline or at least in terms of what size seas vs boat size that starts making YOU uncomfortable and more concerned beyond the vigilance water should always be respected with? Since one of the biggest dangers to any boat is rollover/capsize, there has been some research with hard numbers in that area. The consensus seems to be that a breaking wave that has a height of 1/2 the beam (width) of the boat is capable of rolling it. After that everything gets very subjective. Some boats have published ratings describing their intended usage, ie, protected water only (small bays and rivers), inshore (typically waves less than 3 feet), coastal, off shore, etc. A lot depends on construction and type, not overall size. Comfort is even more highly subjective, depending on expectations of the people involved and the boat. For small planing boats, under 25 to 30 feet, operating at speed, anything over 1 or 2 feet is going to get uncomfortable very quickly except for very gradual ocean swells. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Reimer wrote:
Is there a general rule of thumb on what size of seas become inherently unsafe for a particular size of boat? I know there's no firm answer to this, water is unsafe period, and you can be enjoying the trqnquility of 1 foot swells and have Mr. Whale decide to knock on your keel to say hello But is there a general traditional guideline or at least in terms of what size seas vs boat size that starts making YOU uncomfortable and more concerned beyond the vigilance water should always be respected with? Thanks, John ---------- } For a valid email take out the _beer bottles_ before replying but leave the number. ![]() ---------- If you forget about your dreams you die. Live for them, & they will live for you. A 1000+ foot carrier is safe in any ocean |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 01 Apr 2007 14:50:02 -0400, krj
wrote: A 1000+ foot carrier is safe in any ocean Not in the South China Sea during a typhoon, it's not - also other seas. Peter |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for the great replies everybody, and KRJ, great idea, but my budget
is LESS than a billion dollars, unfortunately. ![]() But that does bring up an interesting question, what's the biggest ship that's been sent to the bottom by seas? Not icebergs, U-boats, or collisions, but by good ol' Mother Nature, other than turning the Cape and meeting up with the rocks, just out on the open blue water. Will have to look into that... John "krj" wrote in message news:g9TPh.19274$B7.6739@bigfe9... A 1000+ foot carrier is safe in any ocean |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General |