Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peggie Hall,
I asume that you will see this message. I am a little worried about trying to clarify your response after viewing the responses tacked onto my initial post. If you would please review my configuration from my initial post. This boat (since 1980) has always been configured: head to vented loop to y valve directional to either holding tank or thru hull. The vented loop is well above the water line, I have never had to close the thru hull when sailing (with the y valve directed toilet/thru hull). I understand that the vented loop is not necessary between the head and holding tank, but it certainly does no damage, and the plumbing is already in place.. To do what you recommend requires quite a lot of re- routing and a heck of a lot of labor. Why would I lower the vented loop down by the thru hull, necessitating the requirement to sail with the thru hull closed? I simply believe that injecting the macerator discharge into a "T" between the head and vented loop (with a ball valve between the "T" and toilet to prevent backflow into the head when operating the macerator) would be a much easier endeavor than anything else. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Anti syphon vents | ASA | |||
Leaking Anti-Siphon Vented Loop | Cruising | |||
Air Head, or not under pressure to perform... | Cruising | |||
head mistress question | Cruising | |||
Boat Sank due to Syphoning Effect | Cruising |