Quite often when I read the replies I feel like I'm playing that kids
game where you tell someone a story and they repeat it to the person
behind them, etc, etc and when the story gets to the end of the line it
bears little resemblance to what happened. And its for this reason that
I don't want to keep discussing point issues.

I also have to laugh about the legal and mental health advice being
issued. In the following post we have bobsprit claiming that I have a
"paranoid nature" because I believe that there are some shoddy marine
products out there! Oh my! I guess I should claim that Bob suffers
from delusional tenancies if he doesn't believe that! :-)

I also had Doug Dotson claiming that I may be making libelous statements
about Fischer Panda. The definition of libel is "A false publication,
as in writing, print, signs, or pictures, that damages a person's
reputation." I can assure you that I've been very careful to make sure
that all of my comments are completely true to the best of my knowledge.
Basically I've presented the history of my ownership as well as
observations related to Fischer Panda's response. While these
statements may damage their reputation, they're based upon the truth and
thus aren't libelous.

I can assure you that I'm not having fun with this, but I'm heavily
vested in this. The general problem is that companies can outspend the
little guy in court and most of these things just go away because people
don't have the financial ability to see them through. This is a case of
where they ran into the wrong guy. Personally I like to see the little
guy challenge the corporations and hopefully win. As I've said over and
over, I'm not doing this for personal gain, I just want to be made whole
again. If RI law didn't provide for this I probably wouldn't have
pursued it. The only people who are making out in this are the lawyers.

-- Geoff

(Bobsprit) wrote in
:

First of all
the genset was dropped during installation when new and apparently the
installer convinced him to repair it rather than insisting on a
replacement.

Good lord. Yes, I seem to remember reading that as well. But I
especially like his comments, such as the one about few responses to
his website, yet he "knows" many people are having problems. I wonder
why they won't join his campaign. His comments about "shoddy products"
is indicative of a paranoid nature. There are rarely "shoddy products"
in the marine industry. There's no money in it. Perhaps he meant to
say that there's flawed products out there? I hope he and FP can come
to some agreement, though his adversarial stance makes that unlikely.
Now if someone would take Hunter to court for making ugly sailboats,
then we'll be getting somewhere!

RB