Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #3   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats.cruising
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 172
Default Dangerous Maga-yacht in Maine



--

Roger Long



"Wayne.B" wrote

Sailing single handed in a strong breeze does not excuse anyone from
seamanlike obligations or responsibilities


Why is there no comment about being 228 feet long and owned by someone
richer than God not excusing an operator from seamanlike obligations
or responsibilities?

(the radio) could/should have been readily at hand and turned on


The radio is a back up. Contact is not necessary for the rules of the
road to be in force. Radio break, not all boats have radios,
operating a vessel in this situation with the expectation that you
don't have to observe the rules of the road unless you get a radio
call is neither seamanlike nor responsible.

, sail could/should have been shortened to a more managable level,
an
autopilot could/should be available when single or short handing.


Come on, that's like saying all powerboats should be operated slower
because it will give everyone more time to react to crossing
situations. My vessel was quite managable. It's not that I couldn't
get the radio but that it was easier to simply run off. I ended up
closer to Ram Island than I would have liked but I still cleared it.


You have some dangerous preconceptions.

Look, this is not about me. I handled it smoothly and easily. I
expect this kind of "blind on autopilot" behavior from fishing
vessels. Their crews are dead tired and their world is crumbling
around them as they try to keep up with mortgages. I also expect it
from large vessels that I selfishly don't want dodging every small
yacht among the obstructions of Maine, even if they aren't in the
channel.

My post was about the fact that a no expense spared vessel, presumably
with crew of similar caliber to the paint job, whose Captain and crew
had just spent two weeks tied to the dock in Portland's most luxurious
spot, could behave this way with no way of assessing skill level,
radio functioning (or even existence), etc. aboard my vessel. The
rules of the road don't require them to think about these things, they
simply require them to punch 2 -3 degrees into the autopilot for five
minutes at the appropriate time and then back. There is nothing in
the rules of the road that says they don't have to do this unless
there is radio contact.

If I had been closely obstructed by the shore or had a sheet jammed in
a winch, I certainly would have made a radio call. I could have done
it but it was easier to just divert it a way that made it obvious I
was going to keep clear. I handled it properly and differently than
you might have but THAT'S NOT THE DAMN POINT!


  #4   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats.cruising
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 10,492
Default Dangerous Maga-yacht in Maine

On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 12:57:53 GMT, "Roger Long"
wrote:

The
rules of the road don't require them to think about these things, they
simply require them to punch 2 -3 degrees into the autopilot for five
minutes at the appropriate time and then back.


I'm reasonably sure they would have readily done that if you could
have made your intentions clear to them. It's entirely possible that
they were expecting you to fall off and pass port-to-port since that
would be normal in an oncoming situation in the absence of any other
information.

There is nothing in
the rules of the road that says they don't have to do this unless
there is radio contact.


That's true of course, but if you don't do it, you are assuming at
least some of the risk for any confusion that develops.

The other issue that I have with your description of events could
delicately be described as somewhat attitudinal, particularly with
regard to socio-economic status and means of propulsion. There is
nothing wrong with money, only with not having it. There is nothing
wrong with having an engine on your boat and using it. You need to
get over it. After all, you may win the lottery some day and/or come
up with the most successful ship design ever dreamed of. Hopefully
you'll still talk with us common folk who are down to our last small
yacht when that happens. :-)

Be safe out there...

  #5   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats.cruising
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 172
Default Dangerous Maga-yacht in Maine

"Wayne.B" wrote

The other issue that I have with your description of events could
delicately be described as somewhat attitudinal, particularly with
regard to socio-economic status and means of propulsion.


So what? My attitude (which is not exactly as you describe since I
didn't spend a lifetime around boats and airplanes without some
tolerance for people with money) is irrelevant to the outcome if
anyone crossing the master of this boat in the future. His attitude
however, could have great bearing on the situation.

BTW I've been primarily a powerboat designer for most of my career.

--

Roger Long






  #6   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats.cruising
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 45
Default Dangerous Maga-yacht in Maine

On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 19:28:27 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 12:57:53 GMT, "Roger Long"
snip
There is nothing in
the rules of the road that says they don't have to do this unless

The other issue that I have with your description of events could
delicately be described as somewhat attitudinal, particularly with
regard to socio-economic status and means of propulsion. There is
nothing wrong with money, only with not having it.
Snip


So, there I was at the pool at the Hotel/Marina de la Navidad in Barra
de Navidad. Did you ever see the old Saturday Night Live skit where
Garret Morse hides behind the newspaper when the last other black
customer gets off the bus? A hostess comes out, serves drinks, refunds
fares, and he sees how the other half lives. That's how it felt. I was
hiding behind a book.

Anyway, this marina and lagoon have BIG boats. Attessa (225 feet, 5
stories, helicopter on stern) had just came and left. Paul Allen's
smallest boat was too big for the marina and was anchored in the
lagoon.

Attessa: http://yachts.monacoeye.com/yachtsby...attessa01.html

Besame: http://www.rexyachts.com/YBobBesame104.pdf

Three kinda drunk power boaters and their either wives or nieces from
Philadelphia were at the pool drinking $200 bottles of champagne. The
only one I can identify was the owner of the 100ish footer "Besame",
with a St. Francis YC burgee that had blocked us from the anchorage
at Careyes a few days before (not their fault...small anchorage, big
boat). They were busy comparing the size of their equipment and saying
things like "Sailing is for people who can't afford power boats" and
"heck they can't even afford the fuel." Nyuk nyuk nyuk...

The most obnoxious was the guy who had the smallest equipment (I mean
boat) of course.

So, let me add to your statement, there is nothing wrong with money
except not having it or ranking people on how much they have.

Amazing where a thread on a meeting situation can lead....


  #7   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats.cruising
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 172
Default Dangerous Maga-yacht in Maine

"Wayne.B" wrote

Sailing single handed in a strong breeze does not excuse anyone from
seamanlike obligations or responsibilities


Why is there no comment about being 228 feet long and owned by someone
richer than God not excusing an operator from seamanlike obligations
or responsibilities?

(the radio) could/should have been readily at hand and turned on


The radio is a back up. Contact is not necessary for the rules of the
road to be in force. Radio break, not all boats have radios,
operating a vessel in this situation with the expectation that you
don't have to observe the rules of the road unless you get a radio
call is neither seamanlike nor responsible.

, sail could/should have been shortened to a more managable level,
an
autopilot could/should be available when single or short handing.


Come on, that's like saying all powerboats should be operated slower
because it will give everyone more time to react to crossing
situations. My vessel was quite managable. It's not that I couldn't
get the radio but that it was easier to simply run off. I ended up
closer to Ram Island than I would have liked but I still cleared it.


You have some dangerous preconceptions.

Look, this is not about me. I handled it smoothly and easily. I
expect this kind of "blind on autopilot" behavior from fishing
vessels. Their crews are dead tired and their world is crumbling
around them as they try to keep up with mortgages. I also expect it
from large vessels that I selfishly don't want dodging every small
yacht among the obstructions of Maine, even if they aren't in the
channel.

My post was about the fact that a no expense spared vessel, presumably
with crew of similar caliber to the paint job, whose Captain and crew
had just spent two weeks tied to the dock in Portland's most luxurious
spot, could behave this way with no way of assessing skill level,
radio functioning (or even existence), etc. aboard my vessel. The
rules of the road don't require them to think about these things, they
simply require them to punch 2 -3 degrees into the autopilot for five
minutes at the appropriate time and then back. There is nothing in
the rules of the road that says they don't have to do this unless
there is radio contact.

If I had been closely obstructed by the shore or had a sheet jammed in
a winch, I certainly would have made a radio call. I could have done
it but it was easier to just divert it a way that made it obvious I
was going to keep clear. I handled it properly and differently than
you might have but THAT'S NOT THE DAMN POINT!

--

Roger Long




  #8   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats.cruising
DSK DSK is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,419
Default Dangerous Maga-yacht in Maine

Let me start by saying that I am in favor of using the radio
but I can see Roger's point.


"Wayne.B" wrote
Sailing single handed in a strong breeze does not excuse anyone from
seamanlike obligations or responsibilities



He didn't abidcate any of his responsibilities, nor do
anything unseamanlike.

Roger Long wrote:
Why is there no comment about being 228 feet long and owned by someone
richer than God not excusing an operator from seamanlike obligations
or responsibilities?


Just because.... maybe it's "Pick On Roger Day" or maybe the
secret powerboat cabal is working overtime to prove you're
really the one at fault here.


(the radio) could/should have been readily at hand and turned on



Agreed.


The radio is a back up.


Hmm, that is an interesting point of view... would you say
that out loud in an Admiralty court?

... Contact is not necessary for the rules of the
road to be in force.


True

Radio break, not all boats have radios,


True

Another issue that nobody has brought up yet is that radio
communication often is not fully or clearly understood,
leading to a different response than might be desirable.
Also, radio communication takes time and when two vessels
are on a collision course that can be a very precious commodity.


operating a vessel in this situation with the expectation that you
don't have to observe the rules of the road unless you get a radio
call is neither seamanlike nor responsible.


Very true


, sail could/should have been shortened to a more managable level,
an
autopilot could/should be available when single or short handing.



Come on, that's like saying all powerboats should be operated slower
because it will give everyone more time to react to crossing
situations.


It's like saying all sailboats should douse sail and start
using motors every time any other vessel is anywhere near
them. It's like saying stand-on vessels must maintain speed
& course even if it puts thme up on the rocks.

Why not just make boating illegal. It'd be safer and
eliminate a lot of confusion... cheaper too


My vessel was quite managable. It's not that I couldn't
get the radio but that it was easier to simply run off. I ended up
closer to Ram Island than I would have liked but I still cleared it.


And there is certainly some virtue in taking unilateral
action, rather than equivocate and say "Gee I should use the
radio." But then to some extent, you also forfeit your right
to complain about the other guy's lack of obedience to ColRegs.

For all you know, that captain may have been watching you...
maybe his computerized radar keeping a constant real-time
plot of your projected course and CPA... and saying to
himself, 'If that guy doesn't either tack or get a header in
the next 20 seconds, I've going to turn a few degrees and
give him a little more sea room.' Then he saw you alter
course, and said to himself 'hmm, he did get a header, I
don't have to.'



My post was about the fact that a no expense spared vessel, presumably
with crew of similar caliber to the paint job, whose Captain and crew
had just spent two weeks tied to the dock in Portland's most luxurious
spot, could behave this way with no way of assessing skill level,
radio functioning (or even existence), etc. aboard my vessel. The
rules of the road don't require them to think about these things, they
simply require them to punch 2 -3 degrees into the autopilot for five
minutes at the appropriate time and then back.


Yeah, that would have been nice.

FWIW there has been a perceived decline in the
professionalism of professional captains along the ICW down
here, too. And a lot more weekend warrior jackasses in Sea
Rays, too.


... There is nothing in
the rules of the road that says they don't have to do this unless
there is radio contact.


True.
But there is no reason for you to raise such a storm of
kvetching. You don't know what that captain intended or was
about to do.


If I had been closely obstructed by the shore or had a sheet jammed in
a winch, I certainly would have made a radio call.


And others have just been trying to make the point that the
radio is often not considered a last resort.

... I could have done
it but it was easier to just divert it a way that made it obvious I
was going to keep clear. I handled it properly and differently than
you might have but THAT'S NOT THE DAMN POINT!


Well, for some people it is

Fresh Breezes- Doug King

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Yacht charter Croatia [email protected] Cruising 1 February 23rd 14 02:32 PM
Dangerous mega yacht warning for Maine Roger Long Cruising 86 August 3rd 06 01:12 AM
Deep Blue Yacht Supply, Inc. unveils online storefront [email protected] Cruising 5 June 6th 06 04:48 AM
Yacht Charter Vancouver - Five Star Yacht Charters Todd Zuccolo Cruising 0 April 17th 05 11:58 AM
Update on Marina Damage -- FL Coasts anchorlt Cruising 0 September 24th 04 08:03 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:04 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017