Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well Bobsprit, you seem to act like you know what's been going on with
my litigation and clearly you don't. I spend 8 months of the year cruising and have just returned. When I did return I found that comments from other disgruntled owners were being attributed to me via the staff of Fischer Panda. That didn't make me happy. At the same time Fischer Panda finally lost their attempt to change the jurisdiction of the law suit to FL. They wanted to fight this case on their turf where the lemon laws are much milder, despite the fact that they have multiple dealers in RI where I had the unit installed. I wasn't present at the hearing, but I was told that the judge almost laughed their lawyer out of court. Anyhow, all that I've ever wanted out of my suit was to make me whole. This unit has been a lemon since day 1, and all that I originally asked for was a replacement generator. They refused. Then I kept investing more $ into the litigation and under RI law I am entitled to have those costs reimbursed. FP came back and offered to replace the generator with units which were not acceptable to me for a lot of reasons (none of which I feel compelled to debate here) but offered nothing for the legal fees. Oh, and by the way, I also had to delete any comments about them from the Internet. I said "no way" as at that time I could have bought 2 generators with my legal fees. Finally I made one more attempt to settle this thing out of court. I was ignored, so I bumped up my pressure and created the www.FischerPandaSucks.com web site. I must admit that I expected more input from other owners, but most seem to have chosen to not participate. I can understand, but I know from e-mail and personal contacts that lots of other people are having similar problems. However, over 600 people have visited the site in the past week. As far as me being a nut case, I'm far from that. I'll be one of the first people to defend a company whose equipment works well. But I also feel the need to let people know what doesn't work. I'm the ex-CEO of New Enland's largest ISP before it was merged into a large telecom company. Since then I've sailed over 20,000 miles and plan to head out on a circumnavigation in January. I have the financial wherewithal and technical ability to carry out such a campaign. I certainly wish that others did too as I believe that we'd have a lot less shoddy products on the market. I have never stated that ALL Fischer Panda products are bad...just the version that I own. My goal as an Internet CEO was to produce the highest quality product that we could. We had multiple Internet news groups of which I was a regular participant. When something didn't work I acknowledged it and discussed what was necessary to fix it. Everything that people asked for wasn't pssible, but I didn't try to run away or hide from the problems. I wanted the best product available. I've been attacked for my approach, but I have to remember that this is unfortuantely so very common on the Internet. The Internet has allowed the wimps of the world to anonymously belittle the people who do try to change things. These are the people who would rather take one up the tailpipe than fight. I'm not one of them. So, I'm sorry if I've wasted your precious bandwidth by clogging up this news group with my opinions. But you know what? I've learned to skip articles that aren't of interest to me. So instead of attacking me, why don't you skip over the posts that you aren't interested in and provide some constructive feedback in the ones that you are. -- Geoff www.geoffschultz.org www.FischerPandaSucks.com (Bobsprit) wrote in : I thought that the juvenile behaviour would be restricted to alt.sailing.asa, but it seems that its members are now posting here as well. There goes the mooring field! This "bombing" of Fischer Panda has gone on for months and months. While a few companies get away with bad products/Bad customer service, I've learned that sometimes the customers are the real problem. Panda even tried to resolve the problem and posted a response. They claim improper installation and so on. We'll never no the whole story, unless we all visit the boat or see detailed pics. The web can be dangerous. A nutty consumer can do a lot of damage and spin stories this way and that. The juvenile responses were well times to what has essentially become a well whipped and very dead horse. Capt Robert B C&C 32 NY |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sorry, skipping over the posts that don't interest me does little
to recover the wasted bandwidth. It has already been wasted. As an ex-CEO of an ISP company you, of course, know this. But then, how many CEOs actually know much about the technical end of what their company does? After leaving and cruising for a year, I get back online only to discover that this tired thread is still rambling on. Get your old generator off of your boat, get a new one, and get on with the important part of why most of us own a boat! And most importantly, GET A LIFE! I suspect that by now FP has gathered enough missinformation to slap you with a libel suit when the time is right. Doug "Geoffrey W. Schultz" wrote in message 9.17... Well Bobsprit, you seem to act like you know what's been going on with my litigation and clearly you don't. I spend 8 months of the year cruising and have just returned. When I did return I found that comments from other disgruntled owners were being attributed to me via the staff of Fischer Panda. That didn't make me happy. At the same time Fischer Panda finally lost their attempt to change the jurisdiction of the law suit to FL. They wanted to fight this case on their turf where the lemon laws are much milder, despite the fact that they have multiple dealers in RI where I had the unit installed. I wasn't present at the hearing, but I was told that the judge almost laughed their lawyer out of court. Anyhow, all that I've ever wanted out of my suit was to make me whole. This unit has been a lemon since day 1, and all that I originally asked for was a replacement generator. They refused. Then I kept investing more $ into the litigation and under RI law I am entitled to have those costs reimbursed. FP came back and offered to replace the generator with units which were not acceptable to me for a lot of reasons (none of which I feel compelled to debate here) but offered nothing for the legal fees. Oh, and by the way, I also had to delete any comments about them from the Internet. I said "no way" as at that time I could have bought 2 generators with my legal fees. Finally I made one more attempt to settle this thing out of court. I was ignored, so I bumped up my pressure and created the www.FischerPandaSucks.com web site. I must admit that I expected more input from other owners, but most seem to have chosen to not participate. I can understand, but I know from e-mail and personal contacts that lots of other people are having similar problems. However, over 600 people have visited the site in the past week. As far as me being a nut case, I'm far from that. I'll be one of the first people to defend a company whose equipment works well. But I also feel the need to let people know what doesn't work. I'm the ex-CEO of New Enland's largest ISP before it was merged into a large telecom company. Since then I've sailed over 20,000 miles and plan to head out on a circumnavigation in January. I have the financial wherewithal and technical ability to carry out such a campaign. I certainly wish that others did too as I believe that we'd have a lot less shoddy products on the market. I have never stated that ALL Fischer Panda products are bad...just the version that I own. My goal as an Internet CEO was to produce the highest quality product that we could. We had multiple Internet news groups of which I was a regular participant. When something didn't work I acknowledged it and discussed what was necessary to fix it. Everything that people asked for wasn't pssible, but I didn't try to run away or hide from the problems. I wanted the best product available. I've been attacked for my approach, but I have to remember that this is unfortuantely so very common on the Internet. The Internet has allowed the wimps of the world to anonymously belittle the people who do try to change things. These are the people who would rather take one up the tailpipe than fight. I'm not one of them. So, I'm sorry if I've wasted your precious bandwidth by clogging up this news group with my opinions. But you know what? I've learned to skip articles that aren't of interest to me. So instead of attacking me, why don't you skip over the posts that you aren't interested in and provide some constructive feedback in the ones that you are. -- Geoff www.geoffschultz.org www.FischerPandaSucks.com (Bobsprit) wrote in : I thought that the juvenile behaviour would be restricted to alt.sailing.asa, but it seems that its members are now posting here as well. There goes the mooring field! This "bombing" of Fischer Panda has gone on for months and months. While a few companies get away with bad products/Bad customer service, I've learned that sometimes the customers are the real problem. Panda even tried to resolve the problem and posted a response. They claim improper installation and so on. We'll never no the whole story, unless we all visit the boat or see detailed pics. The web can be dangerous. A nutty consumer can do a lot of damage and spin stories this way and that. The juvenile responses were well times to what has essentially become a well whipped and very dead horse. Capt Robert B C&C 32 NY |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doug Dotson wrote:
Sorry, skipping over the posts that don't interest me does little to recover the wasted bandwidth. It has already been wasted. As an ex-CEO of an ISP company you, of course, know this. This is incorrect. Don't download or open the thread and "presto" bandwith saved. But then, how many CEOs actually know much about the technical end of what their company does? This is ignorant. It is a completely misinformed assumption to state that CEOs don't know the technical side of their products. I suspect that by now FP has gathered enough missinformation to slap you with a libel suit when the time is right. This is just plain funny. The truth is an absolute defense. Doug, you should let the marketplace of information run without interfering. If you don't care, don't tune in. I, for one, like to see a manufacturer held to account. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I, for one, like to see a manufacturer held
to account. Yes, but not when we don't have access to the facts. We don't and unless someone finds out about the ACTUAL original installation, we won't. The idea that FP should be blamed by default is unfare. RB |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "SkitchNYC" wrote in message ... Doug Dotson wrote: Sorry, skipping over the posts that don't interest me does little to recover the wasted bandwidth. It has already been wasted. As an ex-CEO of an ISP company you, of course, know this. This is incorrect. Don't download or open the thread and "presto" bandwith saved. Hard to tell something is not worth readin until you start to read it. The subject line statys the same with each port so you have no clue until you open the post. But then, how many CEOs actually know much about the technical end of what their company does? This is ignorant. It is a completely misinformed assumption to state that CEOs don't know the technical side of their products. I can only speak from personal experience. Others experiences may vary. I suspect that by now FP has gathered enough missinformation to slap you with a libel suit when the time is right. This is just plain funny. The truth is an absolute defense. It's just that so many contradictary statements have been made by all sides that is is hard to believe that they are all accurate. Doug, you should let the marketplace of information run without interfering. If you don't care, don't tune in. I, for one, like to see a manufacturer held to account. They can be held accountable without broadcasting everything in a newsgroup. Nuff said. I've said all I care to. I didn't intend to get sucked into this discussion. Must have had a brief lapse of sanity. Doug |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Doug Dotson" wrote:
"SkitchNYC" wrote in message ... Doug Dotson wrote: Sorry, skipping over the posts that don't interest me does little to recover the wasted bandwidth. It has already been wasted. As an ex-CEO of an ISP company you, of course, know this. This is incorrect. Don't download or open the thread and "presto" bandwith saved. Hard to tell something is not worth readin until you start to read it. The subject line statys the same with each port so you have no clue until you open the post. Not really true. I often put a delete filter on whole subject lines. So all you'd have to do is filter on Panda and you wouldn't get any posts about that topic. Sometimes I set the filter with an expiration of 30 days of inactivity. That is when there have been no posts with that subject or word in the subject line for 30 days then the filter expires on its own. As a general rule, I figure that any time a subject has more than 40 or 50 posts in it, then it is probably so far off topic that it isn't of interest anymore. I also flag to watch or delete certain people. grandma Rosalie |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Geoff,
Good luck in your campaign and I hope you have success with it. Ignore the rantings of so-called "Capt RB" Bobsprit. He is neither a captain nor an experienced sailor, but rather a well-known and annoying usenet troll. He usually posts in alt.sailing.asa and his experience is limited to several years sailing a few miles from his marina on City Island, NY. He talks a lot, but will quickly reveal his ignorance on any topic of substance. Please let us know how your trials and tribulations with FP turn out. There are several other marine product suppliers that should get the same treatment. I think over time widespread dissemination of information, both positive and negative, will drown out the misleading noise of people like RB and force manufacturers to adhere to higher standards of customer service. Those that do well should be praised and manufacturers should strive for this. Those that produce inferior products and mislead customers shoudld be exposed. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Good luck in your campaign and I hope you have success with it. Ignore the
rantings of so-called "Capt RB" Bobsprit. Hey, Skitch. This is not alt.sailing.asa. Why not keep the talk serious here? RB |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Good luck in your campaign and I hope you have success with it. Ignore the
rantings of so-called "Capt RB" Bobsprit. Hey, Skitch. This is not alt.sailing.asa. Why not keep the talk serious here? I was. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Those that
produce inferior products and mislead customers shoudld be exposed. Only if there is REAL proof that said products exist. NOT because we "read it on the web." RB |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
fischer panda problems | Cruising | |||
Fischer Panda Owner's Forum Shutting Down | General | |||
Fischer Panda Owner's Forum | General | |||
Fischer Panda Owner's Forum | Boat Building | |||
Fischer Panda Owner's Forum | Cruising |