"mr.b" wrote in message
news
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 12:37:32 -0600, KLC Lewis wrote:


"mr.b" wrote in message
news
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 11:13:14 -0600, KLC Lewis wrote:

Actually, my post meant exactly what I intended as I wrote it. But I
suppose when you run out of arguments, restructuring others' posts is
all that's left to you.

hmmm....maybe I used too many words. The site you referenced is the
web-presence of a bunch of paid political hacks with a Republican odour,
financed by corporations with an agenda. Their "experts" lack formal
training in the areas they where they advocate. They exist to obfuscate
the truth and to embroil government agencies in frivolous lawsuits
whenever the interests of public safety are in conflict with big
businesses, like Dow Chemical, Monsanto, ADM, etc...

That looks like an argument to me. You still haven't responded to that.
Oh damn, I used a lot of words again...

Okay, let me respond ad-hominem in kind:

Al Gore and his ilk are knee-jerk reactionary Greenies who want to
control
everything, everywhere, every time. They cherry-pick their data to meet
their pre-conceived notions, and their "experts" lack the recognition of
their peers. They despise free enterprise, and are little more than
fascists who wish to Federalize all corporations and make everyone a ward
of the State.

oh my...I'm sorry. You're one of those. I didn't realize. Do you
seriously believe this **** or are you just playing with my head? I mean,
because if you're serious, you have no idea how retarded this looks to a
non-American.

Yeah, that's pretty similar to the "argument" you gave. Hope it isn't to
brief for you to read between the lines.

Well no, it wasn't similar at all and you still haven't said anything of
value. Though reading your responses has reminded me of one of the great
leaders of your country who perhaps said it best; "What a waste it is to
lose one's mind. Or not to have a mind is being very wasteful. How true
that is."

Please feel free to get back to doing whatever it is that you do...as long
as it isn't trying to speak/write intelligently about climate change.

Remember what I said about rational discourse? You chose that path, Bubbie.
Should you wish to engage in it at some time in the future, please do so.
Until then...

"Go thou, and do likewise."