"mr.b" wrote in message
news
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 11:13:14 -0600, KLC Lewis wrote:

Actually, my post meant exactly what I intended as I wrote it. But I
suppose when you run out of arguments, restructuring others' posts is all
that's left to you.

hmmm....maybe I used too many words. The site you referenced is the
web-presence of a bunch of paid political hacks with a Republican odour,
financed by corporations with an agenda. Their "experts" lack formal
training in the areas they where they advocate. They exist to obfuscate
the truth and to embroil government agencies in frivolous lawsuits
whenever the interests of public safety are in conflict with big
businesses, like Dow Chemical, Monsanto, ADM, etc...

That looks like an argument to me. You still haven't responded to that.
Oh damn, I used a lot of words again...

Okay, let me respond ad-hominem in kind:

Al Gore and his ilk are knee-jerk reactionary Greenies who want to control
everything, everywhere, every time. They cherry-pick their data to meet
their pre-conceived notions, and their "experts" lack the recognition of
their peers. They despise free enterprise, and are little more than fascists
who wish to Federalize all corporations and make everyone a ward of the
State.

Yeah, that's pretty similar to the "argument" you gave. Hope it isn't to
brief for you to read between the lines.

On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 12:37:32 -0600, KLC Lewis wrote:


"mr.b" wrote in message
news
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 11:13:14 -0600, KLC Lewis wrote:

Actually, my post meant exactly what I intended as I wrote it. But I
suppose when you run out of arguments, restructuring others' posts is
all that's left to you.

hmmm....maybe I used too many words. The site you referenced is the
web-presence of a bunch of paid political hacks with a Republican odour,
financed by corporations with an agenda. Their "experts" lack formal
training in the areas they where they advocate. They exist to obfuscate
the truth and to embroil government agencies in frivolous lawsuits
whenever the interests of public safety are in conflict with big
businesses, like Dow Chemical, Monsanto, ADM, etc...

That looks like an argument to me. You still haven't responded to that.
Oh damn, I used a lot of words again...

Okay, let me respond ad-hominem in kind:

Al Gore and his ilk are knee-jerk reactionary Greenies who want to control
everything, everywhere, every time. They cherry-pick their data to meet
their pre-conceived notions, and their "experts" lack the recognition of
their peers. They despise free enterprise, and are little more than
fascists who wish to Federalize all corporations and make everyone a ward
of the State.

oh my...I'm sorry. You're one of those. I didn't realize. Do you
seriously believe this **** or are you just playing with my head? I mean,
because if you're serious, you have no idea how retarded this looks to a
non-American.

Yeah, that's pretty similar to the "argument" you gave. Hope it isn't to
brief for you to read between the lines.

Well no, it wasn't similar at all and you still haven't said anything of
value. Though reading your responses has reminded me of one of the great
leaders of your country who perhaps said it best; "What a waste it is to
lose one's mind. Or not to have a mind is being very wasteful. How true
that is."

Please feel free to get back to doing whatever it is that you do...as long
as it isn't trying to speak/write intelligently about climate change.

"mr.b" wrote in message
news
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 12:37:32 -0600, KLC Lewis wrote:


"mr.b" wrote in message
news
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 11:13:14 -0600, KLC Lewis wrote:

Actually, my post meant exactly what I intended as I wrote it. But I
suppose when you run out of arguments, restructuring others' posts is
all that's left to you.

hmmm....maybe I used too many words. The site you referenced is the
web-presence of a bunch of paid political hacks with a Republican odour,
financed by corporations with an agenda. Their "experts" lack formal
training in the areas they where they advocate. They exist to obfuscate
the truth and to embroil government agencies in frivolous lawsuits
whenever the interests of public safety are in conflict with big
businesses, like Dow Chemical, Monsanto, ADM, etc...

That looks like an argument to me. You still haven't responded to that.
Oh damn, I used a lot of words again...

Okay, let me respond ad-hominem in kind:

Al Gore and his ilk are knee-jerk reactionary Greenies who want to
control
everything, everywhere, every time. They cherry-pick their data to meet
their pre-conceived notions, and their "experts" lack the recognition of
their peers. They despise free enterprise, and are little more than
fascists who wish to Federalize all corporations and make everyone a ward
of the State.

oh my...I'm sorry. You're one of those. I didn't realize. Do you
seriously believe this **** or are you just playing with my head? I mean,
because if you're serious, you have no idea how retarded this looks to a
non-American.

Yeah, that's pretty similar to the "argument" you gave. Hope it isn't to
brief for you to read between the lines.

Well no, it wasn't similar at all and you still haven't said anything of
value. Though reading your responses has reminded me of one of the great
leaders of your country who perhaps said it best; "What a waste it is to
lose one's mind. Or not to have a mind is being very wasteful. How true
that is."

Please feel free to get back to doing whatever it is that you do...as long
as it isn't trying to speak/write intelligently about climate change.

Remember what I said about rational discourse? You chose that path, Bubbie.
Should you wish to engage in it at some time in the future, please do so.
Until then...

"Go thou, and do likewise."

On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 14:19:31 -0600, "KLC Lewis"
wrote:



Please feel free to get back to doing whatever it is that you do...as long
as it isn't trying to speak/write intelligently about climate change.

Remember what I said about rational discourse? You chose that path, Bubbie.
Should you wish to engage in it at some time in the future, please do so.
Until then...

"Go thou, and do likewise."

Amen Sister.
Even though I disagree with you about climate change

Peter

Hey Peter,
Could you set the time (or the time zone) properly on your machine. I
normally sort by time and your post always show up many hours out of
sequence.

Don't worry, I won't accuse you of time zone plagiarism, there is no
copyright on the correct time.

On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 17:18:33 -0400, Jeff wrote:

Hey Peter,
Could you set the time (or the time zone) properly on your machine. I
normally sort by time and your post always show up many hours out of
sequence.

Don't worry, I won't accuse you of time zone plagiarism, there is no
copyright on the correct time.
Hi Jeff,
Sorry, When I change time zones it is easier to change time and date
without the zone. I keep track of different times in Sydn ey and
Malaysia on my Palm. I have another on the bulkhead which constantly
keeps UT.

Never thought it mattered too much

Done.

cheers
Peter

On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 14:19:31 -0600, KLC Lewis wrote:

snip

honey, in order to take the high ground, you need to know where it is.
Good luck in your search.

"mr.b" wrote in message
news
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 14:19:31 -0600, KLC Lewis wrote:

snip

honey, in order to take the high ground, you need to know where it is.
Good luck in your search.




Hey! He called me "honey"! Guess I made an impression after all. All I need
now is a nice little pat on the butt.

On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 15:29:04 -0600, "KLC Lewis"
wrote:


"mr.b" wrote in message
news
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 14:19:31 -0600, KLC Lewis wrote:

snip

honey, in order to take the high ground, you need to know where it is.
Good luck in your search.




Hey! He called me "honey"! Guess I made an impression after all. All I need
now is a nice little pat on the butt.

Karen,
I simply love to but I''m just a bit too far away. Can I take a rain
cheque in case I come your way some day?

Perhaps it is an opportunity to "turn the other cheek".

Take it as a compliment

In article , mr.b wrote:
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 12:37:32 -0600, KLC Lewis wrote:
oh my...I'm sorry. You're one of those. I didn't realize. Do you
seriously believe this **** or are you just playing with my head? I mean,
because if you're serious, you have no idea how retarded this looks to a
non-American.

Hey. Watch it. I'm an American, but I'm too polite to say it's
retarded. g

Well no, it wasn't similar at all and you still haven't said anything of
value. Though reading your responses has reminded me of one of the great
leaders of your country who perhaps said it best; "What a waste it is to
lose one's mind. Or not to have a mind is being very wasteful. How true
that is."

Dan... now he was something. But, on the upside, he knew how to spell
potatoe. g

--
Capt. JG @@
www.sailnow.com