* Dave wrote, On 3/30/2007 4:46 PM:
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 16:32:41 -0400, Jeff said:

An allegation was made, one that verges on calling everyone who who
supports the theory of Global Warming corrupt. An yet, absolutely no
supporting evidence is given. That's blowing smoke!

No Jeff. Blowing smoke is claiming the issue of whether those supporting the
theory of GW are corrupt is to be found in a scientific journal.

Why is that, Dave? I don't follow your logic at all. A claim was
made, I only asked if there was supporting evidence that would be
acceptable to most people. How is that blowing smoke? Most people
would look at it the other way, that making such a claim without
supporting evidence is blowing smoke.

Logic was never your long suit, was it Dave?