| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#2
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
|
....
If there are a lot of these events, governments are going to balk at some point at the cost.... Draconian government intervention is probably way off, maybe forever due to the small number of cruisers getting into trouble. ... For a while New Zealand was requiring all small vessels leaving the country to pass an inspection as a direct response to the costs of rescuing yachts off shore. New Zealand is, perhaps, unique in that visiting foreign yachts contribute significantly to the national economy and because of this and the lobbying of both businesses and yachties the government amended the law to only cover New Zealand yachts. So, I would not be too sanguine about governments staying out of this. Still, you have to ask yourself about the ethics of setting off six or seven figures worth of stranger's risking their lives when you get into trouble doing something utterly discretionary. Yeah, but is routing a car carrier to the Bearing Sea to save a few grand worth of bunker more or less discretionary than going for a cruise? ... One interpretation of the rules is that the ship maintain the best lookout possible with the equipment and personnel on board. I'm sure Donna Lange is doing just that. ... The Coast Guard officer who advised me when I was applying for my master's ticket was very specific that the US interpretation is that working more than 12 hours a day was illegal. Do you have any reason to believe that there is a national authority anywhere that agrees with your interpretation? -- Tom |